alelinapps.bsky.social

The phrasing of the headline seems exceedingly optimistic…

Defenestration…the great Russian pastime…

Well, you would know if you knew ANYTHING about Copyright law… 🤪
(We REALLY need a universal sarcasm emoji)

🤦‍♂️

🙋‍♂️

I think you mean he doesn’t intend it as a joke. It is very much a joke…

Do I detect some snark? My point was we can’t let Trump’s enablers to deflect and say “that’s not what he meant“. This is why he got elected. His base really doesn’t realize he is an idiot. We need to always frame things as “yes, he is always an idiot, and this is another example.”

It’s not a nitpick. It’s a reframing. The way you said it was implying that in this one instance Trump was an idiot. My comment was Trump is always an idiot, but it does not get pointed out.

He didn’t make him “look like an idiot”, Powell just shined a light on this particular idiocy. The man IS an idiot and shows it often. He just has too many enablers who will agree with any stupid thing he says. That’s how they hide it in plain sight.

Maximizing your minimalism?

That wasn’t Carroll v. Trump (either case). In Carrol, Trump was found liable for defamation. The case where Trump was convicted was People v. Trump (criminal). That was the election interference case with Stormy Daniels. The Carrol verdicts currently stand and are on appeal.

because “flight risk” isn’t a thing under civil law. Only a sovereign government can bring a criminal action in the US. Also, she can’t be tried twice for identical things, so the Feds can’t touch her unless they find other crimes. Also, perjury is rarely brought, especially by itself.

Please, I beg you to stop and learn about the US legal system. The victims could sue her, and if she is found liable, not convicted because that doesn’t exist in civil law, the finder of fact can impose damages against her. Basically she will owe them $. She will not be held in prison… 1 of 2

Took you long enough… 🤪

This post hurts my brain in how wrong it is…if dufus pardons her, then she is completely free. That is our criminal system. If a state wants to try her, and she is convicted, then she goes to prison. Still criminal. Civil cases are about liability. You can’t be convicted in a civil trial.

Something about blind squirrels and nuts…

#WWDC
They led with AI… 🤦‍♂️

There is something very cathartic about a fellow 40 something mom also banging her head against the table in distress and still willing to pick it back up and fight.

They sold to Unilever which is trying to silence them. Don’t buy. Ben & Jerry want to buy it back, so let’s make it cheaper for them to do so…

Green & Gold Congressional Aide This position is limited to Veterans, Gold Star family members and Active-duty spouses desiring to serve a two-year paid Congressional Fellowship as part of the House of Representatives. Selected Fell...

Our office is seeking a veteran, Gold Star Family member, or Active-duty spouse for a 2-year paid position in our LA district office.
 
For more information and to apply, visit:

Seriously? You need to retire for good this time.

No, Trump isn’t smart enough to come up with a formula. Someone pulled this out of their butt, and they went with it because none of them know better.

The problem being a majority of the Cabinet are just as nuts…

WWDC25 June 9-13

He certainly wasn’t hired for his knowledge or competency…

This was an unsatisfying, superficial discussion of §230. Please get writers who actually understand it, or don’t touch it. This was awful.

Yes…

It would be a real shame if y'all shared this online, printed out a few and hung up all around the Eastern Shore of Maryland. 😉

Except they’re not turning the ship. They’re just blowing a big hole in the bottom.

I can’t wait for the take on how, if 230 is eliminated, this is not resolved in the same way under 1A jurisprudence. Assuming the defendant has the money to get there. The alternative is everyone being able to censor everything they don’t like…