Once & Future Ebike Owner, Kevin Elliott's Avatar

Once & Future Ebike Owner, Kevin Elliott

@kjephd.bsky.social

Political theorist studying democracy, ethics, & institutions. Author of Democracy for Busy People (https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo194847654.html); more at kevinjelliott.net. Generally poasting my way through this thing

30,535 Followers  |  1,157 Following  |  23,588 Posts  |  Joined: 13.09.2023  |  2.4135

Latest posts by kjephd.bsky.social on Bluesky


My congresswoman is pictured

*SIGH*

01.03.2026 00:01 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yet even many of the post-Bush generation of Dems have imbibed this nonsense

28.02.2026 23:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Democrats are still in the defensive crouch George W Bush's aggressive domestic warmongering put them into after 9/11. They don't believe you can politically survive opposition to any aggressive foreign policy.

(This seems like zombie common sense, to me)

28.02.2026 23:57 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

A data point to remember re: β€œpopularism” is that the popular position on what is happening in Iran and happened in Venezuela is β€œno war, this is insane, full stop” and the moderate elected officials we are supposed to like are saying contorted, legalistic, unpopular word salad instead of that.

28.02.2026 18:06 β€” πŸ‘ 406    πŸ” 113    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 6
Post

See new posts
Conversation
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Β·
2h
From US admin official background briefing recording listening to, seriously question if US negotiators understood what Iranians were proposing. One official keeps saying acronym for β€œIAEA” wrong.
They seem astonished Iran would not agree to the US supplying them nuclear fuel
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Β·
2h
They took as suspicious proposals that Iran saw as concessionary.
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Β·
2h
Explains why Oman FM tried to come to DC to explain what US negotiators may not have fully understood
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Am not saying what Iran proposed would have been enough, I dont know, but it seems US negotiators did not have the expert guidance to understand it correctly

Post See new posts Conversation Laura Rozen @lrozen Β· 2h From US admin official background briefing recording listening to, seriously question if US negotiators understood what Iranians were proposing. One official keeps saying acronym for β€œIAEA” wrong. They seem astonished Iran would not agree to the US supplying them nuclear fuel Laura Rozen @lrozen Β· 2h They took as suspicious proposals that Iran saw as concessionary. Laura Rozen @lrozen Β· 2h Explains why Oman FM tried to come to DC to explain what US negotiators may not have fully understood Laura Rozen @lrozen Am not saying what Iran proposed would have been enough, I dont know, but it seems US negotiators did not have the expert guidance to understand it correctly

On top of all the reporting that this war of aggression was planned well in advance, it seems that the reporting also indicates that the US political leadership are quite literally too stupid to understand basic diplomacy. I mean literally not smart enough.

28.02.2026 23:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2218    πŸ” 785    πŸ’¬ 58    πŸ“Œ 90

Honestly, TMZ seems to be the right publication in terms of seriousness to cover & break news from this clownish regime

28.02.2026 22:35 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

On the one hand, the presidency is a fundamentally broken institution.

On the other hand, Congress is a fundamentally broken institution.

On the third hand, the Supreme Court is a fundamentally broken institution.

28.02.2026 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1691    πŸ” 365    πŸ’¬ 40    πŸ“Œ 17

Holy race to the bottom, Batman

28.02.2026 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Omg, yes

28.02.2026 19:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If we were behind the veil of ignorance and someone offered us the de facto Constitution, we would kick him until he wasn’t ignorant anymore.

28.02.2026 19:29 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Undermining the conventions and practices underlying a peaceful international order on a retail basis

28.02.2026 14:38 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

On attacking Iran:
My guess is that the US and ISR top aims are pure decapitation. ISR may have a plan for What Comes Next, but I doubt the US does.

28.02.2026 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 184    πŸ” 38    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 8

It’s crazy that it’s basically just a combination of the single worst most disastrous parts of every administration in history

28.02.2026 12:55 β€” πŸ‘ 4783    πŸ” 666    πŸ’¬ 51    πŸ“Œ 25

Holy race to the bottom, Batman

28.02.2026 14:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Opinion | Trump’s Strikes on Iran Were Unlawful. Here’s Why That Matters.

The strikes on Iran are blatantly illegal. I explained in June why the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were unlawful under US and international law. Everything I wrote then is true today, but this is a far larger assault with far graver consequences.

www.nytimes.com/2025/06/23/o...

28.02.2026 12:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1704    πŸ” 559    πŸ’¬ 40    πŸ“Œ 22

The media simply refused to describe the actual, real world stakes of the 2024 election. The Republican nominee was a demonstrable violent lunatic hell bent on revenge and that man was covered like a normal guy who would tame inflation.

