c̶r̶y̶p̶t̶i̶d̶'s Avatar

c̶r̶y̶p̶t̶i̶d̶

@cryptid-enthusiast.bsky.social

whatever works | 20’s | 🏳️‍🌈 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ wannabe writer that plays too many video games

31 Followers  |  34 Following  |  224 Posts  |  Joined: 21.11.2024  |  2.0524

Latest posts by cryptid-enthusiast.bsky.social on Bluesky

got hit with the tiktok ban hammer so im finally gonna figure out how Bluesky works ig

13.05.2025 13:22 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

🌟🏳️‍⚧️

10.05.2025 13:12 — 👍 10042    🔁 2871    💬 42    📌 14

I think she was hoping to get blocked first, she had a post laughing about being blocked by somebody else on this post 💀

30.01.2025 21:23 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

The fact she came in here, started throwing accusations around and then turned around and blocked me is honestly funny.

30.01.2025 21:14 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

What, that I have a life and responsibilities outside of social media? I’m not the one digging through threads looking for something to get upset about and claim some weird moral high ground over.

30.01.2025 21:11 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Girl YOU move along, you came in here and started pitching a fit.

30.01.2025 21:09 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

And my issue is you interjecting yourself into this thread, getting upset and accusing us of something you clearly made up on your own.

Like if you don’t like this conversation, check out of it at this point. You’re going through and picking fights with people throughout this post.

30.01.2025 21:07 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Because, again, it was just a discussion that talent is a thing that does exist?

30.01.2025 20:25 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Exactly like? If you love something it doesn’t matter if you’re “good” at it.

Besides art is entirely subjective, everybody’s idea of ‘good’ is different.

30.01.2025 20:06 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

We were discussing that talent is a thing that does exist, despite what a lot of artists claim, and that was it. There was nothing negative said, it sounds like you’re looking for something to upset yourself with.

30.01.2025 20:02 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

“Sometimes people are going to be better at things than you are” isn’t negative??? It’s just how being alive and existing works??

30.01.2025 19:59 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Which is fair. But sometimes people also need to be able to step back and go ‘was this actually said, or am I jumping to conclusions?’ As well. Because if you leave this thread upset, and giving up on something you claim to love, you were looking for something that was never even said.

30.01.2025 19:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Tbh if that’s the takeaway, that’s sort of on them because not once did anybody here say ‘you’ll never be good enough, just give up’? It was a convo abt the fact that yeah, sometimes people do have an inherent talent for things that others don’t.
That’s it.

30.01.2025 19:43 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Awwwww he blocked me 🥺

30.01.2025 17:43 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Just remember to come up for air while doing your diligent work under Trump’s desk, wouldn’t want to lose your last few brain cells to asphyxiation.

30.01.2025 17:30 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Remember kids, see something you don’t like? It’s just liberal propaganda!

Facts & information? Propaganda

Timelines of events? Propaganda

Science? Propaganda

ACTUAL propaganda?……that’s fine, apparently.

30.01.2025 17:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

HOW DARE PEOPLE USE BASIC FACTS AND TIMELINES, DONT YOU KNOW THAT’S JUST PROPAGANDA

30.01.2025 17:19 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Guys is it liberal propaganda to…list a timeline of events?

30.01.2025 17:10 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Microsoft Probing If DeepSeek-Linked Group Improperly Obtained OpenAI Data Microsoft Corp. and OpenAI are investigating whether data output from OpenAI’s technology was obtained in an unauthorized manner by a group linked to Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek, ...

Gosh, sounds like fair use to me. It's not like OpenAI / Microsoft cared one bit about licenses or copyright when they absorbed my entire legal blog into their LLMs via Common Crawl. Why should their probabilistic LLM outputs get better copyright protection than my original human work?

29.01.2025 12:45 — 👍 2870    🔁 437    💬 67    📌 24

Sorry all graphic designers out there that’s ever put time into designing something for companies, your work is actually a pointless waste of time because this AI guy says so :/ yeah so you deserve to lose your job.

Get over yourself.

29.01.2025 13:43 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

And im giving up here, because it’s obvious you don’t actually have a grasp what art is, or what it means to create it. All you can connect in your thick skull is ‘cut corners steal work make profit’.

29.01.2025 13:39 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Even artists making art “for profit” STILL express themselves through it. They *care* about the process, & what they make. People who animate for movies/video games, writers, designers, they still love creating.
Which is proof again, you aren’t an artist. You’re an AI shill that’s deluded himself.

29.01.2025 13:37 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Because all you can boil your argument down to is ‘ai good make more money’ while ignoring the larger issues at hand.
And AI DOES steal, which you clearly don’t give a shit about either. Not if you make a profit off it.

29.01.2025 13:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I genuinely do not give a fuck how complicated you think using AI is, at the end of the day it is still AI doing the majority of the heavy lifting. It is still AI doing the creating.

29.01.2025 13:32 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Again, we’re on a different moral stance that art needs to be something cut down in the name of capitalism. You seem to think it’s fine that there are going to be fewer artists, and that art itself is going to become soulless AI garbage because it’s efficient, and im not. I never WILL be ok with it

29.01.2025 13:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Like you realize you are part of the problem, right? You being on the side of the tech industry to cut out artists in the name of making a profit is killing the arts.
It’s the same argument used in favor of replacing VA’s with AI, or genAI to write book after book. All in the name of speed and $

29.01.2025 03:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You are using generative AI to get a final product, you are not creating art. You are using AI, which is creating the final piece, please for the love of god learn the fucking difference.

29.01.2025 03:48 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

So you’re not an artist, you’re a shill using a machine that steals art from others to make a profit. Just unfortunate that it’s people like you that will take jobs from actual artists that give a shit.

29.01.2025 03:46 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

🤷 you can be angry and hate that this is happening at all, without wasting empathy on the ones that brought it on themselves. I’ll worry and mourn the families hurt by this that didnt actively vote to make it happen.
The rest are on their own.

29.01.2025 02:42 — 👍 9    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

“I thought they were just trying to get CRIMINALS out” is a pretty big giveaway who she voted for. That’s their go-to answer “I thought he meant ___”

29.01.2025 02:29 — 👍 11    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

@cryptid-enthusiast is following 19 prominent accounts