Bill Belichick and Hulu's documentary to chronicle his first year at UNC has been canceled. Heh.
www.msn.com/en-us/sports...
@katefromnyc.bsky.social
#bluecrew Not a lawyer
Bill Belichick and Hulu's documentary to chronicle his first year at UNC has been canceled. Heh.
www.msn.com/en-us/sports...
Obviously not the main point here, but it's interesting how this is framed as content rather than policy.
"BREAKING" is typically what journalists or influencers say when they have a big story -- not what government officials say when they launch "undercover" operations
Another indication that these people are terminally online and increasingly disconnected from the real world.
07.10.2025 21:32 β π 136 π 25 π¬ 5 π 0NEW: Supreme Court likely to strike down Colorado's conversion therapy ban.
A lesson in how defining the case often resolves the case.
Today at Law Dork:
All year, weβve seen this administration treat appropriations bills less as laws-to-follow and more like Lucy playing football with Charlie Brown. What should make this moment any different? www.doomsdayscenario.co/p/there-is-n...
07.10.2025 14:28 β π 243 π 111 π¬ 10 π 16Very good piece by @vermontgmg.bsky.social
07.10.2025 19:12 β π 87 π 24 π¬ 2 π 2NYT headline: "Bow to the Emperor: We asked 50 Legal Experts About the Trump Presidency."
Pie chart showing over 50% of surveyed legal experts saying that Trump's second term has posed "much more threat" to the rule of law "than I expected."
Everything that's wrong with legal journalism in one New York Times headline and pie chart.
If all these "legal experts" are so shocked by the threats to the rule of law, maybe they're not the experts we should be asking in the first place.
All of this was foreseeable. Many forecast it.
Well done by @whitehouse.senate.gov
07.10.2025 21:21 β π 304 π 86 π¬ 9 π 6Bingo. As soon as I heard Homeland was claiming they were after "Tren de Aragua", I said, "Hold on, that's a landlord scam, who owns that building? Who might want all the tenants out?"
Racism in the service of crony capitalism.
southsideweekly.com/federal-agen...
The building is in a 27 million dollar foreclosure filed by Wells Fargo. The next day, Wells Fargo filed an emergency motion for receivership. The fascist regime kindly emptied the building for donor Wells Fargo.
The same Wells Fargo that had to pay out $3 billion dollars in settlements for signing customers up for accounts and paid services without their permission.
In an industry where shitty behavior is the baseline, they really go above and beyond.
Yes, Wells Fargo was a horrible company long before Trump's fascism. I heard consumer advocate, Clark Howard, declare on his podcast that Wells Fargo is a criminal enterprise masquerading as a bank. Remember, banks are beholden to shareholders, credit unions are beholden to their members.
07.10.2025 17:14 β π 480 π 131 π¬ 14 π 6On that. bsky.app/profile/seth...
07.10.2025 17:30 β π 87 π 19 π¬ 0 π 0Sounds similar to the Aurora, CO slumlord who helped create the βVenezurlan gangs have taken over entire apartment complexesβ talking point in 2024.
07.10.2025 17:29 β π 204 π 69 π¬ 6 π 7want to close your Wells Fargo account because you want to punish them for siccing ICE on a building of impoverished immigrants that Wells Fargo execs wanted to foreclose and sell?
here's how
4/7
If this were really about crime, thereβd be warrants, hearings, charges. Instead thereβs silence, smoke, and smashed doors. A long drawn out foreclosure instantly turns into a corporate asset to Wells Fargo. A community disappears. And no one in power calls it what it is, state-sponsored theft.
2/7
Imagine 300 federal agents descending on a single building at dawnβ¦ helicopters, flashbangs, families dragged out half-dressed. By sunrise, every unitβs empty. By sunset, the bank steps in. Wells Fargo gets receivership. Who ordered it and why? I am just asking questions.
1/7
What if billionaire donors had a problem property-foreclosed,losingπ° & wanted it cleared overnight?Normally that takes months in court. But what if all it took now was right meme coin transfer?Who would put it past them?
#Voices4Victory #DemVoice1 #USDemocracy
southsideweekly.com/federal-agen...
So they have no case. Other prosecutors declined to charge him,bolstering idea that Comey was targeted & highlighting weakness experienced prosecutors saw in the case. Senior DOJ leaders voiced skepticism & no career prosecutor was willing to present it to a grand jury.
#USDemocracy #Voices4Victory
How is it not news, according to the @nytimes.com, that an ICE agent in Chicago said "do something bitch" and deliberately SHOT a United States citizen? Can someone answer that question for me? @toddgregory.bsky.social @peterbakernyt.bsky.social @kenvogel.bsky.social @risenc.bsky.social
07.10.2025 22:37 β π 439 π 160 π¬ 12 π 3Alt text: A man in camouflage clothing and a face covering sits inside a gray Jeep, pointing a weapon out of the open driver-side window. The gun is aimed directly at the camera. The man wears gloves and a dark cap, and his eyes are visible above the mask. The vehicleβs door and side mirror are wet with raindrops.
ICE is a hostile occupying force that is a danger to everyone.
07.10.2025 22:18 β π 1768 π 512 π¬ 58 π 34US immigration system: *literally has a way for cubans to become residents just by being here a year & a day with some other conditions, where approval says "CUBAN REFUGEE" as it's about conditions in Cuba, baked into the law*
Also US immigration system: we need a full trial on Cuban asylum cases
I am not a constitutional scholar but I am pretty sure βthe president my personally levy taxes and choose what they fundβ is not in fact what the founders intended
07.10.2025 20:23 β π 1813 π 299 π¬ 15 π 14Dunno guys maybe states should stop paying federal taxes weird no one has come up with a plan for this obviously no one saw this coming it was impossible to predict
07.10.2025 19:16 β π 827 π 157 π¬ 22 π 5This case, however, is about hate crimes, not hate speech. Violent physical assaults are βnot by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.β Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 484 (1993). And it is well established that Congress may account for racially discriminatory motives when penalizing criminal conduct, as it did in the hate crimes laws at issue here. See id. at 487β88 (upholding a law that imposed enhanced penalties for crimes committed βbecause ofβ race). While Hudak was entitled to possess despicable Nazi symbols, the jury was entitled to consider that fact when deciding whether he assaulted J.D. and J.S. because of their race, color, and national origin. How much meaning to assign the Nazi memorabilia was ultimately a question of weight, not admissibility. But we see no abuse of discretion in the district courtβs conclusion that Hudak βopened the door to it[],β regardless of whether it would initially have been admissible. Birchette, 908 F.3d at 61.
4th Cir. holds it was no prejudicial error for jury to consider evidence of Nazi memorabilia possessed by a man accused of racially motivated assaults on a Mexican-American man and a black man, particularly after defendant mentioned his collection on the stand.
www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244...
"Mr. Defendant, what kind of collection do you--"
*interrupting* "I HAPPEN TO BE A COLLECTOR OF SPECIFICALLY NAZI AND CONFEDERATE HISTORY"
He's now been pardoned, but unbelievable that this happened at all in the first place: Tunisia sentenced a man to *death* last week for criticizing the president on Facebook.
07.10.2025 19:44 β π 337 π 59 π¬ 14 π 8Weβre getting very used to this but the statement is unusually unhinged.
07.10.2025 21:22 β π 1646 π 324 π¬ 100 π 9