MAT-AT (aka Downtown Lars)'s Avatar

MAT-AT (aka Downtown Lars)

@08mms.bsky.social

M&A Lawyer, Semi-Stereotypical Dad, Michigan Wolverine, National History Day - Michigan Regional Runner Up (2000)

601 Followers  |  1,079 Following  |  2,914 Posts  |  Joined: 01.07.2023  |  3.0209

Latest posts by 08mms.bsky.social on Bluesky

Does anyone have the link for this article? This is wild.

13.08.2025 20:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Quote from a story on changes at the U of Chicago that notes they are "pausing" doctoral eduction in Classics, Comp Lit, Germanic studies, Middle Eastern Studies, Romance languages and literatures, and South Asian Studies.

Quote from a story on changes at the U of Chicago that notes they are "pausing" doctoral eduction in Classics, Comp Lit, Germanic studies, Middle Eastern Studies, Romance languages and literatures, and South Asian Studies.

Wow. The University of Chicago, a world-class institution whose humanities faculty in the past has included Homi Bhabha & Lauren Berlant & Ralph Ellison & Hannah freaking Arendt, is getting rid of basically every graduate department involving the acknowledgment that other cultures & languages exist.

13.08.2025 19:29 β€” πŸ‘ 168    πŸ” 83    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 17

Yeah, we need to find the next Tom Brady and then have him alternate years where he only hands off the ball or has a porous line that gets him blown up like a Bears QB.

13.08.2025 19:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We haven’t ruined a generation QB yet, they should really get on that after Goff retires.

13.08.2025 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Use to get box lunches there all the time after school before going to sports or piano practice, maybe just a Michigan thing but they were lovely (and they had decent chicken salad).

13.08.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My dad’s family are a giant group of people who never really learned to cook, so getting a ham has always been the default for any event where more than a couple people show up (such that a regular conversation for meeting at the extended family lake house is defending who is getting the ham).

13.08.2025 19:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Slightly diminish a band…

Something Limited Liability Company

13.08.2025 03:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
13.08.2025 03:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1457    πŸ” 160    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 21
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Case 5:24-cv-00625-JSM-PRL Document 100
Q Exhibit 30 --
A She was upset. She was jealous.
Exhibit 30 is your response to her; can you
read that out loud to me?
"Hey, Marjorie. Remember when you destroyed
your family so you could have sex with a Zangief cosplayer? Tell me again how you and the Arby's in
2000
0337
your pants" -- yeah. That was widely reported. I
2
3
mean, that's why she got divorced. And that divorce records --
Q No. No. Read the tweet.
A "Are representatives of the GOP. You couldn't even run your own family. Don't tell me how to run my free speech."
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
0338
Okay. So when you --
A But you're not showing the -- the screenshot. It's like intentionally blurred out. I don't know why you blurred it out. But it showed a document where somebody who she had an affair with showed text messages of her having an affair, and it was well-documented. It was in text messages.
And it's the reason why she ended up getting divorced from her husband, Perry, who I know. 'Cause when -- at the time, during my campaign, they were married, and they came to my event. And it's well-known. And she's even admitted to it that they got divorced because of her marital infidelity. So --
β€’ Right. Can you explain to me what it
means --
Filed 07/31/25
Page 152 of 228 PagelD
A But I don't understand why you blurred it
out. It's blurred out.
3
4
Q Can you explain --
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Can you explain to me what it means to say
7
to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A Well, Arby's --
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
0339
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A Arby's sells roast beef.
Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were
talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q
What is the expression trying to convey?
It conveys the reason why she got a divorce
by her own admission.
Q
Because she had roast beef in her pants?
…

