asinvader's Avatar

asinvader

@asinvader.bsky.social

ML Engineer | Human Rights Enjoyer | Justice Appreciator | Politics Understander

154 Followers  |  880 Following  |  50 Posts  |  Joined: 17.09.2024  |  2.1131

Latest posts by asinvader.bsky.social on Bluesky

Because the answer to the latter is yes, yes it can. There is an above 60% chance that it can.

11.02.2026 18:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As I see it the fulcrum of this debate is: Can AI agents that automate white collar workflows ever be profitable?

If no: 2008 repeats but maybe even worse (very bad)
If yes: mass job displacement (10x)

The debate is not: Will AI agents be capable of automating most white collar coding jobs

11.02.2026 18:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also I see a lot of folks here who just have no understanding of just how much vibe-coding is now integrated into our workflows in tech. Yes there is an outside chance that agents can automate things end-to-end, eliminating a lot of entry level jobs.

11.02.2026 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I am in tech, I have seen extraordinarily short sighted business decisions be made for a tiny % bump in profit over ONE QUARTER. Will tech execs conduct mass layoffs for fractional % profits in service of participating in the hype cycle? Why wouldn't they?

11.02.2026 18:29 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I see these threads and just don't understand how both can't be true. 1. AI financials are dangerously over-exposed and they need this to work AND 2. precisely because of #1, tech executives force Gen AI on workers to justify firing them, even if in the long run systems start failing.

11.02.2026 18:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

LLM companies make the academic dishonesty equivalent of heroin, and we do not have academic honesty equivalents of methadone yet

08.02.2026 19:10 β€” πŸ‘ 209    πŸ” 27    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 3

From an ML person - if the people who fight clankers come after us, we will have deserved it. And more power to them.

16.12.2025 01:34 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We incorrectly assume that God as an emergent phenomena to explain the unexplainable, while necessary, is a thing of the past. That all modern religions are simply power structures that use the otherwise innocuous emergence of God as political tools. That God cannot emerge again. We are wrong.

14.12.2025 18:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

everyone of these articles are basically "I used chatgpt and realized the sum total of human knowledge is more than what my feeble mind can comprehend". and then instead of attributing it to human ingenuity they go "yeah this is god, that's what this is"

14.12.2025 18:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Every journalist that writes a pro-AI articles behaves like they're talking to God. You don't need chatgpt mate, you need self-respect.

14.12.2025 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

me everyday at all times

12.12.2025 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

hot take: Left-wing purity tests are a fed psyop. It's a total win-win. create internal factionalism and simultaneously generate bad optics/vibes for onlookers.

03.12.2025 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And I still won't cause it's paywalled

02.12.2025 00:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

you know what you were right, I wouldn't have read it without the chot hype

02.12.2025 00:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

G O U R M E T K I T C H E N

01.12.2025 21:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"How brave! Journalism joins the war on power, on the side of power."

22.11.2025 23:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

you are attacking me personally.

22.11.2025 21:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

what's your most spectacular planet find?

22.11.2025 02:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hot take: Harming others through negligence and greed is a worse form evil than harming others out of malice and hatred.

22.11.2025 02:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

and you can tell how massive a grift it is because a true believer would never name themselves after their future God

03.10.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

there's always a dril tweet

12.08.2025 20:58 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

London, UK
Paris, Atlantic Ocean
Rome, France
Rom, Spain
Barcelona, Morocco
P R A G U E
Istanbul, Austria
Vienna, Italy
Antalya, Turkey
Milan, Libya

30.07.2025 00:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

that's it that's the post

24.07.2025 02:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Grokked and Efficiency-pilled

16.06.2025 22:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Economists looking at an idea from sociology literature that they will be the first to write a paper on.

14.05.2025 14:15 β€” πŸ‘ 632    πŸ” 72    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 14

Average Slavoj Zizek interview xperience (first 20 mins):
prompt - happy birthday
response - first of all no, secondly I want to be a GILF, objectification is good, lessons from p*rn about male chauvinism, identifying with the female, totalized subjectification, consumption under capitalism....

13.04.2025 21:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"punching back will make me blind. I need some healing" he says as the bear continues to maul him to death.

07.03.2025 03:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

the closer they are to the ground, the more of a spine they have.

07.03.2025 02:38 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I say this while recognizing that this is possibly the most helpful this visualization could be. I could not thing of a better way.

28.02.2025 00:22 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@asinvader is following 19 prominent accounts