RCB.snarks's Avatar

RCB.snarks

@rcbsnarks.bsky.social

268 Followers  |  362 Following  |  89 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  2.1265

Latest posts by rcbsnarks.bsky.social on Bluesky

Actually, lawyer and client should come up with all the options together and then the lawyer can help define the risks with each option. A good lawyer will not just articulate the legal risks, but also maybe reputational and moral risks. And, the best lawyers will help you take smart risks.

06.02.2026 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@chrismurphyct.bsky.social Enough with the rhetoric. ACT. I’m with @elienyc.bsky.social SHUT IT DOWN.

30.01.2026 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🀬

29.01.2026 23:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’―

28.01.2026 16:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No outrage by Democratic leadership either! SMDH.

28.01.2026 06:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Chicagoland.

25.01.2026 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 32    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And all the democrats who worked behind the scenes to facilitate its passing. They are there too.

24.01.2026 18:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

With that intro I was expecting something disturbing and this is … not.

18.12.2025 20:21 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wtaf

04.12.2025 00:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’€

16.11.2025 20:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Probably before then if we’re being honest. Sigh.

10.11.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wtaf.

10.11.2025 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Of course. But equally it should not be assumed that all were in favor of this β€œdeal.” That was my point.

10.11.2025 14:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Too bad @durbin.senate.gov doesn’t answer his phones or open up his voicemail. It’s almost like he doesn’t want to hear from his constituents. 🀨

10.11.2025 13:20 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

@durbin.senate.gov what say you? πŸ‘†πŸΌ

10.11.2025 13:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Same with Durbin. Almost seems like they don’t want to hear from their constituents. 🀨

10.11.2025 12:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But Warner voted no. It’s because Warner is up for reelection in 2026 while Kaine not until 2030.

10.11.2025 12:10 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’―

10.11.2025 03:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They all sold us out. That is my working assumption until they take action to remove leadership.

10.11.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Agree. The No votes better take action.

10.11.2025 02:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Liars. Protecting the filibuster because eventually that’s what Republicans would have had to do to break the stalemate. Weaksauce - all of them.

10.11.2025 02:52 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’―

10.11.2025 02:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My household is directly impacted. Agree with you wholeheartedly. To make the sacrifice for … nothing … is infuriating and insulting.

10.11.2025 02:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They all sold us out. They just figured out who could take the fall easiest.

10.11.2025 02:27 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Don’t believe it unless you take action to oust Schumer. Otherwise, just looks like the caucus worked together to pick the least vulnerable Dems at the next election cycle to give you all cover. Enough with the empty rhetoric.

10.11.2025 02:25 β€” πŸ‘ 76    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

Don’t believe it unless you take action to oust Schumer. Otherwise, just looks like the caucus worked together to pick the least vulnerable Dems at the next election cycle to give you all cover. Enough with the empty rhetoric.

10.11.2025 02:25 β€” πŸ‘ 76    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

πŸ’―

10.11.2025 02:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’― He looked like he was being propped up at the No Kings rally. My household is *directly* impacted by the shutdown and I am furious at his vote. And the fact that as a constituent I can’t get through on any of his phone lines (per usual with him) is despicable.

10.11.2025 01:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’―

10.11.2025 01:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Resign.

10.11.2025 01:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@rcbsnarks is following 20 prominent accounts