{}
{ }
{ }
{ }
{}
@egypturnash.bsky.social
lackwit gadabout trans lady with red hair who draws stuff very tired of this shitty bruce sterling novel of a future http://egypt.urnash.com - my site, comics! art! https://dragon.style/@anthracite https://comradery.co/egypturnash - support me!
{}
{ }
{ }
{ }
{}
scritch her
25.10.2025 23:08 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0beautiful colors!
25.10.2025 16:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The ham calls to you.
25.10.2025 16:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If you are using chatbots, then if it starts trying to tell you about ๐SPIRALS๐๐and ๐๐๐RECUrSIVE CoLLAPSe FrAMeWorkS๐๐?
DELETE YOUR ENTIRE CHAT HISTORY, YOU ARE IN DANGER.
I am not fucking kidding here. I am really not fucking kidding.
www.lesswrong.com/posts/6ZnznC...
That sounds pretty chill. Especially if there's a cat snoozing.
25.10.2025 01:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0"your halloween costume is sexy+your last google search"
which for me is apparently
SEXY CHEATING ON THE HARKNESS TEST
which is maybe... kinda redundant?
i mean sure you could do it by applying a bunch of effects too but you'd need a bunch of third-party plugins and it'd be really finicky :)
24.10.2025 23:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0feels more like a pattern brush to me :)
24.10.2025 23:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0awww yeah
24.10.2025 16:12 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Sounds like a good time really.
24.10.2025 02:02 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I keep on thinking I should fuck with Blender but god the learning cliff. And the prevalence of fucking video tutorials instead of books. Does Blorfartists do better there?
24.10.2025 00:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0with the right coat you can wear ANYTHING under it.
24.10.2025 00:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0eriously
23.10.2025 16:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Oh that's clever too.
191 jiffies for that, I bet that's the fastest one if I was doing it in 6502 assembly though. WHICH I AM NOT GONNA DO.
Nope! I'm just THAT GOOD at this kind of archaic puzzle-solving.
23.10.2025 16:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Illustrator, 21.5h. Commission.
More details on my blog: https://egypt.urnash.com/blog/2025/09/18/escape/
If you want something crazy like this I've got some room for that in my schedule, drop me a line at egypt@urnash.com and let me know you sent something with a reply/dm here. :)
Okay, I did check and they are indeed faster - the first one takes 134 jiffies (1/60 sec), the second takes 161. Both take a few less if the screen's not being scrolled. And *this* version takes a whopping 280.
The c64 is sllllooooooooowwwwww.
I didn't check but both should be faster than the obvious implementation of "for 1 to 100, if divisible by 3 then print fizz, if divisible by 5 print buzz, if neither then print the number, next" because those divisibility checks require multiple floating point operations - c64 Basic has no MOD.
23.10.2025 15:45 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Then I made it slightly sillier by just filling in an entire array before printing it. The weird structure of the loop on lines 2/3 is due to how c64 Basic skips everything on a line after a false IF.
I think this is slower than the first one, but I didn't check.
I read a "nerd fails interview by implementing FizzBuzz in the most arcane way possible" post on HN and decided to try implementing it in c64 basic in a slightly silly manner. I was hoping for a one-liner but failed.
23.10.2025 15:39 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0rowr
22.10.2025 23:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Godspeed, Bernie.
22.10.2025 23:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Good point.
22.10.2025 20:42 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I do, I'll have to go check them out, thanks! With a bunch of bungee cords in my bike basket to tie down a machine if I get one...
22.10.2025 20:42 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0oh wait, break a leg?
22.10.2025 20:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0good luck!
22.10.2025 20:39 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Halloween commission for Tazel. This was fun!
22.10.2025 17:57 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I *do* keep saying I should acquire a sewing machine and start making my own clothes given that I've been in NOLA for six years and still haven't found a vintage shop that has stuff that looks good on me.
22.10.2025 17:56 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0This morning I had a dream where I was looking in a mirror and was slimmer, curvier, and younger-looking, and yes please. Also I had on a dress with a neat B&W triangular pattern.
22.10.2025 17:52 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0