Evidence time changes are bad.
15.11.2025 00:52 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@djsplift.bsky.social
Evidence time changes are bad.
15.11.2025 00:52 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Might be the blowing-bubba thing
15.11.2025 00:50 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Now we know why Trump liked the name Big Beautiful Bill.
14.11.2025 23:24 โ ๐ 26 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0I doubt the DOJ copies are fully intact at this point.
12.11.2025 23:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Drove up into sequoia national park after charging up to 100% in Fresno. Wound up with 50% battery when we got there. Stayed a week. Left with about 40% & arrived at that same charger in Fresno with like 43% due to the regenerative braking.
12.11.2025 00:19 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ha! โPlanโ
10.11.2025 22:38 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0His net worth is intrinsically tied to his Tesla shares. Tesla value is intrinsically tied to him being the CEO. Seems like heโs trapped to me. But he owns 15%+ of the vote, so heโs only gotta convince ~35% if 100% vote; probably significantly less.
05.11.2025 23:34 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0They love a convert. Seems likely to be his plan.
04.11.2025 22:34 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0USDA has money though right? So the cruelty & irresponsibility is manufactured by just the one side that actually has all the power.
27.10.2025 15:00 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Not so much gibberish as subterfuge.
25.10.2025 15:16 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โHereโs a link to a video where he says exactly whatโs in the Canada ad, but since you wonโt listen to it, itโs evidence that he didnโt say it.โ
24.10.2025 13:56 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thereโs a few competing bad reasons:
1) For domestic use
2) For international use
3) For enrichment of cronies
I think the people whoโd cheer spending tax dollars that way, as Trump is, are disconnected from the reality of the largest part of the population.
The jokes a couple of months ago were โlet them eat ballroom.โ Itโs the same type of expenditure to undo.
Fun is good
17.10.2025 04:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0How bout all them wild text messages from the Young Republicans?!
15.10.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 691 ๐ 245 ๐ฌ 28 ๐ 27Are you supposed to be the blue anon? Or is the list maker the blue anon?
15.10.2025 23:10 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0More of a judgement on Trump, Abbott, etc.
We admire his trolling
Might be they keep showing pawpaw videos and he doesnโt know what reality is.
09.10.2025 22:12 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0And John Fetterman
09.10.2025 20:41 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Beaten by the puppy bowl.
08.10.2025 17:00 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The Speaker of the House has firm views that Bad Bunny is a terrible pick for singing at the Super Bowl, but hasn't had time to watch the President's speech to our military leadership or form an opinion whether furloughed federal workers should be paid or Illinois' governor should be thrown in jail.
08.10.2025 15:50 โ ๐ 9619 ๐ 2610 ๐ฌ 277 ๐ 136And it will purchase no real favor. Every bit of groveling only buys temporary reprieve.
07.10.2025 19:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Chuck Grassley thinking about his political future. lol
07.10.2025 15:24 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Fighting off the woke mind virus is gonna be so hardcore!
07.10.2025 03:26 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I chose biographies of the presidents for my deep-dive learning. Currently on the second volume of Franklin Pierce by Peter Wallner. I expect to have real problems getting through the Teddy Roosevelt (Morris) and LBJ (Caro).
07.10.2025 03:06 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Doing things is ugh. I have the excuse of living ~30 miles from SF and its events, but I work there, so not really.
05.10.2025 23:58 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โฆpain as a crucible, but I think they are otherwise dissimilar. The first seeks to create pain and chaos it cannot predict to reach its goal; the second accepts pain, and is reactive to its reality, examining & informed by the past, it prefers a different path than the one that created the present
03.10.2025 23:26 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0So the publicโs past response informs the future, but thereโs not really a comparison between choosing to suffer the worse leader and viola get better government, and refusing to bail out the bad leader, whoโs been elected, so the consequences for that choice are felt. Both arguments see collectiveโฆ
03.10.2025 23:26 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Some calamity upon Trumpโs reelection was predictable and the political will to let the public suffer consequences is low.
Second, the close call of trumpโs reelection in 2020 was based largely on the back of those stimulus checks & so was his rehabilitation to the point of reelection in โ24.
No; but I think comparing the two is a fallacy.
First, exerting control over the future that thereโd be no bailouts in the trump over Harris scenario ignores reality that shouldโve been challenged in that argument. But I mostly see those whoโd make the argument as unserious.