Dan Izzo

Screenshot showing kellijack the fake lawyer has blocked me...

And I was gonna give her my bar number which would make it easier for her to serve me

She insists she's both gotten discovery requests to Bluesky and material back in a matter of like...5 hours..

No you didn't, you're not a lawyer and you never went to law school.

Go ahead and sue me...

I mean Harvard doesn't have "associate editors" for their law reviews so...

Around a dozen states do have criminal defamation laws on the books but they're very rarely used and their constitutionality is...dubious

Are claiming to have filed and served a lawsuit?

You...got discovery without having filed a lawsuit?

That's uh...not a thing.

Well that's just several kinds of bullshit.

When you think of the type of people who push AI so strongly you realize they're EXACTLY the kind of people (mostly men) who demand fawning sycophanty.

And the marks were for? Something embarassing I hope!

Are you saying that you'll agree to be bound by the rules of procedure and evidence in making your own arguments?

Cause OH BOY will it be fund to dissect your "article" under THOSE conditions...(hint: basically all of it will be thrown out)

Also claims to be defending Gaiman against an attack by Nazis by spamming the link to his own "Gaiman is Innocent" tirade on...Substack...

The rest of us have a more evolved sense of morality.

What in the world are you going on about now. You're just replying to things with quotes from your post on a Nazi platform that have nothing to do with what was said...

He held power of eviction over her, any form of "consent" is insanely dubious at that point. Sorry you're ready to excuse that.

It's no different than Trump trying to claim he didn't rape E. Jean Carroll by going "would I have to rape someone? I don't think so..."

Also "why was he grooming anyone" like why do sex pests sex pest? Because they can, because it's about power and control, there's tons of pathologies that could be at play.

This is basically "Gaiman doesn't NEED to groom, he could get a girl any time he wanted" levels of trying to excuse assault.

BTW, are you ever going to deal with the fact that your writing articles claiming to be against antisemitism on a platform that openly endorses and funds Nazis?

Right? Like yeah, the stuff screenshotted from what looks like a 4chan close is extremely antisemitic, no question there.

I'm guessing the magazine didn't publish with those particular "annotations" on the original cover though...

Just, your entire argument is based in such an outdated understanding of consent that it's pretty disgustingly misogynistic.

are antisemitic. And that just, logically, doesn't work. The rest of your claims are just plain old unconvincing and completely ignore well known issues of power imbalance in inherent coercion when it comes to ANY sexual relationship that develops in employer/employee relationships...

My friend - it's not a backpedal.
First of all, Gaiman is a Scientologist. I have no idea if his heritage is Jewish, it certainly could be.
But that's besides the point, you literally used the fact that people are being antisemitic in response to the accusations as proof the accusations themselves

There's certainly antisemitism in the images from the boards.

But yeah, claiming the accusations themselves are some kind of antisemitic plot because Gaiman is Jewish and other people have used them to be antisemitic is way off base.

I don't excuse sex creeps because I think they're good writers.

Yes, I did read it. "Consenual" isn't really a thing given the power dynamics involved. But you just keep trying to excuse rampant sexual misconduct because you like his work.

I was a huge fan of his work and am incredibly pissed and disappointed that it's tarnished by this. But...well...

I mean she also thinks Fox legally ADMITTED to defaming Dominion by settling with them

I mean, just from the outset, the undisputed facts surrounding the situation involving the power dynamics of a rich, older man propositioning the younger live in nanny, in the middle of a lockdown, who's relying on him for income and housing?

Fucking hell - that makes him a sex creep right there.

There's definitely a patsy here, but it's not me.

It's super amusing you have this on a Substack by the way. Do you enjoy funding Nazis with you anti-Nazi postings?

Maybe you should walk the walk.

I did read it, it's not convincing. Hell, GAIMAN doesn't even really argue this stuff didn't happen. He's going with the "but they wanted it" defense.

Claims to have gone to Harvard Law - thinks District Courts are a superior court of appeal OVER the Courts of Appeal.