JulietteOnTheMoon (she/her) 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈

Quentin Letts has plenty of form as a C list asshole hack - been doing this kind of bullshit-to-a-deadline for years.

Build council homes.

Treat people with dignity.

The threat isn't the migrants - it's the wealth of the super rich.

And the media outlets and the politicians who protect their power.

Loving the show :-)
Saw you in Tunbridge Wells the other week - fab

Keir Starmer. The one-term Labour Prime Minister who believed in nothing and so protected no-one. Nesrine Malik in The Guardian today is right [ The Democrats are in deep trouble in the US – and Labour is on the way to joining them]  Star...

kierkegaardslunch.blogspot.com/2025/08/keir...

Keir Starmer. The one-term Labour Prime Minister who believed in nothing and so protected no-one. Nesrine Malik in The Guardian today is right [ The Democrats are in deep trouble in the US – and Labour is on the way to joining them]  Star...

kierkegaardslunch.blogspot.com/2025/08/keir...

It's his brutal instinct. He's absolutely obsessed with being The Hard man. And his entire political mission, since the earliest parts of his leadership campaign has been to destroy the left. It's not even a secret.

proof that #starmer is an utter and dangerous fool...

Exactly how i feel.

@bphillipsonmp.bsky.social and @commonswec.parliament.uk this is how the community feels, the voices you should listen to. Not some pandering hate group.

Does this seem like we feel the 'dignity and respect' we hear so much about, but all we ever see is hate! @ukparliament.parliament.uk

Starmer isn't listening. Is he about to throw the UK trans community under Trump's bus? Back at the beginning of February this year I wrote on this blog that I could foresee Keir Starmer, throwing the British trans community un...

kierkegaardslunch.blogspot.com/2025/06/star...

#neilyoung omfg how good is this set! This guy is 79 ! He just burned Glastonbury with Rockin’ in the Free World. 💥🔋🔥🔥

#bobvylan @glastonbury.bsky.social -absolutely fucking epic set. Crowd surfing all the way to the edge of the mic range. All the more epic after the BBC has given in to pressure to not broadcast Kneecap straight after.

Have it to read next. Saw her on South Bank reading from it 2 weeks ago. Great night. She reflected on her passport running out next year. Defiance, anger & determination. Queue for book signing was so long I *literally* left, had a sit-down pizza/dessert, returned & was the final one in the line!

🧵3. I was so touched. And I fought for the advancement of women in that company. The #2 in my team was a woman & I pushed hard for her to be made a Board Director too, with her own team. She did it. Her talent & ability were obvs key but I like to think I played a part. She went on to become MD.

🧵2. A few years ago I joined a company as a Board member. I was the 1st woman they'd put on the Board. One of my most powerful memories is a few weeks in. A female mid-level manager (who knew - as they all did - that I am trans) said to me, "I'm so happy to see a woman finally on the Board here"...

Court ruling on legal definition of a woman ‘misinterpreted’, Lady Hale says Speaking at book festival in east Sussex, former supreme court president says reaction to judgment ‘very binary’

🧵1. www.theguardian.com/law/2025/may...
'(Julia Hoggett, Lady Hale's daughter and CEO of London Stock Exchange) said she would love to have “a talented trans woman sitting on a board of mine”'. And that really lands for me because of a story in my own life...

In 2024 the Tories were voted out - and replaced by The Tories.

The new Tories had used an election slogan. Rejecting anything that could have meaning or lead to any accountability they went with: ‘Change is possible’.

What they didn’t say was they meant change for the even worse.

As per previous post. Is Starmer actually some kind of Tory ‘asset’?

Is Starmer actually some kind of Tory ‘asset’?

Only one key watch out. It's written by two Times journalists.

I've read it. It's chilling. Starmer presented a principle-less, robotic, character-free bot. The aim was the total destruction of the left & they did it. Not once in the entire book is there any mention of aims or values - just power. Also one line in it reveals McSweeney to be a long standing GC.

Fuck Keir Starmer

I was wondering about that. I presume so, soon.

This morning I used the women’s loo at a big London railway station - just as I have when I needed to for 17 years.

I used the toilet, washed my hands, checked my hair and left.

Past the male cleaner who had been working away in there the whole time.

No-one cared.

No-one.

Thread -please read all of it

1/8 An extraordinary day in London. Many thousands. The police seemed blindsided by the way we completely filled Parliament Sq & later the surrounding streets and then St James’ Park.

And wow did we need it.

But…

It sounds interesting - though consulting my legal buddy there is actually no law in the UK against anyone - male or female - going topless.

That said the effect of trans women doing this would still make a major point.

The UK Supreme Court destroys 20 years of legal rights for trans people in 20 minutes... . In Britain, run by a Labour government populated by duplicitous snakes, the mood music may differ, but we're about to be looking at a leve...

All I can do is write about it all...
kierkegaardslunch.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-...

The UK Supreme Court destroys 20 years of legal rights for trans people in 20 minutes... . In Britain, run by a Labour government populated by duplicitous snakes, the mood music may differ, but we're about to be looking at a leve...

All I can do is write about it all...
kierkegaardslunch.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-...

The ruling is legally incoherent. Truly garbage. Tbh nobody really nows wtf it actually means

But as @stephenwhittleton.bsky.social says maybe the most present threat is that employers and/or service providers will comply in advance. This is EXACTLY what the next stage will be - to make that happen

The Supreme Court ignored trans voices. I’m ashamed of what our law has become | Good Law Project The Supreme Court’s decision to exclude trans voices has harmed trans people – and harmed the fairness of their ruling.

I've put on my hob nailed boots and given the Supreme Court decision the kicking it deserves. goodlaw.social/vd3a