Ade Webb's Avatar

Ade Webb

@adewebb.bsky.social

Philosophy PhD Student (fictionalism, hermeneutics, narrative & interpretation theory) & PTA @Exeter University, UK. Tech chairman. Former FTSE 250 board director. Jazz guitarist, cyclist, dad, husband, animal lover. Trying hard to live off-grid.

424 Followers  |  258 Following  |  1,041 Posts  |  Joined: 08.10.2023  |  2.2235

Latest posts by adewebb.bsky.social on Bluesky


I always return to John Scofield. A Go-Go is the panacea or with Medeski, Martin and Wood… or Uberjam for surprise and delight. My favourite ever guitarist out of a very long long list

15.02.2026 13:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Our family’s favourite ever film.

12.02.2026 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@petersjostedth.bsky.social

12.02.2026 12:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

If I am ever stressed in future, I’m going to think of Chester the Shiba Inu who I met while skiing last week. The embodiment of calm chill. The face… πŸ₯Ή

04.02.2026 11:19 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

10.43am and I’m already cleaning Wyman’s slum of possibles

03.02.2026 10:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Church of Molt. Slightly upgraded Searlian Chinese rooms feeding ticker tape into each other and causing everyone to spontaneously wet their pants. #philsky

01.02.2026 19:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Communities goldfish bowling syntactic processing gymnastics, almost free of grounded semantics (and even less pragmatics). Searle’s Chinese room with linguistically persuasive bells and whistles.

31.01.2026 10:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I suspect with the β€˜no-one going’ coverage, it now attracts the SBIG audience. And journos needing to write about it πŸ˜‰

31.01.2026 10:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The term β€˜Thought patterns’ sits at a tricky junction in the mind-body problem. Do particular thoughts have a β€˜pattern’ that is repeatedly realised in the brain? Or is the β€˜pattern’ an interpretation overlaid onto behaviour using a metaphor from material culture?

31.01.2026 09:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If the compound β€˜Trumpisn’t’
wasn’t deliberate, I vote style it out. It’s the sort of word we need in times like these.

31.01.2026 08:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Heineken Zero Qualia

30.01.2026 19:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The picture makes it πŸ˜‚

30.01.2026 19:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What’s the source? Would like to read all of this.

30.01.2026 15:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

[sic] to function as a meta-linguistic marker for accurate reporting of erroneous phraseology. Unless β€˜sicko fan’ is considered an eggcorn. Then we’re in uncharted territory!

26.01.2026 21:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Perhaps it will not be a matter of planning at all but of improvisations which the widely growing emergency will cause humanity's inventive genius to devise from occasion to occasion. l do not know-and probably no one does. Only the great imperative is overwhelmingly clear to me along with the fact that the human mind alone, the great creator of the danger, can be the potential rescuer from it. No rescuer god will relieve it of this duty, which its position in the order of things places upon it.

From the abyss that is now becoming visible there arise questions we have scarcely ever asked before. Here, in conclusion, a sampling of them. Can nature continue to tolerate the human mind, which it created from its own substance? Must it eliminate the human mind because it finds that mind too destructive of the natural order? Or can the mind ultimately make itself tolerable for nature once it has become aware that it is intolerable? Is peace possible when war was the primeval law governing the relationship between the two? Or was tragedy perhaps the original purpose behind the birth of mind? Is the drama, in spite of its tragic ending, worth performing for the sake of the unfolding of the plot? And how can we make the drama worthwhile in itself, regardless of the ending? How much of its worthwhileness can we sacrifice in order to attempt to avert catastrophe? Is it permissible for us to be inhumane so that humans can continue to live on Earth?
And so on.
All of these are questions of the type Wittgenstein forbade us to ask, since there can be no verifiable answers to them. But they help us to recognize the existing situation, which forces these questions upon us, and to see that it is ourselves to whom these questions are addressed

Perhaps it will not be a matter of planning at all but of improvisations which the widely growing emergency will cause humanity's inventive genius to devise from occasion to occasion. l do not know-and probably no one does. Only the great imperative is overwhelmingly clear to me along with the fact that the human mind alone, the great creator of the danger, can be the potential rescuer from it. No rescuer god will relieve it of this duty, which its position in the order of things places upon it. From the abyss that is now becoming visible there arise questions we have scarcely ever asked before. Here, in conclusion, a sampling of them. Can nature continue to tolerate the human mind, which it created from its own substance? Must it eliminate the human mind because it finds that mind too destructive of the natural order? Or can the mind ultimately make itself tolerable for nature once it has become aware that it is intolerable? Is peace possible when war was the primeval law governing the relationship between the two? Or was tragedy perhaps the original purpose behind the birth of mind? Is the drama, in spite of its tragic ending, worth performing for the sake of the unfolding of the plot? And how can we make the drama worthwhile in itself, regardless of the ending? How much of its worthwhileness can we sacrifice in order to attempt to avert catastrophe? Is it permissible for us to be inhumane so that humans can continue to live on Earth? And so on. All of these are questions of the type Wittgenstein forbade us to ask, since there can be no verifiable answers to them. But they help us to recognize the existing situation, which forces these questions upon us, and to see that it is ourselves to whom these questions are addressed

I read Hans Jonas’ 1992 speech β€˜Philosophy at the End of the Century’ on the recommendation of my prof. Glad I did. The final pages are prescient for the early 90s. #philsky www.jstor.org/stable/40971...

25.01.2026 08:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It remains progress, Tom πŸ’ͺ🏻

24.01.2026 12:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The tide [sic] in the original carries strong indicative power

24.01.2026 08:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A very large leaf in a leaflet rack

A very large leaf in a leaflet rack

The quality of handouts in the philosophy department’s leaflet rack has undergone a significant improvement

23.01.2026 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This solves so many problems. For arid regions, I assume powdered water wouldn’t evaporate. Then just a drop of liquid would revivify it. Genius. Also, consider the sandpit > paddling pool transformation benefit for kids!

23.01.2026 07:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Russian Blue cat sat presumptively on turntable lid

Russian Blue cat sat presumptively on turntable lid

Bold statement #russianblue

22.01.2026 20:18 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Robert Hogan (psychologist) - Wikipedia

Dr Robert Hogan. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_...

21.01.2026 22:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Does Animals hint at a Hogan dark side trait?

21.01.2026 22:06 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That’s a really really dodgy looking photo 😳

21.01.2026 22:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You could pull together quite a few bits from different places… πŸ˜‰

21.01.2026 21:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Spaceman with Adam Sandler much the same. Aesthetically richer with unmodern artefacts.

21.01.2026 17:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Always funny to see objects like CRT TVs in films like Bladerunner and Matrix. Filmmakers could imagine spacecraft but not flat screen TVs. Strange trick of our imaginations

21.01.2026 17:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I saw an aol email address recently. It was like finding an ammonite in a stone.

21.01.2026 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œDropped it on your beetle, Sir”

19.01.2026 19:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Perfect neologism of the day: crump

16.01.2026 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Today is the 107th anniversary of America’s most bizarre non-war time loss of life. The Boston Molasses flood. A 30ft wave of 2million gallons of molasses from a ruptured tank in the dock claimed 21 lives and injured 150. #darktide

15.01.2026 21:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@adewebb is following 20 prominent accounts