Liked the story and scenery (I recognized some parts actually filmed in Newport) but didn't feel the chemistry. Reminded me a little of Kate and Leopold.
04.11.2025 01:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
@psuenjay.bsky.social
Liked the story and scenery (I recognized some parts actually filmed in Newport) but didn't feel the chemistry. Reminded me a little of Kate and Leopold.
04.11.2025 01:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@brambledan.bsky.social, @deckthehallmark.bsky.social
03.09.2025 01:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thank you to Friends of the Everglades for standing up against “Alligator Alcatraz.”
06.08.2025 21:49 — 👍 10858 🔁 2522 💬 128 📌 70Not the most important issue, but this just strikes me as the type of things that voters HATE.
The army corps of engineers wouldn’t raise a river’s level for *your* family’s vacation.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
"Reich citizenship will not be laid in the cradle of every one born in Germany, but will be ceremoniously conferred on him after he has shown himself worthy of it through special accomplishments, through loyal services to the State." NY Times, July 6, 1933.
12.07.2025 20:18 — 👍 13239 🔁 6468 💬 440 📌 528Imagine if Kamala Harris had posted an image of herself as Wonder Woman. Or if even someone associated with the Dem party or campaign had done so. Jake Tapper would do an entire monologue about it. This won’t even get a mention because they judge Trump on the biggest curve in human history.
11.07.2025 02:47 — 👍 66 🔁 12 💬 2 📌 1The NYT, WaPo and WSJ are filled with stories about AI, often about how amazing it is. Right now, WaPo has a prominent story about an AI band blowing up; WSJ raves about Dove using AI to sell soap.
Elon Musk's AI went full Nazi...and WSJ+WaPo have no story (yet) and the NYT's is buried and small.
#Baltimore Mayor #BrandonScott invested in 42 summer youth camps, 29 literacy programs, extended the rec center hours to 11 p.m, planned block parties, opened the pools for safe fun, & opened several schools up for summer classes. Crime is down 62%. 🔥🔥 www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/202...
05.07.2025 20:29 — 👍 5383 🔁 1799 💬 79 📌 250I just finished that.
06.07.2025 23:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"Sprites are TLEs or Transient Luminous Events, that happen above the clouds and are triggered by intense electrical activity in the thunderstorms below," wrote Ayers in an X post showcasing the image. "We have a great view above the clouds, so scientists can use these types of pictures to better understand the formation, characteristics, and relationship of TLEs to thunderstorms."
U.S. astronaut Nichole Ayers captured a spectacular view of a phenomenon known as a "sprite" blazing to life above an intense thunderstorm — and she did this while orbiting 400 km above Earth aboard the International Space Station (ISS)
06.07.2025 13:25 — 👍 969 🔁 299 💬 10 📌 27Adopted this little dude yesterday after fostering for 2 weeks.
06.07.2025 22:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0FBI says a "targeted terrorist attack" occured at an event in Colorado calling for the release of Israeli hostages.
www.cbsnews.com/colorado/new...
Horrified by today’s terror attack in Colorado.
Antisemitism has no place in our nation and we must continue to unite together against such hatred.
Our hearts are with the victims and their loved ones.
Headline from the independent: Trump gives rambling speech about trophy wives, golf and the 'great late' Al Capone in politically-charged West Point address
Headline from the New York Times: Trump Gives Commencement Address at West Point, Stressing a New Era
Hard to believe they’re talking about the same event.
25.05.2025 07:39 — 👍 12286 🔁 3626 💬 364 📌 447So…about AI’s energy use…
“…to create a five-second video, a newer AI model uses ‘about 3.4 million joules, more than 700 times the energy required to generate a high-quality image’. That's the equivalent of running a microwave for over an hour.”
The 2024 Data Don't Lie:
The only issue voters can clearly associate with the modern D Party is support for gay rights.
That's it.
Voters are 50/50 on which party is on SS and Medicare.
Yes, really.
That's why we need to leave pound them on the economy and critical programs like Medicaid.
To me this seems like an attempt evade accountability; it’s much harder to find a quote of the crazy thing the President said when you need to search through a 90 minute madcap press availability rather than just hit ctrl+f
22.05.2025 01:46 — 👍 554 🔁 143 💬 35 📌 7Horrified to hear of the shooting at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, DC.
Shortly after the incident, I learned a team member was attending the event. While they're shaken up, they're safe.
MK and I are praying for the victims and their families and all those affected.
This is what an authoritarian regime would do. Hidden deep in Trump’s 1,100-page bill that passed the House today is a provision that would block federal courts from enforcing contempt charges against government officials who violate court orders.
23.05.2025 00:50 — 👍 6439 🔁 2653 💬 216 📌 208American politics makes a lot more sense when you realize that the GOP is afraid of pissing off the GOP base, and the Dems are afraid of pissing off the GOP base, but neither party is afraid of pissing off the Dem base.
