Mariska Leeflang's Avatar

Mariska Leeflang

@mariskaleeflang.bsky.social

Professor in Clinical epidemiology, with a focus on medical tests and diagnostic test accuracy #SystematicReviews. Interested in #reproducibility of science. osiris4r.eu #AcademicSky #EpiSky

2,575 Followers  |  450 Following  |  114 Posts  |  Joined: 08.10.2023  |  1.7776

Latest posts by mariskaleeflang.bsky.social on Bluesky

Iemand in (de buurt) van Utrecht die wil en kan?

16.10.2025 14:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Zoek de verschillen

16.10.2025 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Energy requirements for AI mean that the only way for the bubble not to burst would require companies to multiply their carbon footprint to an unimaginable degree. Right now, while AI is barely functional and mostly a novelty for the lazy, it requires so much energy that data centers rival cities.

09.10.2025 11:11 β€” πŸ‘ 388    πŸ” 142    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 7
Preview
Nominate an Impactful Dataset You are invited to nominate a dataset to be included in a commentary about the impact of Earth, space, and environmental data using the dimensions of people, planet, and prosperity. Selected submitter...

⭐️Nominate an Impactful Dataset

@agu.org invites you to nominate an impactful dataset!

πŸ“ŠSubmissions will be considered for inclusion in an upcoming featured commentary published in AGU Advances.

Submit nominations by 20 October.

docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

@agubiogeosciences.bsky.social

05.10.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
PubPeer - Evaluation of the evidence on acetaminophen use and neurodev... There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Evaluation of the evidence on acetaminophen use and neurodevelopmental disorders using the Navigation Guide methodology (2025)

I have just left a lengthy Pubpeer comment on the autism/Tylenol study being cited by the Trump administration. There appear to be a number of fairly straightforward errors in the paper.

pubpeer.com/publications...

01.10.2025 05:03 β€” πŸ‘ 154    πŸ” 50    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 2

Great idea!
@ingestegeman.bsky.social

24.09.2025 16:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
AI schaadt wetenschappelijke integriteit en vergroot kansenongelijkheid, waarschuwen wetenschappers - ScienceGuide De wetenschappelijke integriteit staat op het spel nu universiteiten kunstmatige intelligentie zonder kritische bezinning omarmen. Dat is de waarschuwing van een internationale groep van zestien weten...

"De wetenschappelijke integriteit staat op het spel nu universiteiten [AI] zonder kritische bezinning omarmen. Dat is de waarschuwing van een internationale groep van achttien wetenschappers, onder leiding van onderzoekers van de Radboud Universiteit.”

www.scienceguide.nl/2025/09/ai-s... 1/🧡

18.09.2025 21:02 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

Ah, looking for UMC helps! (I looked for 'med') Thanks. But that still reveals only 5 names.

Anyway, good to further promote it! Will do so.

19.09.2025 10:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Very interesting reading! I am surprised that no one from the medical sciences signed yet...

19.09.2025 09:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users β€” in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users β€” in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI (black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf. Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. 2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Finally! 🀩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n

06.09.2025 08:13 β€” πŸ‘ 3133    πŸ” 1590    πŸ’¬ 98    πŸ“Œ 253
Preview
Trials Methodologist/ Senior Trials Methodologist (Statistics) in Sutton | The Institute of Cancer Research View details and apply for this Trials Methodologist/ Senior Trials Methodologist (Statistics) vacancy in Sutton. Salary : Commencement on the salary range is subject to comparable skills an...

We're currently looking for a Trials Methodologist/Senior Trials Methodologist to join our team.

You can find out more about the role and how to apply here:
jobs.icr.ac.uk/vacancies/13...

#ResearchJobs #TrialsMethodologyπŸ§ͺ

17.09.2025 08:26 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia

New people are signing our open letter almost everyday, and it is so heartening to see. Especially good to see familiar names sign.

openletter.earth/open-letter-...

16.09.2025 20:54 β€” πŸ‘ 88    πŸ” 39    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 7
Preview
Drummond Rennie (1936-2025), in his own words Drummond Rennie I first became aware of the work of Drummond Rennie almost by accident: By borrowing his office. It was the summer of 1997, and as a rising fourth-year medical student, I was spendi…

Drummond Rennie (1936-2025), in his own words

Rennie, who died on September 12, was a towering figure in scientific publishing, known for promoting improved standards in medical journals, and for organizing the first Peer Review Congress, held in 1989, and every four years since.

