dev

I don't recall the DSA ever officially endorsing Fetterman and can't find any mention of it

I'm very confused how donating to the DSA will allow more Fettermans. Then linking to a Jacobin article makes it even more confusing.

huh?

get ready to be primaried lmaoooo nice post loser

don't worry, Schumer and Jeffries will find a way to

The BIG BUCKAROO don't MISS

Debate me in the marketplace of ideas (the cereal aisle at Walmart)

damn we just gotta vote harder next time huh

intersectionality is too complicated of an idea for him even with your admittedly good analogy

do you not tip your landlord either

You deserve it, top buckaroo. Thank you for continuing to prove that despite it all, Love is Real.

lmao he fucking deleted it, what a clown

The typical "optics over action" playbook

oh I wasn't saying it was big pharma. focus was on the fact that it could be done with a stroke of a pen and it still hasn't been done. Should have been clearer, but ty for the information for others though. I was on a plane very sleepy posting

I want to be absolutely clear I'm not doing the annoying cringe lib "thing" of comparing bad people to villains. The difference here is that I wonder if he THINKS he is the God-Emperor or some lame shit.

What really concerns me is if we follow this thread to its logical conclusion, who is Horus?

I unironically believe that Elon is trying to pull a God Emperor / Primarch thing from WH40K:

1. Has 12 kids
2. One of them is named "Techno Mechanicus"
3. Rarely interacts with them, absent father

We know he's a fake gamer already, so it's not outside the realm of possibility.

it is a confluence of issues and I do agree with you that something else is afoot. what that may be is something to be uncovered, but if I were a betting man is that corporate interests profit from fascism through way of nationalistic deregulation, driving corruption through lobbying, etc.

yet marijuana is still not legal federally. it's almost as if the Democratic party can't keep campaign promises even when they hold a majority and that fatigued voters. you can continue scolding that voting block though, that's working great so far yeah?

damn I'm sorry that trying to address why the Democratic party is so out of touch that it alienated an entire voting block is exhausting

tapping the sign again

is this like The Secret but for bad journalism? are they trying to will something into existence

Material conditions don't improve. Arguing online about this only influences people like you and me, not the majority of those who abstained (is my assumption, I have no clue where I'd even begin to find valid data on that tbh) Just my 2c rambling here 3/3

To shift their policy demands left, but that audience only exists on social media. Grab a random selection of voting aged people off the street and I'd bet their reason for voting isn't "nerdy leftist obsessed with theory told me not to vote" but that they feel like no matter who they vote for, 2/

I always wonder about this take. I think that we severely overestimate the impact that social media discourse has. I think it is an echo chamber and us saying "hey, the Democratic party isn't really led by competent people right now" is more trying to influence the center/center-right Democrats 1/

we're so gonna make it

Not surprised that Tim Pool's grammar is bad. So much for the "enlightened right" /s

I very much agree with Killjoy here and understand your point. But in my opinion, at least in the 30 some odd years I've been alive, the boot never came off the neck, even when we were told it was supposed to.