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case 5:24-cv-00625-JSM-PRL Document 100 Q Exhibit 30 -- A She was upset. She was jealous. Exhibit 30 is your response to her; can you read that out loud to me? "Hey, Marjorie. Remember when you destroyed your family so you could have sex with a Zangief cosplayer? Tell me again how you and the Arby's in 2000 0337 your pants" -- yeah. That was widely reported. I 2 3 mean, that's why she got divorced. And that divorce records -- Q No. No. Read the tweet. A "Are representatives of the GOP. You couldn't even run your own family. Don't tell me how to run my free speech." 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0338 Okay. So when you -- A But you're not showing the -- the screenshot. It's like intentionally blurred out. I don't know why you blurred it out. But it showed a document where somebody who she had an affair with showed text messages of her having an affair, and it was well-documented. It was in text messages. And it's the reason why she ended up getting divorced from her husband, Perry, who I know. 'Cause when -- at the time, during my campaign, they were married, and they came to my event. And it's well-known. And she's even admitted to it that they got divorced because of her marital infidelity. So -- β€’ Right. Can you explain to me what it means -- Filed 07/31/25 Page 152 of 228 PagelD A But I don't understand why you blurred it out. It's blurred out. 3 4 Q Can you explain -- MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. BY MS. BOLGER: Q Can you explain to me what it means to say 7 to her that "the Arby's in her pants"? A Well, Arby's -- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 0339 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. BY MS. BOLGER: Q Answer the question. A Arby's sells roast beef. Q Right. Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"? Well, it's just a -- an expression. Q What is the expression trying to convey? It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission. Q Because she had roast beef in her pants? …

1|
case 5.24-Cv-Os inGeM-PRL Document 2001
saying she put Arby's in her pants?
2
A I'm saying she literally -- it's so
3
ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in
4
her pants. Yes.
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q You're not making a slur about her?
8
A No.
9
You're literally saying she put an Arby's
101
sandwich in her pants; is that right?
11
A
Yes. That's correct. That's correct.
12
Why are you laughing?
13
Because I just think it's so funny.
14
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's
15
in her pants?
16
A I just think it's so funny. I just think
17
it's so funny.
18
Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's
19
in her pants?
20
A She carries roast beef in her pockets.
21
What is your basis for saying she puts roast
22 beef in her pockets and in her pants?
0340
1
2
MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy.
Harassment.
3
THE WITNESS: Because I know she likes
4
roast beef.
5
BY MS. BOLGER:
6
Q So what is your basis for saying she had
7
Arby's in her pants?
8
A Because I know she likes to eat at Arby's.
9
Q And she likes to put it in her pants; you
10
know that?
11
Yeah.
12
She puts Arby's in her pants?
13
Yeah. She does.
14
Q
15
Okay. If I ask Marjorie Taylor Greene, she
would tell you that she puts Arby's in her pants?
16
A I -- it's my best belief that she would tell
17 you that. Yes.
18
Q Okay. Are you making a derogatory comment
19
about her sex life by talking about Arby's in her
20
pants?
21
22
A No. I'm talking about Arby's, the
sandwiches. I'm talking about Arby's. I would -- I'm
0341
3
8
a very direct person. If I was making a derogatory
comment, I would have said it.
I just think it's so funny because I -- I feel like you would understand it if you actually hadn't blurred the photo, but it's blurred.
Q We didn't blur a photo. There may be have been some kind of copy editor, but we'll get you a better copy of it, if that's right.
Filed 07/31/25 Page 153 of 228 PagelD

1| case 5.24-Cv-Os inGeM-PRL Document 2001 saying she put Arby's in her pants? 2 A I'm saying she literally -- it's so 3 ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in 4 her pants. Yes. MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. BY MS. BOLGER: Q You're not making a slur about her? 8 A No. 9 You're literally saying she put an Arby's 101 sandwich in her pants; is that right? 11 A Yes. That's correct. That's correct. 12 Why are you laughing? 13 Because I just think it's so funny. 14 Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's 15 in her pants? 16 A I just think it's so funny. I just think 17 it's so funny. 18 Q What is your basis for saying she put Arby's 19 in her pants? 20 A She carries roast beef in her pockets. 21 What is your basis for saying she puts roast 22 beef in her pockets and in her pants? 0340 1 2 MR. KLAYMAN: Objection. Relevancy. Harassment. 3 THE WITNESS: Because I know she likes 4 roast beef. 5 BY MS. BOLGER: 6 Q So what is your basis for saying she had 7 Arby's in her pants? 8 A Because I know she likes to eat at Arby's. 9 Q And she likes to put it in her pants; you 10 know that? 11 Yeah. 12 She puts Arby's in her pants? 13 Yeah. She does. 14 Q 15 Okay. If I ask Marjorie Taylor Greene, she would tell you that she puts Arby's in her pants? 16 A I -- it's my best belief that she would tell 17 you that. Yes. 18 Q Okay. Are you making a derogatory comment 19 about her sex life by talking about Arby's in her 20 pants? 21 22 A No. I'm talking about Arby's, the sandwiches. I'm talking about Arby's. I would -- I'm 0341 3 8 a very direct person. If I was making a derogatory comment, I would have said it. I just think it's so funny because I -- I feel like you would understand it if you actually hadn't blurred the photo, but it's blurred. Q We didn't blur a photo. There may be have been some kind of copy editor, but we'll get you a better copy of it, if that's right. Filed 07/31/25 Page 153 of 228 PagelD

