She is an unhinged activist who aggressively attack adversaries (to say the least). It's ridiculous to claim harassment for screenshots of public posts under all circumstances, but in her case is even worse.

He is just linking a fine Singal text without any comment and thinking this is some kind of "proof". He never read it.

I was going to answer your other post, but this is so much nicer. Yes, I plan to protect trans people whenever I can. I also support trans care and people's liberty to choose their identities and path.

Have a wonderful Sunday.

It's so sad you can't get Singal banned... My thoughts and prayers are with you.

And thank you. Have a nice day!

I am so honored you think I am a US journalist. English isn't even my native language.

Like when people here posted his allegedly home address after claiming false and inflammatory stuff? That is super safe and well meaning.

Lol, here we go.

You are changing the subject with another nonsense argument. Tell me: is it "bloodthirsty" to wish the death or threat someone? What about baseless career ending public accusation, like being a pedophile? Who is bloodthirsty in this site?

Lol, private e-mails asking for corrections are harassment, but smearing publicly Singal as pedophile, publicly wishing or threatening his death are just fine and common in this hellhole.

The fun thing is the lack of answers.

Nobody ever gave a real answer to what he did to break the TOS, but they call him a pedophile in this site all the time just for fun.

BTW, how is the JK Rowling campaign going? I hear her reputation is destroyed and she can't even publish again. Is this true?

Lol, Singal does not need any help from me, I am just someone who has been following the saga for almost ten years.

I am so happy your creepy multi year campaign to kill his credibility never worked, and I like to come here to see you fail over and over again.

Lol.

Lol

Your post makes absolutely no sense. Asking for corrections by email is not bloodthirsty, asking Singal to kill himself or threatening to brake his legs, like people do frequently here is.

What are you talking about, Singal mostly writes about research, researchers, care standards and so on. The stalking story is just idiotic.

What do you mean by "bloodthirsty"? People wishing death or threatening someone?

Oh no, that's what Singal gets all the time here, only you don't care.

Crucifíxus étiam pro nobis sub Póntio Piláto;
passus et sepúltus est,
et resurréxit tértia die, secúndum Scriptúras,
et ascéndit in cælum, sedet ad déxteram Patris.
Et íterum ventúrus est cum glória,
iudicáre vivos et mórtuos,
cuius regni non erit finis.

BTW, exploration and assessment is not "conversion therapy".

- "kids are being rushed to drugs"

Decide:
1) no, there is throughout assessment and needs persistent disphoria, you are wrong
2) anything else is conversion therapy

If you defend (1), and a lot activists do, you agree with Singal.

BTW, what is "the substance"? I see none. I would love to respond!

Sure, Invalid Hamdle.

Yes, this account is exclusive for, from time to time, check out the deranged comments about Singal here.

It is fun to me the narratives you create to justify the unbelievable hate for someone so bland as Singal.

Tell me the very serious and good report that he failed to cover. He did not cover good evidence because there is none.

All reviews of evidence showed weak evidence, even the one done by John Hopkins for WPATH that was blocked from publishing. Subsequent facts showed he had a legitimate perspective

Drank a glass of water.
- Transphobe!
Went home
- Transphobe!
Rescued a dog
- Transphobe!

You lot has no credibility. You can't even point to me what Singal wrote that is transphobic.

The most controversial thing Singal ever wrote is "hu, guys, the evidence for some treatments for kids is somewhat weak. We should be careful" and you guys are running in circles after 10 years.

He is blandest of writers and a true liberal. You can't possibly deal with the average American.

You just can't leave him alone, can you. When are you going to understand that going against a milquetoast liberal who writes bland pieces about gender medicine is only hurting you?

The most controversial thing he ever wrote is that evidence is weak and he has been right about it.

You mean a technical post from a substack about a study cited in a amicus brief in *Skrmetti*? Ridiculous.

You have no argument if the post was right or wrong, nor about the consequences.

If something generated a response, the problem is the fsct, not the report on it.

Are the Bluesky weirdos going to pivot away from crazy accusations against Singal without any basis? This is the interesting question.

Looks just like any other here.