Qualtrics is getting too expensive and our institute is considering switching to another survey software.
What can you recommend?
Needs to be user friendly, have reasonable support, handle similar features to Qualtrics, and be cheaper.
@aurelienallard.bsky.social
Philosopher and Social Psychologist. Assistant professor at Nantes University. Studying justice, morality, replicability and open science. Personal website: https://aurelienallard.netlify.app/
Qualtrics is getting too expensive and our institute is considering switching to another survey software.
What can you recommend?
Needs to be user friendly, have reasonable support, handle similar features to Qualtrics, and be cheaper.
I just reread this old piece of mine and I don't want to brag but it's quite good.
22.02.2026 00:37 — 👍 42 🔁 5 💬 3 📌 0Reading about the Icelandic Constitutional Council, which had some...issues with working class representation
21.02.2026 09:50 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Top panel: My plot of US adult female and male height distributions, which are much narrower, and overlap less than in the figure from Fuentes, which is in the bottom panel.
1. After I posted my critical review of @anthrofuentes.bsky.social Sex is a Spectrum, a colleague pointed out that his figure of adult heights by sex (bottom panel👇) can't be right: there aren't that many US adults shorter than 4' or taller than 7'
Turns out Fuentes' data are made up 🧪 #BioAnth 🧵
If you were to create a philosophy of LLM course, what kinds of things would you cover?
My thoughts in thread, but eager to hear what others would do
Paper on statistical power necessary for interaction effects
doi.org/10.1177/2515...
@cameronbuckner.bsky.social and @raphaelmilliere.com have a great philosophical introduction to LLMs. It is divided into two parts. The topics they discuss could be useful in the building of your syllabus:
First part: arxiv.org/abs/2401.03910
Second part: arxiv.org/abs/2405.03207
With all due respect to the authors (the study raises a “potential” concern), but its framing overstates that concern imo. A few things worth flagging before everyone panics 1/
19.02.2026 21:31 — 👍 30 🔁 9 💬 3 📌 1The stages of online samples in my research career:
1. too difficult/expensive/unrepresentative
2. too expensive but representative
3. pretty affordable but less representative
4. cheap and full of bots with garbage responses
5. wide price range and maybe full of non-people pretending to be people
What is Open Science? 💡 Episode 59 is out now, where Lisanne de Moor spoke with @simine.com about the history, development, and future of Open Science in the field of personality psychology. Check it out!
18.02.2026 23:54 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Je viens de découvrir un tableau exhaustive « Relevé des sanctions disciplinaires prononcées » par le CNRS par année. On peut voir un peu l'échelle des peines :
Par exemple : cadeau d'un ouvrage de dessins à caractère érotique => avertissement
Team "Elsevier Highlights Subversion" strikes again! Best one yet!
@deankarlan.bsky.social, Monica Lambon-Quayefio, Utsav Manjeer, @christopher-udry.bsky.social
”Most of the applications of clustering are not well thought out, not even considering whether observation clustering aligns with clinical goals.”
YES.
Clustering has become a huge fad in psychology as well, I see it everywhere.
Book cover. A silhouette of a person's head filled with colorful geometric shapes—perhaps symbolizing cognitive resources or deployment thereof. The style is attractive and modern, if generic. text: The Rational Use of Cognitive Resources Falk Lieder, Frederick Callaway, Thomas L. Griffithts
I'm excited to announce that I had my first (co-authored) book published today! "The Rational Use of Cognitive Resources" with Falk Lieder and Tom Griffiths (@cocoscilab.bsky.social ). You can read it for free! (see thread)
18.02.2026 01:05 — 👍 137 🔁 44 💬 2 📌 0yeah it's one thing to go making things up like philosophy, but its another to go *looking* for the made up stuff
that's another level
poor bee GOLD_07, whose embarrassing mistake has been immortalised in a way beyond his comprehension
17.02.2026 21:19 — 👍 29 🔁 10 💬 2 📌 0I go back to this regularly, and it's always a fun and entertaining read: XKCD's color survey where he prompted ~230k users to write down color names for randomly shown colors. Data available online.
blog.xkcd.com/2010/05/03/c...
« "Nous avons comptabilisé 57 morts, dont 52 attribués à l'ultradroite et 5 à l'ultragauche de 1986 à 2021", relève Xavier Crettiez. "La violence politique est aujourd'hui très faible. Le dernier événement comparable à la mort de Quentin, c'est celle de Clément Méric en 2013" » tinyurl.com/576ef3w7
17.02.2026 07:56 — 👍 158 🔁 147 💬 4 📌 13Problem about the loneliness epidemic is, it's everywhere except in representative survey data. Let's look at where the claim comes from. 1/
17.02.2026 07:13 — 👍 595 🔁 227 💬 21 📌 34New blogpost about a teaching experiment I'm doing this quarter: a "socratic tutor" bot to help students gain understanding of specific reading assignments.
babieslearninglanguage.blogspot.com/2026/02/an-l...
Looking forward to work with @fierycushman.bsky.social and @rebeccasaxe.bsky.social on the moral psychology of authority!
16.02.2026 17:24 — 👍 52 🔁 4 💬 8 📌 0Votre article du dimanche soir: l'invention d'un prix Nobel ou le narcissisme académique dans toute sa splendeur. Incroyable enquête de l'Est Républicain
www.estrepublicain.fr/faits-divers...
On why the motherhood penalty may be overestimated. Simply put: The identifying variation comes from women having kids at different points in time, which might not be a valid counterfactual. open.substack.com/pub/plausibl...
15.02.2026 16:21 — 👍 36 🔁 4 💬 5 📌 2A review of the proceedings from four major computer-science conferences showed that none from 2021, and all from 2025, had fake citations.
arxiv.org/abs/2602.058...
#AI #LLMs #Hallucinations #Misconduct #ScholComm
Just an aside: 41 of the 100 meta analyses published in Psych Bull between 2023 and 2025 do not include *any* quality screening of identified studies. To the degree that those literatures include bad studies, they are being laundered together with the good ones.
14.02.2026 11:15 — 👍 29 🔁 6 💬 4 📌 1What is the meaning of life? 🧪
Some will say "There is none!" But the question has niggled people at least since the The Epic of Gilgamesh, written more than 4000 years ago.
It seems having a positive impact on others is key to feeling your life has meaning. www.newscientist.com/article/2513...
Today in that-didn't-happen: Cohen's d = 22.
Williams et al. (2014) has 145 citations, putting it in top 1% of most cited psych articles.
It is a load-bearing publication in its area, despite having impossible results.
pubpeer.com/publications...
Meta-scientists cannot demand transparency from scientists while failing to meet those same standards. In this paper we make one simple recommendation: meta-scientific data should be deanonymised by default.
13.02.2026 16:59 — 👍 20 🔁 5 💬 2 📌 0