β€œWhat is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?”

I don’t even know where to begin.

You just have to read these two pages.

12.08.2025 23:59 β€” πŸ‘ 3276    πŸ” 545    πŸ’¬ 240    πŸ“Œ 332

I’m not sure if he was technically a QB, more like a trebuchet

12.08.2025 22:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Where they’ve shown the least restraint is pushing forward the positions near and dear to the segment of right-wing Catholicism that is a core part of the legal wing a number of the justices came from, so feel like gay marriage in particular is the spot they are least likely to moderate

12.08.2025 21:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I really want to know what these salt and pepper shakers are now.

12.08.2025 17:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Whoa…..

12.08.2025 17:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Even magic genies or disguised mythic gods would screw around with that, people need basic skills in talking to non-human things that appear to talk back.

11.08.2025 19:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh no, I don’t like that, especially given how messed up Bogart’s romantic life was.

11.08.2025 19:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyone knows Faine is a semi-mythical spirit creature that lives in the fabric of Bluesky that punishes and/or rewards poasters with terrifying .jpegs.

11.08.2025 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I loved it as a kid but haven’t played in decades, does it hold up as fun for grown ups?

10.08.2025 14:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m not sure if the politics actually made the prequels bad though, because they added really interesting depth to go along with his talent for fun space/lightsaber battles. I think the real problem is he was too important at that point for a real editor like he had in the first movies.

10.08.2025 11:25 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

God, I’d represent the AI pro-bono

10.08.2025 03:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Secret Escher

08.08.2025 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hopefully it’s just him in one of the labs injecting himself with every drug he can get his hands on to see what happens.

08.08.2025 20:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This feels like a cursed artifact from
one of her books.

08.08.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

there are small ways within individual sports to manage in the very rare case it matters (like boxing/wrestling has class designations even within gender) and that’s why this is a matter for situational resolution and not a publicly policy debate masking as folks trying to β€œsolve” that aspect

07.08.2025 15:09 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I wish there was a better way to hit the managing of marginal competitive advantage in conversation better. I think what a lot of folks are clumsily getting at is that there is almost nowhere that practically applies so why worry, but I think the more nuanced answer probably is

07.08.2025 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m ready to get ready this weekend though, reading the season preview magazine, flipping through the weekend schedules to notice cool match-ups, figuring out who the broadcast teams are I’ll be annoyed by, etc.

07.08.2025 12:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, it feels like there was a pivot to the ending she got too partway through, there was decent ground laid for payoff where a β€œwizard prince” whose atypical childhood let him bridge that community with everyone else was the key to defeating evil, and then it just pivoted

07.08.2025 11:56 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Remember all the brain Dave that went into domestic partnerships but not gay marriage as the winning β€œmiddle road” position, so freaking stupid to play those dumb games with bad faith people.

07.08.2025 02:27 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This was of course revealed long ago.

07.08.2025 00:46 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

How do we make Faine the federal government?

07.08.2025 01:16 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Always liked how early the Royal Navy started down its path of giving its most lethal warships embarrassing names.

Nothing worse than discovering you've just had the crap kicked out of you, in naval terms, by the "Peter Pomegranate"

05.08.2025 13:10 β€” πŸ‘ 802    πŸ” 163    πŸ’¬ 41    πŸ“Œ 16

@08mms is following 20 prominent accounts