Hippo pool? ;) (Imagine the crocodile as reviewer 2)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLZH...
@zeronoiselab.bsky.social
Lab @ ESI Frankfurt. We believe the brain is noise-free. Or mostly-noise-free-ish. And that if we stare at behaving brains long enough, it will ALL MAKE SENSE.
Hippo pool? ;) (Imagine the crocodile as reviewer 2)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLZH...
I have the pleasure of speaking at ESI-SyNC this year about the neurophenomenology of breathwork and DMT π§ β¨
Do come if you can!
Does sensitivity to acute pain correlate with mental health?
In our new paper led by @rebeccaboe.bsky.social & @francescafardo.bsky.social we analyzed thermal pain thresholds in 565 adults and found no link to mental health symptoms.
π doi.org/10.1080/1061...
Delighted to be back to Ernst StrΓΌngmann Institute to learn and present at what should be an amazing meeting on psychedelics and consciousness
www.esi-frankfurt.de/newevent/
Registration is 100 Euro (free for PhDs & postdocs).
Find out more!
esi-frankfurt.de/newevent/
Go register!
survey.academiccloud.de/index.php/18...
@mikaelpalner.bsky.social @torbenott.bsky.social @bita137.bsky.social @marcwittmann.bsky.social @evanlhealey.bsky.social @christimmermann.bsky.social
What shifts in our brain when our consciousness shifts? On Sept 8-9, we will explore this question at ESI-SyNC 2025 - with exciting talks, posters and discussions on the neural dynamics of altered consciousness, from psychedelics to breathwork, near-death experiences and meditation.
(1/2)
βTop-down and bottom-up neuroscience: overcoming the clash of research culturesβ
doi.org/10.1038/s415...
Small contribution in this piece by @frosas.bsky.social and colleagues on how we need both types of research culture in neuroscience.
#neuroskyence
Sweet, sweet review by the awesome @anne-urai.bsky.social on the beautiful mess that is behaviour.
Also, best abstract ending I've seen in a long time:
'There is probably no such thing as stable behavior.'
Check it out!
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
ππ
28.06.2025 18:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A study of rhesus macaques in July found that those who communicated more clearly with their facial expressions made better leaders: phys.org/news/2024-07...
Couldn't help but think of how this guy must be a great leader.
As highlighted by @altmetric.com, #Bluesky keeps trending up, regularly beating #X/Twitter for research sharing, all with just 36M users compared to X's claimed 600M. Imagine achieving that without the spam and toxic mess. Honestly, what are you waiting for?
#ResearchSky #AcademicSky #SocialMedia
Or in German: 'Studentenfutter' (student feed) π
17.06.2025 13:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excited to share this project specifying a research direction I think will be particularly fruitful for theory-driven cognitive science that aims to explain natural behavior!
We're calling this direction "Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science"
Super kick-ass talk by @anna-beyeler.bsky.social on dopamine signalling and anxiety just now at the 12th SBDM (Symposium on the Biology of Decision Making)! π±π€―π₯³
16.06.2025 13:36 β π 8 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1Yaaay, congrats Alex! π€©
14.06.2025 06:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Did their own hand feel rubbery?
#catchtrials
#demandcharacteristics
:-)
Shout-out to the kick-ass team that made this project such a joy: Model magician Alejandro Tlaie, video wizard @hummuscience.bsky.social , mouse & monkey whisperers Rob Taylor, Katharine Shapcott and PA Ferracci, VR maven Mina Glukhova and master of neurobehavioural math @jpillowtime.bsky.social .
10.06.2025 11:21 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The one clear difference we found between species? Monkeys stick to each face state more consistently, while mice bounce around between states more often and more randomly. (6/7)
10.06.2025 11:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This relation held on a single-trial level: Just by looking at their faces, we could predict reliably if mice and monkeys were going to succeed in the upcoming trial - and how fast they would do so (5/7)
10.06.2025 11:21 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Over time, different facial features were most predictive, forming alternating βface statesβ. Amazingly, these face states mapped neatly onto trial success, even though the model didnβt know trial outcomes! In short: Facial expressions track cognitive performance states (4/7)
10.06.2025 11:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We then analysed their facial expressions pre-trial to predict their reaction speed per trial. First things first: it worked! Facial expressions predicted upcoming reaction times - in monkeys and in mice! (3/7)
10.06.2025 11:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The way we process the world keeps spontaneously shifting - from focused, to daydreaming, to hasty, and so on. How do such spontaneous cognitive shifts operate across species? To find out, we let mice and monkeys play the same immersive VR foraging task. (2/7)
10.06.2025 11:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Now out in @natcomms.nature.comβ¬: Mice and monkeys spontaneously shift through comparable cognitive states - and it's written all over their faces! (1/7)
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Eatsalotl and Eatsalitl
15.05.2025 01:36 β π 61 π 9 π¬ 2 π 0Ha, challenge accepted! ππ
06.05.2025 08:06 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Sorry I'll stop replying in memes... it's just that... words fail. π€―
03.05.2025 18:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Uuuuuuuh I wann steal this one! π
03.05.2025 18:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 03/5) The real mechanism for credibility in science is simply the test of time:
Can someone reproduce the results?
Do others build on the findings?
Real rigour in science comes from waiting to see whether a result holds and leads to new results.
Period - that's it. It's not peer review.