Andrew Leach's Avatar

Andrew Leach

@aleach.ca.bsky.social

Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Alberta. Interested in climate change, constitutional law, and energy infrastructure. Find me here or on the web at aleach.ca.

9,905 Followers  |  892 Following  |  198 Posts  |  Joined: 08.08.2023  |  1.7981

Latest posts by aleach.ca on Bluesky

Canada’s National Inventory Report ## Canada's National Inventory Report Each year, Canada and all other signatories to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change submit [annual National Inventory Reports (NIRs)](https:/...

leachandrew.github.io/NIR/

27.04.2025 03:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 27.04.2025 03:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No. He hasn’t stopped with this delusional nonsense. β€œWe don’t need their oil. We don’t need their cars.” Don’t think for one minute this this is over. #cdnpoli

23.04.2025 22:51 β€” πŸ‘ 175    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 3

It shouldn't but, and I hope that remains true. But a free trade deal should also mean no tariffs, so I guess we'll see. But, if we get into turning off taps, the transshipment must be on the table.

03.02.2025 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The biggest issues are Sarnia and Montreal, which rely on Canadian crude moving through the US.

03.02.2025 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

From last night. Don't let anyone convince you that "we export crude and import the refined products back to Canada." that's not how it works.

03.02.2025 14:53 β€” πŸ‘ 78    πŸ” 33    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

It's rhetoric brought from other industries where the scarcity lies at different points in the supply chain. Little profit in logs relative to lumber or furniture. Trees are plentiful. Large oil resources remain relatively scarce.

03.02.2025 14:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

1. The returns on refining pale relative to extraction, and we're not short resources.
2. Labour has opportunity costs and refining is also one of the least labour intensive industries around.
3. We already do that.

Old, tired arguments based on mythology of where the margins lie in oil and gas.

03.02.2025 14:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

bsky.app/profile/alea...

03.02.2025 07:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

and that, in most months, we produce more than we need.

03.02.2025 07:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It should not be, but who knows?

03.02.2025 06:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Here's Canada's refined product sector. We basically produce what we use, with exports and imports on the margin for most products.

03.02.2025 06:36 β€” πŸ‘ 61    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

In theory, almost all of it.

03.02.2025 06:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We produce most of our own products. The bigger issue is that we move a lot of our crude *through* the US to Ontario and QC.

03.02.2025 06:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Very small net exporters.

03.02.2025 06:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Short production curtailment of what? Products? Or crude + bitumen?

03.02.2025 05:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Why?

03.02.2025 05:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's EIA data for the US.

03.02.2025 05:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't understand what you mean? Almost all of our refined products do remain in the domestic market.

03.02.2025 05:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Too many Canadians are under the impression that we export crude and import refined products in our trade relationship with the US. The first is true, and the second is true to a much smaller degree only in some parts of Canada for some fuels. In general, we're net exporters of refined products too.

03.02.2025 03:57 β€” πŸ‘ 97    πŸ” 27    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

Offered without comment: almost all of the US supply of nuclear fuel is imported. Here's where it comes from:

01.02.2025 05:11 β€” πŸ‘ 249    πŸ” 102    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 7

Oh, hello existential dread and related feelings.

31.01.2025 17:13 β€” πŸ‘ 65    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0

Correct.

31.01.2025 16:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There was never a time when every hard worker had a pension. And if you factor in the share that are public sector here, a class of people PP likely doesn't think of as hard workers on the whole, the story gets even more ridiculous.

31.01.2025 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We're going to go back to a time when every worker had powerful paycheques...

31.01.2025 16:04 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wait, you're saying that every hard worker in Canada didn't have a powerful paycheque and a pension before Trudeau took office? Shocked.

31.01.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Y-axis is, yes.

31.01.2025 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Share of pension coverage. Sorry, my screenshot cut off.

31.01.2025 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

When was this Canada where "everyone who works hard gets a powerful paycheque and a pension?" And given that much of our remaining pension coverage is in the public service, how is PP going to make this happen? Expand the PS? Force private companies to offer pensions? Push unionization? What?

31.01.2025 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 73    πŸ” 21    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 1

FWIW, I think the proportionality clause was and remains wrongly read by many, including Laxer. It does not place the burden on us that some have pretended.

31.01.2025 06:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@aleach.ca is following 20 prominent accounts