What a freaking sorry excuse for the leader. The answer is a straight “Yes” but he’s got to try (try!) to be clever. If the Dems get the House, I hope to hell he’s not the leader.

Indeed! California, for example, should send zero Republican reps to Congress.

Confusing post

Bullshit headline

@kristenwelker.bsky.social carrying water for Nazis.

Kristen, do you think your money and fame will protect you from ICE?

I try to be a realist about these things, but I find it hard to fathom why no one at DOJ has fallen on their sword and leaked the full unredacted files documenting a global conspiracy. Fear of assassination?

Citizens of Minneapolis should find and detain him. Citizens’ arrest!

Find him

Find him

Shitty argument. Even if Trump was effective / legitimate on domestic matters, he’d still be impeachable on foreign ones.

Then organize marches and strikes.

Need a national wealth tax with a confiscatory lump-sum “fee” for those who leave.

Most Americans continue to favor raising taxes on corporations, higher-income households Democrats are overwhelmingly supportive of raising taxes on these groups, while Republicans are more divided.

www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/...

thehill.com/business/eco...

🤷

Data?

If the FT prints bullshit, then the FT is bullshit.

News Team, Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier. I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity. Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one. We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story. If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we

have effectively handed them a "kill switch" for any reporting they find inconvenient. If the standard for airing a story becomes "the government must agree to be interviewed," then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast. We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state. These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless. CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that "low point." By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones.

We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it. When it fails to air without a credible explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of "Gold Standard" reputation for a single week of political quiet. I care too much about this broadcast to watch it be dismantled without a fight. Sharyn

Per NY Times’s Michael Grynbaum on X, this is Sharyn Alfonsi’s email to her “60 Minutes” colleagues in full:

Utterly predictable (and predicted) by anyone who actually understands what’s going on in those models, which excludes the richest tech bros in the planet.

It’s hard to combat the dangerousness of the right by participating in a platform rigged by a white supremacist. 🤷

Articles like that should be considered in-kind campaign contributions and fully disclosed as such. “We support the felon Trump with this article.”

🤷

Make every state delegation (at least - really should be national) elected proportionally.

And, of course, that THIS SCOTUS speaks for the “right” people.

😡

Narrator: “He does not.”

LOL 😂 “Full benefits,” in this economy?

Best Onion article ever.

Stoller is an idiot, isn’t he?

What is it about these idiots and their inability to stay on message?

Why aren’t they being dragged in front of some Bar proceeding?

While there’s still a Senate and California has 2 seats in it, the House should be bluey blue blue blue.

I hope Comey wins his case, at great personal expense.

I hope Greene loses... whatever it is she's trying to win... at great expense to the Republicans.

LOL. Before techbros light more money on fire to develop AGI, I'd settle for General Human Intelligence.

Their only source is Fox, so it will work.