Congratulations to Joe Felsenstein on being awarded the 2026 Mendel Medal!
14.11.2025 12:41 β π 100 π 33 π¬ 0 π 2@seananderson.bsky.social
Assistant Prof at Georgia Tech. Computational biology π€ field biology. Evolutionary ecology π€ evolutionary genetics. Thinking about how one species splits into two. https://seanasanderson.github.io/
Congratulations to Joe Felsenstein on being awarded the 2026 Mendel Medal!
14.11.2025 12:41 β π 100 π 33 π¬ 0 π 2How are Pacific NW mountain birds responding to climate change?
I got up at 4:00 am for a month to find out.
but first the backstory, or "how I spent seven years telling everyone this project wasn't possible"
new paper here:
esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Check out our new paper in @royalsociety.org testing mechanisms behind elevational range restriction in tropical montane songbirds! β°οΈπ¦π³
Backstory: when i first visited Central America in the early 2010's i was struck with elevational ranges of birds..
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
And honestly, we all should aspire to and hope for more whimsy in our livesβitβs bleak out there
09.11.2025 15:47 β π 47 π 8 π¬ 2 π 0This is excellent
08.11.2025 21:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This obit of Watson is *amazing*.
08.11.2025 20:14 β π 93 π 42 π¬ 5 π 0It's irritating that they describe the effects of his racism as limited to causing controversy within science and reputational consequences for himself rather than giving an immeasurable boost, false veneer of legitimacy, and idiot-friendly prestige to modern scientific racism and eugenics.
07.11.2025 19:42 β π 248 π 72 π¬ 5 π 7The framing of this is hilarious: Democrats deeply worried about the repercussions of a victory
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/m...
Anyway, doing great this morning
02.11.2025 14:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thereβs not one more cruel, sadistic sports town anywhere. These teams excel at tempting you into hope. They drag you into deep water and drown you
02.11.2025 14:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I really thought Iβd seen it all in terms of the most depressing, soul-crushing, eye-watering failure that Toronto sports has to offer, but somehow I was wrong
02.11.2025 14:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0YES, SAVAGE!!!
30.10.2025 09:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excited to share our new paper where we find that the rise, decline and fall of clades is not explained by the usual suspects (diversity-dependence, ecological opportunities) but rather by species' insidious loss of macroevolutionary fitness: www.nature.com/articles/s41... 1/3
17.10.2025 09:12 β π 96 π 45 π¬ 2 π 2Itβs the green light on the dock across the bay?
17.10.2025 12:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0They donβt deserve it is what Iβm saying
17.10.2025 00:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The people in the apartment across the street from me have had their patio fan running continuously since January. Never seen them out there. Need to learn flashlight Morse code.
17.10.2025 00:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0My colleague @jameststroud.bsky.social is a fantastic scientist and an even better guy -- congrats James on this richly deserved recognition and research support!!
15.10.2025 14:45 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0New review out! With students in my lab, we explore how population size shapes speciationβfrom drift in small populations to selection in large ones. Do small or large populations speciate faster? The answer is more nuanced than you might think.
esj-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Human-mediated land-use and climate change occur simultaneously, but how do they interact to shape adaptive dynamics? Super excited to share the first paper from the Kreiner lab, led by postdoc extraordinaire @rpineau.bsky.social
06.10.2025 15:13 β π 64 π 19 π¬ 3 π 1Thanks Jesper!
13.10.2025 21:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We hope you find this paper and the phylopairs package useful. Please have a read and get in touch if questions arise.
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Finally, a major impediment to the comp analysis of LP traits has been a lack of ready-made tools for empiricists to deploy. To help on this front, I created the R package 'phylopairs', a tool entirely devoted to working with LP traits. Phylopairs encodes our method plus previous approaches
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0The paper goes into much more detail on our approach and a few other methods that have been used in the past. We also provide the first test of the performance of any of the methods that have been used in comparative analyses of LP traits, some of which turn out to be potentially problematic
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A major breakthrough for us was stumbling across Isserlis' theorem, which allows us to write the expected covariance among lineage-pairs in terms of the expected covariance among the component lineages (which we know if we have a tree).
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0From this basic assumption, we can derive metrics for the expected covariance among PAIRS of lineages. In effect, we convert a standard phylogenetic covariance matrix into a lineage-pair covariance matrix -- and we can use this to account for non-independence in comp. studies of lineage-pair traits
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Our basis for these expectations is the idea that C and D are similar in some trait(s) due to shared evolutionary history, and this affects the value of the LP traits measured for AC and AD. That is, we assume phylogenetic signal in some underlying character that affects the LP trait we care about
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Our answer is that, yes, as a NULL expect'n, AC and AD should be more similar to each other in an LP trait than either is to AB. E.g., if A has strong postzygotic RI w/ species C, then it prob. does so w/ D also. If A competes strongly for food w/ C, it prob does so w/ D as well (as a null expect'n)
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We start by considering the following tree. Six lineage-pairs can be derived from this tree, three of which are AB, AC, and AD. We ask: of those three pairs, would we expect any two to be more similar to each other than either is to the third in some continuous lineage-pair trait?
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0In this paper, we work to develop such models and show that they produce a βlineage-pair covariance matrixβ, an object that can be used to account for non-independence in downstream analyses in the same that way a βphylogenetic covariance matrixβ is used in comparative studies of speciesβ traits
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Like the traits of related species, the traits of related lineage pairs are non-independent. Unlike for the traits of species, we currently lack models for the structure of non-independence of lineage-pair traits, which makes it unclear how to account for their underlying covariance.
13.10.2025 18:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0