28.02.2026 14:18 β€” πŸ‘ 431    πŸ” 123    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 5
Post image

FWIW, this is sec. 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution:

28.02.2026 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 342    πŸ” 148    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 12
Post image

In the past, sometimes presidents have said it’s just a military operation or limited airstrikes to skirt Congress. Trump has unilaterally launched major combat operations, declaring war with the goal of regime change. A major violation of the U.S. Constitution, also illegal under international law

28.02.2026 08:46 β€” πŸ‘ 5913    πŸ” 2002    πŸ’¬ 222    πŸ“Œ 155

In case you’re just waking up, the U.S. has teamed up with Israel overnight to start an illegal war of regime change, apparently on a presidential whim with no involvement of Congress, and they are already committing horrific atrocities.

28.02.2026 12:14 β€” πŸ‘ 6320    πŸ” 2703    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 74

They don't understand that regular people won't just swallow and regurgitate any old random propaganda the way people on the right will. They thought slapping a CBS sticker on right wing nuttery would work but it's not.

This worked on "conservatives," but will backfire in this context.

28.02.2026 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Y'know that political thing that everyone hates? Let's try to sell that"

28.02.2026 06:19 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

the other thing about opposing Putin in Ukraine is that Putin keeps directly intervening in american elections. like, if you want to defeat fascism at home, preventing putin from expanding his power is a pretty good investment.

28.02.2026 06:17 β€” πŸ‘ 92    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You may worry the patterns of self-selection they document are out of date given the age of these books in this fast-growing literature but I can assure you nothing much has changed regarding the 'denominator' problem: even when they stratify invitations & include payment, only single digits say yes

27.02.2026 19:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks! If you're planning to dig into this literature, I'd recommend Fournier et al's When Citizens Decide and Warren & Pearce's edited volume Designing Deliberative Democracy (esp Ch.5 by James on descriptive representation), if you're concerned about elitism-in-practice.

27.02.2026 19:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
The basic argument is as follows. Though mini-publics seem to be able to  cultivate  stand-by  citizenship  for  those  who  participate  in  them,  they  cannot  do  so  for  the  mass  public  through  their  deployment  at  the  na-tional or state level. To do so at mass scale, they would have to be multi-plied enormously for citizens to have a decent chance of being selected. Multiplying  the  number  of  mini-publics,  though,  would  require  a  more  thorough  renovation  of  democratic  institutions  than  most  imagine;  do-ing  so  would  require  going  far  beyond  the  most  successful  examples  to  date.  Most  importantly,  multiplying  mini-publics  would  almost  certainlyinvolve  displacing  elections  and  political  parties  as  the  cardinal  institu-tions of democracy. Yet this would hobble the institutions that currently do  the  most  to  reach  citizens  where  they  are  and  make  politics  cogni-tively tractable. These tasks are, as we have seen, the core needs of a de-mocracy for busy people. I conclude then that mini-publics are not likely to  be  a

The basic argument is as follows. Though mini-publics seem to be able to cultivate stand-by citizenship for those who participate in them, they cannot do so for the mass public through their deployment at the na-tional or state level. To do so at mass scale, they would have to be multi-plied enormously for citizens to have a decent chance of being selected. Multiplying the number of mini-publics, though, would require a more thorough renovation of democratic institutions than most imagine; do-ing so would require going far beyond the most successful examples to date. Most importantly, multiplying mini-publics would almost certainlyinvolve displacing elections and political parties as the cardinal institu-tions of democracy. Yet this would hobble the institutions that currently do the most to reach citizens where they are and make politics cogni-tively tractable. These tasks are, as we have seen, the core needs of a de-mocracy for busy people. I conclude then that mini-publics are not likely to be a

Oh, yes, I'm very familiar with Fishkin's work and I cite him.

Very valuable for dispelling naive concerns about deliberation. My worries are a bit complex and discussed in chapter 7 of my book:

27.02.2026 19:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I remember when ppl told me that moderate Dems would never even consider inflicting real consequences on MAGA Regime loyalists.

27.02.2026 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 49    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, if you're a starβ€”er, very special boy presidentβ€”they let you do it

27.02.2026 19:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

(I was SO THRILLED to write that section; it was probably the main reason I agreed to write it)

27.02.2026 19:05 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dark

27.02.2026 17:46 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The conspiracy theory was that we'd be forced to eat bugs

27.02.2026 17:34 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

@kjephd is following 20 prominent accounts