The strongest version of this illusion I’ve seen! Absolute head-wrecker!
21.02.2026 16:36 — 👍 377 🔁 123 💬 24 📌 29@martalockiewicz.bsky.social
Associate Professor at University of Gdańsk. I study reading and dyslexia.
The strongest version of this illusion I’ve seen! Absolute head-wrecker!
21.02.2026 16:36 — 👍 377 🔁 123 💬 24 📌 29You will be fantastic!
29.01.2026 23:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In Polish it is pancernik. Coincidentally, we use exactly the same word for a battleship 🤷
29.01.2026 14:31 — 👍 16 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It is very sad when you read a paper referenced in another paper and the referenced content is not in this original paper.
26.01.2026 14:39 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Jak pięknie! 😍 Czy to z plaży w Gdyni?
21.01.2026 21:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Congratulations 👏
15.01.2026 22:29 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What consistency with oneself is needed for the response to be reliable?
12.01.2026 20:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes, it is. "Ej" is even a separate word itself.
09.01.2026 22:03 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0After 5 years of data collection, our WARN-D machine learning competition to forecast depression onset is now LIVE! We hope many of you will participate—we have incredibly rich data.
If you share a single thing of my lab this year, please make it this competition.
eiko-fried.com/warn-d-machi...
Giving what we can has implemented a fun game where you spin a globe to see how your starting point in life would compare if you were reborn today, randomly somewhere on earth.
www.givingwhatwecan.org/birth-lottery
Very interesting results!
30.12.2025 20:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0For Polish speakers, the German 'Die Kurve' is not a homophone, but close enough, I say.
30.12.2025 19:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Happy birthday! 🎈🎂🎁
18.12.2025 20:52 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Książka o wysokich walorach edukacyjnych. Dzięki niej zrozumiałam, o jaką noc chodzi w "Zacznij od Bacha".
10.12.2025 23:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Na stronach CKE są corocznie publikowane dane ile dzieci z orzeczeniami i opiniami przystąpiło do egzaminu ósmoklasisty. Można zatem sprawdzić ile średnio orzeczeń i opinii przypada na 1 klasę.
10.12.2025 21:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We have made public #openscience materials from the Münster Center for Open Science, specifically flyers and cheatsheets on #OpenAccess, #OpenData, and #Preregistration. Flyers are already on Zenodo, Cheatsheets will follow: zenodo.org/communities/muecos/ and lukasroeseler.github.io/MueCOS-Infom...
10.12.2025 08:11 — 👍 14 🔁 8 💬 0 📌 0Honoured to be featured by the @jacobsfoundation.bsky.social Research Fellowship. Their support enables ambitious, cross-border science on how genetics and environments shape children’s learning & development. 🌍🧬
Work with other Fellows nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com/articles/s41...
Now out in @pnas.org: a tour de force co-led by Sammy Floyd and Olessia Jouravlev (also with @moshepoliak.bsky.social, Zach Mineroff and Ted Gibson): www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
09.12.2025 20:10 — 👍 27 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0Thank you! ♥️♥️♥️
08.12.2025 21:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I've learnt a lot from this paper, very comprehensive and clearly written. A highly recommended read.
07.12.2025 19:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Seems like a good time to remind my fellow Europeans that there are alternatives to US oligarch technology
european-alternatives.eu
Byloby wspaniale zorganizować taki portal w Polsce pod auspicjami @polskaakademianauk.bsky.social @jemielniak.bsky.social
06.12.2025 13:06 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Diederik Stapel was a massive watershed moment in psychology.
However, he was -- and let's be slightly glib here -- some guy from The Netherlands who wrote social psychology papers.
The full accounting of the Eysenck case is approx, at minimum, TWO STAPELS.
retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/n...
Nominations for the UKRN Dorothy Bishop Prize 2026 have opened!
Named after @deevybee.bsky.social, the prize, first awarded in 2022, celebrates the contributions of early career researchers to research improvement.
Nominations close 18 January 2026.
#AcademicSky #Research
13.12.2025 odbędzie się Jubileuszowa Konferencja z okazji 35-lecia Polskiego Towarzystwa Dysleksji: www.ptd.edu.pl/konferencja2...
03.12.2025 17:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Polish: entliczek, pentliczek, czerwony stoliczek, na kogo wypadnie, na tego bęc. Doesn't make much sense really, sth like: entliczek, pentliczek, a red little table, whomever is (randomly) chosen, on them: plonk.
02.12.2025 18:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Happy birthday! 🎂
29.11.2025 17:33 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If you’re in San Diego for #Sfn25, come by on Wednesday at 2 pm for a session on oligodendrocyte pathophysiology and repair mechanisms in multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s disease. Would be great to see some familiar (and new) faces there!
17.11.2025 21:22 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Congratulations! 👏🎉
17.11.2025 21:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Transparent and comprehensive statistical reporting is critical for ensuring the credibility, reproducibility, and interpretability of psychological research. This paper offers a structured set of guidelines for reporting statistical analyses in quantitative psychology, emphasizing clarity at both the planning and results stages. Drawing on established recommendations and emerging best practices, we outline key decisions related to hypothesis formulation, sample size justification, preregistration, outlier and missing data handling, statistical model specification, and the interpretation of inferential outcomes. We address considerations across frequentist and Bayesian frameworks and fixed as well as sequential research designs, including guidance on effect size reporting, equivalence testing, and the appropriate treatment of null results. To facilitate implementation of these recommendations, we provide the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology (TSRP) Checklist that researchers can use to systematically evaluate and improve their statistical reporting practices (https://osf.io/t2zpq/). In addition, we provide a curated list of freely available tools, packages, and functions that researchers can use to implement transparent reporting practices in their own analyses to bridge the gap between theory and practice. To illustrate the practical application of these principles, we provide a side-by-side comparison of insufficient versus best-practice reporting using a hypothetical cognitive psychology study. By adopting transparent reporting standards, researchers can improve the robustness of individual studies and facilitate cumulative scientific progress through more reliable meta-analyses and research syntheses.
Our paper on improving statistical reporting in psychology is now online 🎉
As a part of this paper, we also created the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology checklist, which researchers can use to improve their statistical reporting practices
www.nature.com/articles/s44...