Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.'s Avatar

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.

@annepmitchell.bsky.social

Attorney βš–οΈ Law Professor πŸŽ“ Federal Law Author πŸ–‹ Legislative Advisor πŸ“£ "You are a goddess rockstar of the highest order." - Wil Wheaton annepmitchell.substack.com

3,690 Followers  |  114 Following  |  3,986 Posts  |  Joined: 17.06.2023  |  1.9913

Latest posts by annepmitchell.bsky.social on Bluesky


Preview
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (@annepmitchell) I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT I HAVE TO SAY THIS AGAIN!! NO!! THE PRESIDENT CANNOT CANCEL ELECTIONS EVEN DURING TIMES OF WAR OR A NATIONAL EMERGENCY! HERE'S WHY FIRST! A bunch of pro-Trump lawyers (oh I'm so...

Keep reading if you want to (it's free): substack.com/profile/1791...

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Constitution gives to *Congress* the authority to choose on what date the presidential election will be held, and it must be the same day throughout the country. However it does *not* give Congress the authority to *cancel* elections.

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

For several reasons, including our Constitution, the president cannot suspend, let alone cancel, elections. EVER.

Learn a Little Law with Anne: Here are the facts:

The Constitution very specifically leaves *to the States* the setting and running of elections. Not the president.

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

He is very unlikely to call a national emergency over anything in that document. And he is *not* going to cancel elections! He can’t. A president has *no* authority to cancel or even postpone elections, even during times of war. Or some other national emergency, whether real or trumped up.

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

These are lawyers pandering to and trying to curry favour with Trump. (These are the f*cking lawyers that give the rest of us a bad name. I always say that 98% of the lawyers out there...give the other 2% of us a bad name.)

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT! This is *not* coming from the White House? Oh, I'm sure that Trump would love to consider it, but it *can't* happen. He probably even knows that.

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT I HAVE TO SAY THIS AGAIN!! NO!! THE PRESIDENT CANNOT CANCEL ELECTIONS

FIRST! A bunch of pro-Trump lawyers (oh I'm so ashamed to have them in the same profession!) drafted up a suggested executive order and are shopping it around.

27.02.2026 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In his narrative, Taylor explains that "Twelve names sit at the terminal end of this financial structure. These are the people the money reached β€” or in some cases, the people who fed money back into it."

26.02.2026 18:50 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And he shows his work and the files, as well as putting it all together in a narrative report on GitHub. I'm including the links to both his narrative and the underlying data. I fully expect this to go offline, so I have also saved all of the webpages in our private dropbox.

26.02.2026 18:50 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 26.02.2026 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We may even be approaching the "you won't have Trump to kick around anymore" moment.

26.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I am 100% certain that Trump was still working with Epstein through intermediaries (perhaps even Brende) at the time that Trump attended Davos in 2018, as this and other evidence I have seen with my own eyes will eventually prove.

26.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And also: "Brende, a former Norwegian foreign minister, dined with Epstein three times in 2018 and 2019." (source: Politico)

26.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

(Remember how Trump was so sure he was going to win the Nobel peace prize, which Norway, with all those government officials connected to Epstein, administers?)

26.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also Brende was Norway's Minister of Foreign Affairs (we've already seen a few resignations and a suicide attempt from highly placed Norwegian government officials over their connections to Epstein) up until 2017 which is when he took over as CEO of the World Economic Forum (Davos).

26.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT DOMINO

Why? Because Trump spoke at Davos in 2018, while he was in office.

26.02.2026 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 25.02.2026 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

These 15 individuals, making these massive illegitimate wire transfers, were (are?) suspected of funding both illegal drug transactions and prostitution.

Read full story: annepmitchell.substack.com/p/i-have-the...

24.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Operation Chain Reaction was looking into 15 individuals, Epstein being one of them, who were suspected of massive money laundering and illegitimate wire transfers.

24.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In fact, the Federal Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), of which the DEA is one of the agencies involved, was coordinating the investigation, dubbed Operation Chain Reaction, among multiple agencies.

24.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Or you may have heard it put in the context of something like "the DOJ didn't share this document" or such.

But the actual story is far deeper.

24.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I HAVE THE FULL DEA EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION DOCUMENT THAT THE NEWS OUTLETS ARE REPORTING ON - AND I HAVE QUESTIONS

By now you may have heard that the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) was investigating Epstein in 2015. In fact, if you read headlines, that’s pretty much all you may have heard.

24.02.2026 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
I Have the Full SUPERSEDING Indictment of Trump in the Jack Smith Case! And It's a Beaut! Now, this is the *indictment*, not the report known as "Volume II", but the fact that Jack Smith felt that there was enough to move forward with prosecuting the case says volumes (no pun intended) bec...

And that's what Trump stole and took with him when he left office.

Read full article (it's free):

annepmitchell.substack.com/p/i-have-the...

24.02.2026 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
I Have the Full SUPERSEDING Indictment of Trump in the Jack Smith Case! And It's a Beaut! Now, this is the *indictment*, not the report known as "Volume II", but the fact that Jack Smith felt that there was enough to move forward with prosecuting the case says volumes (no pun intended) bec...

*WHAT* was and is going on behind the scenes among the Epsteinerati? The trading of and using of as leverage *state secrets*! That's what Andrew has been arrested for, that's what Mandelson has been arrested for.

24.02.2026 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
I Have the Full SUPERSEDING Indictment of Trump in the Jack Smith Case! And It's a Beaut! Now, this is the *indictment*, not the report known as "Volume II", but the fact that Jack Smith felt that there was enough to move forward with prosecuting the case says volumes (no pun intended) bec...

And WHAT did Jack Smith find during his research and investigation into it all, which he put in Volume II, and which Trump *absolutely* does *not* want to be made public? After all, the public *already* knows what was in the indictments.

That's when it hit me:

24.02.2026 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

I HAVE THE FULL *SUPERSEDING* INDICTMENT OF TRUMP IN THE JACK SMITH CASE! AND SOMETHING JUST HIT ME

*WHY* did Trump want to possess these documents? And WHY did he go to such extraordinary lengths to hide them?

24.02.2026 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
About the Jack Smith Report Being Cannon Fodder - All is Not Lost! The Cavalry has Already Assembled and Filed! Earlier today Judge Aileen Cannon issued an order prohibiting the release of Volume II of Jack Smith's report on the case involving Trump’s illegally taking classified documents with him when he left ...

2. Given 1, it's really zero surprise that Trump's motion to not have Volume II released was *unopposed*.

Read article: annepmitchell.substack.com/p/about-the-...

24.02.2026 02:19 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Now, there are a few things you should note:

1. The absurdity of "United States v. Donald Trump" because, well, the DOJ is representing the 'United States', so it's *really* "Donald Trump's DOJ versus Donald Trump".

24.02.2026 02:19 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

ABOUT THE JACK SMITH REPORT BEING CANNON FODDER - ALL IS NOT LOST! THE CAVALRY HAS ALREADY ASSEMBLED AND FILED!

Today Judge Cannon issued an order prohibiting the release of Volume II of Jack Smith's report on the case involving Trump’s illegally taking classified documents when he left office.

24.02.2026 02:19 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

NOTES FROM THE FRONT CITIZEN SLEUTHS MAKING THE BIG TIME!

apnews.com/article/epst...

23.02.2026 23:52 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@annepmitchell is following 19 prominent accounts