Thatβs nothing: Topological qubits have only reached the same point that the Catholic church did 2000 years ago. (Made up stories and claims of miracles).
03.02.2026 14:01 β π 10 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0@henrylegg.bsky.social
Lecturer (~asst prof) investigating quantum physics @univofstandrews. My opinions belong to 28 highly trained monkeys and are not those of my employer. Webpage: https://legg.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/
Thatβs nothing: Topological qubits have only reached the same point that the Catholic church did 2000 years ago. (Made up stories and claims of miracles).
03.02.2026 14:01 β π 10 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Supposedly the most for any physicist, although the nominations are kept secret for quite a long period of time.
26.01.2026 23:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Fun fact I learnt preparing my condensed matter lectures for this semester:
Arnold Sommerfeld was nominated 84 times for the Nobel prize in physics, but never won.
Interestingly, despite his lifelong Nobel prize disappointment, Sommerfeld never threatened to invade Greenland (as far as I know).
Ignoring the other madness in this: Itβs interesting to see how French food is used as a weapon of diplomacy.
Whatβs the British equivalent of dinner in Paris? Fish and chips with the king?
Oh man these Microsoft Quantum press releases are getting weirder (parody)
19.01.2026 17:00 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I have long thought the hyper focus on the Nobel prize by many βbigshotβ scientists is bad for scienceβ¦
I had never considered that the hyper focus of a US president on the Nobel peace prize could be bad for peace
I am making the supreme sacrifice in the name of solidarity. For as long as Trump is threatening Greenland I will boycott American bread and chocolate.
18.01.2026 18:59 β π 144 π 14 π¬ 28 π 4The rarest of sights - a big glossy journal publishing negative replications! Yes, we had to bundle 4 replications into one article AND we had to wait 2 (!!) years in peer review, but here we are:
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Fair point. The orcs of third age probably mostly drove Skodas.
30.10.2025 18:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The parsimonious position is neither that Orcs did or did not drive Ferraris to work as part of Sauron's compensation package to them, but that some orcs may have sometimes driven Ferraris to work.
30.10.2025 17:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thank you for all your private messages to me about Balrog wings.
Unfortunately, in 2025, wingers like @dangaristo.bsky.social still exist and think Balrogs were just glorified penguins.
In this era of fake news we must defend important facts: Balrogs do not have wings.
Now this is classic Usenet beef. We're talking 30-year-aged stuff here. Simpler times. Better times.
29.10.2025 19:21 β π 8 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0Dan there are two universal truths:
1) Balrogs do not have wings.
2) Feanor did nothing wrong.
Yes, the wings are a metaphor for the shadow. Literally following on from a simile βshadowβ¦ like two wingsβ. Why would it have shadow *like*wings if it already had wings?!?
I canβt believe I have to explain similes and metaphors to a journalist.
@dangaristo.bsky.social this is how Balrog wingers imagine Durin's bane.
You think a glorified penguin is going to go toe-to-toe with Gandalf? Come off it.
Dan, do not let me question your judgment: If you believe that Balrogs had wings you are very very wrong.
You probably also think that Feanor did something wrong. Feanor did nothing wrong. Period.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXKn...
I was just sent a video of a child in a Balrog halloween costume. Appallingly, the Balrog costume had wings.
**Balrogs do not have wings**
Why are we teaching children incorrect anatomy of mythical creatures? Are you going to also throw a pair of wings on a giraffe?
My day is already ruined.
Let's be very clear: Googleβs claims are debatable, Microsoftβs are a work of fiction.
Be sceptical of Google like the bloke down the pub claiming he lives in a mansion.
Be sceptical of Microsoft like the bloke claiming he lives in a castle in the sky powered by topoconductors and fairy dust.
Today my @nytimes.com colleagues and I are launching a new series called Lost Science. We interview US scientists who can no longer discover something new about our world, thanks to this yearβs cuts. Here is my first interview with a scientist who studied bees and fires. Gift link: nyti.ms/3IWXbiE
08.10.2025 23:29 β π 4731 π 1828 π¬ 142 π 83There are some differences between UK and international BBC.
Still there on their science page, now with a seemingly AI generated picture: www.bbc.co.uk/news/science...
NO BBC! Don't summon them, don't do it!
07.10.2025 11:06 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1The correct decision from the Nobel committee. If they had even muttered the words "quantum computing" the number of start-up founders posting about their quantum crypto coin NFTs would break LinkedIn.
07.10.2025 10:23 β π 24 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0Our Nobel Prize predictions for the next week. #Nobel2025
05.10.2025 17:15 β π 26 π 7 π¬ 0 π 2It has come to the authors' attention that the unit of 'hour' was not defined in the original manuscript. Within the context of our experiment, 'hour' was used to denote 30 days. The authors confirm that all results within the manuscript are valid and entirely consistent with this definition.
04.10.2025 09:40 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Sergey your joke doesnβt work: If they were travelling close to the speed of light then they would have had even less than 22 hours to make the decision (as appears here on Earth).
Please issue an immediate retraction of the joke.
Bit grim seeing the FT treat HSBCβs quantum computing theatre as actual news. Why worry about fake news when the establishment press has already been lobotomised by corporate press releases?
I wish HSBC (my mortgage provider) were as flexible with my interest rate as they are with realityβ¦
Meme about noise from quantum industry vs me.
29.09.2025 22:08 β π 23 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Bullshit
www.hsbc.com/news-and-vie...