Ornery Mange

If only she had free will, she could have made her own decisions.

She had, as the title of her book says, 107 days. Or she could have just had morality from the start and said it.

I wonder why the child of Palestinian immigrants would say that about someone who insisted on supporting the genocide of Palestinians so fervently. Hmm. We'll never know.

How do you know what the unreleased document says?

Today, a week of action against ICE begins in the Twin Cities.

melttheicemn.com

We can't just try to mitigate the worst effects of their bad behavior. We have to take the initiative—to make it impossible for them to continue doing harm.

If you can't make it to the Twin Cities, act where you are.

I'm a steadfast Torment Nexus hater

AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations Leading AIs from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google opted to use nuclear weapons in simulated war games in 95 per cent of cases

This seems like the type of thing @tante.cc is always talking about.
www.newscientist.com/article/2516...

Not an ethic. They require violence. How are those borders maintained? How are taxes collected? By violence and the threat of violence. And if you don't think forcing someone to live in prison is violent, look at what happens to those who don't comply.

A similar analogy comes from Cordelia McGee-Tubb, who has said accessibility is like blueberry muffins: You can’t bake muffins and then try to add blueberries after the muffins are baked. Similarly, you can't have accessible websites if you try to add accessibility at the end. It must be baked in.

YouTube video by Eric Vulgaris Discord for West Marches DMs: Best Practices for Open Table & West Marches Campaigns

A cool person made a cool video that's very useful. Check it out! www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHKO...

I'm done with following you. If you can't figure out how to call bullshit out without being sanist/ableist, take leftist out of your bio. That's lib/con shit

You can convince people to do the moral thing, instead of being adamant that being immoral is good. And I still don't believe you. You haven't tagged in your supposed friend who agrees that the exploitation of others is worth it for their benefit. And if you did, I'd call them an asshole, too.

Oh, and you literally being sanist while trying to convince me it's ok for corporations to steal data tells me a lot. You're definitely a lying piece of shit. Quit using disabled people as your excuse for championing corporations.

Oh, and count me as one disabled person whos says to stop using us as a defense for this shit. We can fucking speak for ourselves, you fuckhead!

You don't disagree it's bad. You just "do not give a shit if it is trained on stolen data" if it can give your friend questionably accurate information? And I was giving you the benefit of doubt. Since you haven't tagged in any disabled people that agree with you, you're lying.

Good thing he made sure ice doesn't get funding. Wait. Shit.

Friend that they didn't tag in for some reason.

Big promises and immediate "You have to repect the armed gang paid with your tax money to bodyslam people". Not shocked. I remember 2008.

"If my friend can experience the web like I can, I do not give a shit if it is trained on stolen data. Who are you to say that blind people should not benefit from AI-assisted tech, YOU CAN SEE lmao." Yeah. Just a shithead

Every disability account I see says to not use them as an excuse for the theft of art, a lot of which is made by disabled people. I am calling you a liar trying to convince people to not have morals instead of convincing them to have some. You're a lying piece of shit.

Cool. Fuck everyone if you don't have to try to convince people to be cool and use alt text. I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT ALL AI. I was explicit about gen ai. Good to know you aren't a comrade. Also, I think you're lying about your blind friend. Unless you count some llm that obviously can't see.

I'm not surprised one fucking bit at his complicity.

I wouldn't walk into what I knew was an orgy and be mad that people were having sex. Walking into what they knew was a preplanned massive snowball fight IS consent to have snowballs thrown at them.

You know how in Pendragon you roll every year for your horses to see if they die? In this ttrpg, you don't do that.

Giving them one chance. And I don't really buy the "my blind friend" shit. All my disabled follows are 100% against gen AI

A photograph of six ICE agents in plainclothes, grinning in a parking lot.

These are ICE agents. They have not bothered to cultivate skills with which to do anything useful for other people. All they do is obey orders, terrorize communities, and rake in your tax dollars.

All humanity should band together against such parasites.

crimethinc.com/mercenaries

in a drinking game that mandates taking a shot when the words "what he meant" are said on cable news tomorrow, there would be no survivors

What do you think is easier: getting people to change behavior, or getting people to abandon morals? Just block those who are asshats and refuse. It's what I do all the time

So, it's ok for corporations to steal from people trying to make enough money to live if it makes your friend's life easier. Because your analogy is shit. If someone steals food from a neighbor instead of a big chain grocery store, they suck. That's what you're equating this to. Just shut up.

Ideally, not have to rely on an algorithm that frequently gets things massively wrong. Presssuring people to at least act like they care works. I know, I've done it. But it's built off of stolen data. Why claim that it should be allowed when changing behavior is possible? Gen ai is vile by nature.