TBD Jones ⚧

Cis women in anti-trans religious communities are literally fucking medically transitioning, and the NYT buries this fact 1000s of words into the article.

is this sub-posting the new trans action group that has a name that implies it's a lot more than being a single issue action group to push trans acceptance in the shit show party?

A post from Will Stancill trolling DHS

DHS trying to troll Will Stancill

Grok rebutting DHS, saying Will Stancill is not a threat

A play in three acts

Was this point of law not one of those that the For Women Scotland case partially built a case from? Is this a step towards undoing that ruling?

I like that he knew that he couldn't say gender - despite the fact that women's health outcomes and treatment are so far below men's - because people would obviously point out his anti trans views. Another win for women's rights from the GC crowd

WILL GERMAN REUNIFICATION HURT TRANSSEXUAL RIGHTS? Now that East and West Germany are being united into one country, the laws concerning transsexuals and sex change operations are being re-evaluated. East Germany scores higher on transsexual rights than West Germany, but East Germany's more humane laws may not prevail in the new reunited country. As it stands now in East Germany, men and women 18 years and older have been able to receive govern-ment-sponsored sex reassignment surgery, get married and adopt children. According to Professor Goerlich of East Germany, who spoke at a meeting on the subject in Hamburg, in two cases a transsexual mother gained custody of her adopted children after a divorce. Goerlich plans to fight to retain these more liberal laws in the future Germany.

Posting this short article until morale improves.

does it still do the weird scrolling where a single click on the scroll wheel jerks you down the screen instantly, sometimes with zero overlapping content to the previous scroll position? i really wanted to use libre over Google docs but it was impossible to read any document

I haven't had time to read your other replies yet, but I think you ought to know this is the most skin crawlingly creepy thing you could have said, and it's even worse for the fact that you've added it as a completely unprompted footnote to your own post.

the bad news there is that from everything i've read the president has already blown up the economy, it's just that the economy's corpse is floating atop of the bubble. the good news is that day to day, the pres can hardly do anything to make it worse. but the bad news, oh, the bad news...

10. If yes, do you believe her imprisonment was transphobic?

11. If yes, why do you believe that your rhetoric isn't also transphobic?

9. Following on from 8, do you accept that the rhetoric that a non-declaration of transness is deception is the basis for the imprisonment of the actual, real life trans woman at the top of this thread?

8. Do you accept that by suggesting that trans people should always declare transness to all partners to avoid danger, that you are implying that trans people who don't are in some way responsible for ending up in dangerous scenarios?

7. Do you accept that a man may know that a trans person is trans and use the inherent fear of retributive violence in order to coerce a trans person into forms of sex that give both parties deniability about the trans person's transness? e.g. oral sex as a "safe" exit?

6. Do you accept that in a scenario in which a trans person is being asked by their partner if they are trans, and they believe they are at risk and cannot escape the scenario, denial may in fact be the safe option?

5. Do you accept that in that scenario, telling the other party that you're trans, especially in the highly transphobic society we live in, could place the trans person at great personal risk of assault or murder?

4. If no, do you accept that the situations in which people are most likely to agree to have sex with people they just met that most people are in a scenario in which they are more vulnerable to violence, e.g. outside at night, in a loud or dark club, in a 1 on 1 scenario?

3. Do you believe that transgender individuals should be excluded from having casual sex with people they have just met?

including lying by omission. so here's some questions for you.

1. Do you encourage all cisgender people to declare to all their sexual partners before sex that they are cisgender?

2. If no, why not?

I'm not stating an opinion, I'm stating a fact, plainly: you are transphobic. your opinion is that trans people need to, in all circumstances, tell their sexual partners that they're trans. they need to do this, allegedly, for their safety, and for the moral position that lying is wrong -

if you think avoiding masculine terms of address for trans women by default is "walking on egg shells", you're seriously telling on yourself.

I didn't say you did, I said it was the clear end point of your argument. PLEASE exercise your reading comprehension.

Dude is also not a genderless address, whatever you may believe. I'm open in my bio about being transfeminine. Please think about how you address people accusing you of transphobia

So what is your point? that you should tell your sexual partner for an evidentially false sense of security? for your own sense of moral superiority over those other trannies who are too scared of violence to confide to their sexual partner? gender fluidity isn't erasing your transphobia.

the criminalisation of lying is the clear end point of what you are arguing for. that you cannot see that is absolutely unbelievable, given that this is LITERALLY what happened??

not the point but thank you for the reminder you're still here, I always forget your profile pic isn't jigen any more

"I never said anything about the woman" you came into a discussion about an article talking about the woman. contextually, everything you say is in relation to this woman. give your head a wobble and understand what you are ACTUALLY talking about.

do you not understand how it reads?
the post:
"trans woman sentenced to 20 months in men's prison for not revealing she was trans before performing oral sex"
your reply:
"you should ALWAYS tell people you're having sex with that you're trans no matter what!"

so, to be clear, you are saying it is her fault that she's arrested, but that she shouldn't have been arrested, and you compare her situation to hers, despite the fact that you are committing a relationship to a one night stand for a woman who wanted to engage in consensual casual sex? okay

I hope you record these disclosure conversations or you're literally just as likely to be convicted, because *surprise*, there was no evidence either way to suggest she didn't disclose except both party's testimonies. but i'm glad you got to voice your approval for this woman's imprisonment.

trust that these shows have genuinely great gaffers who love the craft, I attended a talk by one of the HotD gaffers. but the people who guide the colorist towards the final grade don't give a shit. this is the look they genuinely want, despite it all

I've never interacted with the doll space account, and it has me blocked already. i do follow a lot of accounts that warn about LB, and that fact and this thread is all I can imagine that connects me to doll space. soooo