15.09.2025 19:56 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 4

Time for our annual update of "Open Research across disciplines".
pdf: www.ukrn.org/disciplines/
K Reproducibility Network (UKRN) webpages: www.ukrn.org/disciplines/

Resources to add, please use (by 30/09/25): docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

@camillakgilmore.bsky.social @priyasilverstein.com

16.09.2025 10:19 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I've just updated my preprint on short personal reviews of novels on hashtag#ResearchIntegrity bit.ly/409E5ff
Please attend me to novels which you believe to belong to this list, but are not yet included.
The preprint recently also has been published in a Chinese journal: bit.ly/3K6P17B

17.09.2025 06:30 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hey everyone, I'm hoping to get some sense from academics on what kind of financial support (if any) they get from their university/college employers for conference travel. Please chime in and repost if willing.

08.09.2025 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0

A @bmj.com RCT is comparing effects of use of an #OpenScience checklist on provision of study protocols, code, data, more. Too early to assess reproducibility FX!
@mariskaleeflang.bsky.social @ingestegeman.bsky.social
@floriannaudet.bsky.social @mlrethlefsen.bsky.social @amsterdamumc.bsky.social

05.09.2025 15:54 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO assessment of health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, an introduction

For you editors, systematic reviewers, and SR commissioners out there: our latest reflections on what works in large-scale SR projects to support international policy (it's basically, comms, practice, protocols, researcher buy-in). www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

29.08.2025 09:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

To be honest, I am not sure if this difference is gonna make a real change in scientific quality...

22 sentences is really not that longg (although the length and complexity of the sentences may also be longer)
And information score only slightly more than standard 0.52 vs 0.46)....

04.09.2025 06:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Menopause misinformation is harming care Symptoms should be prioritised ahead of testing A societal transformation of attitudes and beliefs surrounding menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has outpaced provider education, leaving primary care s...

Menopause misinformation is harming care www.bmj.com/content/390/...

"Routine hormone panel testing in the management of menopause symptoms is not supported by current evidence and does not improve care..."

Normalisation of testing part of "larger problem: the commercialisation of women’s health"

26.08.2025 15:49 β€” πŸ‘ 48    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

+1 year ago we limited manuscript submissions to 4 per author p/y @accountabilityair.bsky.social, but overall, submissions have grown anyway. I wonder if the NIH would face the same challenge.

18.07.2025 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

thrilled that our guides for #OpenScience in developing countries is now published in AMPPS of @psychscience.bsky.social: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Please see the thread for details

19.08.2025 12:06 β€” πŸ‘ 32    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everything you want to know about gender, intersectionality and health in the climate crisis. And how to research this. Free download of the book and a free coloring page ⬇️

20.01.2025 07:32 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

It has been a fantastic final for an interesting week.
Thanks to all OSIRIS partners! You are a great crowd. Really engaged and very friendly.

05.07.2025 14:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

🚨Out now! #OSIRIS Ten Tales of #Reproducibility🚨
πŸ”¬These tales bring you real-world stories of how researchers, journals, funders & institutions are making reproducible science a reality!

πŸ‘‰Dive into the interactive flipbook: buff.ly/YsSsG2C

#TrustInScience #OpenScience

03.07.2025 09:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

🚨Out now! #OSIRIS Ten Tales of #Reproducibility🚨

πŸ”¬These tales bring you real-world stories of how researchers, journals, funders & institutions are making reproducible science a reality!

πŸ‘‰Dive into the interactive flipbook: buff.ly/YsSsG2C

#TrustInScience #OpenScience

23.06.2025 15:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The Emerging Infections Subcommittee launches ESCMID-AUMC Epi Alert! Aiming for weekly publication, these reports aim to provide summaries on emerging infections for busy healthcare professionals w/ direct links for further investigation & transparency. ow.ly/5Rrj50WcejS

#IDSky #clinmicro

20.06.2025 09:53 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A really great course, not only for those who are attending as a participant, but also for the teachers. Every year has been a learning experience to me!

This year will be in Athens!

18.06.2025 08:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Dit plaatje hebben we ook in het Nederlands nodig. #sepsis (alhoewel we de sepsis van mijn dochter er niet mee herkend hadden)

11.01.2025 08:06 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
MetaArXiv Preprint title: "Adversarial reanalysis and the challenge of open data in regulatory science" by Bennett McIntosh, Nicole Nelson, and Kelsey Ichikawa

MetaArXiv Preprint title: "Adversarial reanalysis and the challenge of open data in regulatory science" by Bennett McIntosh, Nicole Nelson, and Kelsey Ichikawa

I have a new preprint out w/ @nicolecnelson.bsky.social & Kelsey Ichikawa!

We focus on EPA regulatory transparency policies between '17 and '21 but wow is it relevant to current policies on #openscience, #opendata, including this weekend's "gold standard #science" EO

πŸ“„ osf.io/preprints/me...

🧡‡️

26.05.2025 15:41 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

@mariskaleeflang is following 20 prominent accounts