Nicholas Handler's Avatar

Nicholas Handler

@nicholashandler.bsky.social

Assistant Professor, TAMU School of Law. Interested in administrative law, bureaucracy, civil procedure. Fairweather Jets fan. Opinions my own. SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2879963

3,018 Followers  |  415 Following  |  1,022 Posts  |  Joined: 06.10.2023  |  2.0238

Latest posts by nicholashandler.bsky.social on Bluesky

Calling all administrative law scholars and practitioners! This is an absolutely fantastic event, and it is FREE this year to anyone who wants to participate! Register now!

11.11.2025 23:57 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They’re calling it β€œGrinchmaxxing”

06.11.2025 04:23 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think zoomers need to learn the old ways. Retvrn to tradition.

16.10.2025 00:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You don’t need to read Mein Kampf when you can just sit in your room listening to β€œAerials” by System of a Down on repeat.

15.10.2025 14:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What’s sad is that the America of 1997-2002 basically solved the problem of teenage male culture. In an earlier era these guys would all have just become Juggalos.

15.10.2025 14:30 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Weird to see people describe this place like it's the Comintern when in reality it's 80% people passively aggressively debating whether you have to mask at PTA meetings or whatever.

11.09.2025 14:22 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Extremely bad, very bleak.

10.09.2025 20:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think Fallout Boy did write another version of that song and it was terrible. It was just a bunch of references to, like, Tiger King and Minecraft and stuff.

10.09.2025 04:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Stagflation, anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, new Star Wars franchise, President doing crimes, national guard deployed to American cities. If the Steelers can put together a solid defense we're back in business.

10.09.2025 04:03 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Get in loser, we're reviving procedural due process.

10.09.2025 03:59 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We're doing New Property again. Every day the 1970s is more back.

10.09.2025 03:59 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Judge Cobb prevents the removal of Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve, holding that removal for cause only covers in-office conduct. She also holds that Cook has a constitutionally protected property interest in her position and therefore a right to a hearing.

ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show...

10.09.2025 03:35 β€” πŸ‘ 653    πŸ” 120    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 4

Firing up my Charles Reich laser eyes meme in case SCOTUS recognizes a protected property interest in a position on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

10.09.2025 03:46 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Extremely cool that these people run CBS News now.

09.09.2025 13:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Intellectual Dark Web dares to ask forbidden questions like, "Who is Robert Dahl?" and "What are his books about?"

09.09.2025 13:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Genuinely confused. Did she think this was a different book?

09.09.2025 12:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wait is Robert Dahl woke now? Can’t imagine a funnier book to have a moral panic about.

09.09.2025 12:09 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

It was a boomcession

09.09.2025 01:31 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hearing a 7-year-old scream "I hate music. It's BORING" as I try to listen to Townes Van Zandt.

08.09.2025 21:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't care for it, but I guess they're still a few years away from getting into outlaw country.

08.09.2025 21:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Literally the only music my kids will listen to.

08.09.2025 21:26 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Fourth Circuit holds that states lack standing to sue to enjoin the removal of thousands of federal employees.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

08.09.2025 19:01 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Another win for legal realism. [Insert Louis Brandeis with laser eyes here]

08.09.2025 18:43 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is key. The diminishment of SCOTUS will become a sociological fact before it becomes codified in law. That process is now very well underway.

08.09.2025 18:42 β€” πŸ‘ 189    πŸ” 48    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 4

Yes, but they might want to hedge their bets in the event that that attempt fails. (As it stands, they seem to be YOLOing)

08.09.2025 18:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's very easy to push the message that if you are a Democrat, or a member of a Democratic constituency, the Court does not meaningfully protect your life, liberty, or property anymore.

08.09.2025 17:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A politically savvy Supreme Court might think a little bit about why the Democrats would want to protect it at all when they get back into power.

08.09.2025 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I really think that by 2028, middle-aged, normie, small-c conservative Democrats will be totally, enthusiatically receptive to dramatic court reform. Which is something that has never been true before.

08.09.2025 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

What I find most interesting is that every single demographic ranked "having fame and influence" dead last, which is not the impression you get from, like, TikTok discourse.

08.09.2025 14:46 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Dems need to wait to pick a fight on a winning issue" is just a strange sentiment to express when the administration is currently deeply underwater on *every* issue, including its signature ones like immigration.

08.09.2025 14:39 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@nicholashandler is following 20 prominent accounts