14.03.2025 22:24 — 👍 53404 🔁 13400 💬 1480 📌 1332In a normal government (responsive to a normal democratic feedback loop), the Trump FAA rolling disaster would have already resulted in multiple high-level resignations.
www.denverpost.com/2025/05/15/d...
Advisory to Journalists: The Dangerous Expansion of the Federal Wiretap Law Journalists, podcasters, and digital media professionals beware: the U.S. government is currently advancing a legal theory under 18 U.S.C. § 2511—the federal wiretap statute—that threatens to criminalize the mere act of downloading publicly available videos or listening to podcasts. This interpretation risks not only chilling investigative journalism but undermines the very foundation of freedom of the press. The federal wiretap law makes it a felony to intentionally “intercept”—that is, acquire the contents of—a “wire communication” unless you are a party to the communication or a party has given prior consent. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2510(1), a "wire communication" includes any transfer containing the human voice that travels at any point by wire or cable. Originally meant to prevent unlawful phone taps in 1968, the statute has not meaningfully evolved to reflect digital media distribution in the 21st century. As a result, many core journalistic practices today—listening to audio on a video stream, downloading a podcast, reviewing livestreamed footage—can be construed as “intercepting” a wire communication. And unlike “oral communications” (which are only protected if private) or “electronic communications” (which are exempt if publicly accessible), wire communications have no similar public-access defense. This leaves journalists legally vulnerable for accessing material that is otherwise freely available to the public. This is not just a theoretical risk. In Tampa, Florida, the U.S. Department of Justice is actively prosecuting my client, journalist Timothy Burke for allegedly violating the wiretap statute by downloading publicly accessible livestreamed interviews from a video server. The journalist used only a URL—no password, no hack, no deception. The government claims that because the streams included the human voice and were transmitted in part by wire or cable, they are “wire communications”. Under this interpretation, even if the stream was intended for public consumption, and even if no reasonable expectation of privacy existed, the act of acquiring and publishing the content becomes a federal felony. The government also asserts that the same communications are also “electronic communications,” where the law makes it clear that it is not a violation if the electronic communication is obtained from a server that is configured so that the communication is “readily accessible to the general public” -- however, the government has argued (and the court has agreed) that whether or not the communication was obtained from a publicly accessible server is a fact question that the journalist must prove at trial - not an element of the offense that the government must prove. This means that a journalist that obtains public information may still be subject to search, seizure, arrest, indictment and prosecution. The implications for the First Amendment are chilling. Under the government’s interpretation of interception of “wire communications”, the government could prosecute journalists based not on their methods, but on the content they choose to listen to or report on. The wiretap law also criminalizes the disclosure of the contents of a wire communication. Thus, quoting from a podcast or a leaked livestream could subject a reporter to criminal liability regardless of intent, public interest, or harm. This is a dangerous expansion of government authority. It converts the passive act of receiving a communication—something essential to journalism—into a criminal offense based solely on outdated statutory definitions and prosecutorial discretion. The broader issue is not just technical—it’s constitutional. A law that is so vague or overbroad that it allows the government to pick and choose whom to prosecute based on their speech, targets the very heart of press freedom. It is unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment and overbroad under the First. By failing to modernize the statute—or at least to interpret it in line with modern communication platforms—the government risks turning millions of journalists, researchers, and citizens into potential criminals. The law as it stands today is an anachronism of the analog era being misapplied in a digital one. If you are a journalist, you should be alarmed. If the DOJ’s current theory prevails, simply clicking “play” could one day lead to prosecution. The press cannot operate in an environment where the law punishes access to speech—particularly where that speech is both public and newsworthy. The press must not only report on this misuse of power, but challenge it—legally, politically, and publicly. Because the right to receive and report information is not just a constitutional luxury. It’s a democratic necessity. -- Mark Rasch MDRasch@gmail.com (301) 547-6925
The federal government is attempting a radical, massive expansion of what constitutes "wiretapping" that threatens everyone working in media/as a journalist today and I hope you'll read this and share it with everyone you know.
I'm not just fighting this for me. I'm fighting it for everyone.
The political media is obsessively relitigating the issue of Biden being too old and out of touch while the current president babbles incoherently at press conferences and regularly admits he's not the one making decisions on key policy matters.
15.05.2025 17:18 — 👍 6065 🔁 1538 💬 199 📌 86SCOOP: Since SSA installed new anti-fraud checks on claims made over the phone, only 2 claims out of over 110,000 were found to likely be fraudulent, according to internal documents I obtained.
The policy has slowed down payments, though. Retirement claim processing is down 25%
never let anybody tell u that evil does not exist
16.05.2025 00:09 — 👍 5631 🔁 945 💬 204 📌 55In previous administrations, this would have been an impeachable scandal.
27.04.2025 16:19 — 👍 1487 🔁 372 💬 37 📌 11I have confirmed twice that these materials were on a 10 year loan and were scheduled to be returned now.
This has nothing to do with Trump. I’m sorry that Rev. Brown perceived it that way. We need to stay on alert, but not prematurely sound the alarm.
I've heard execs/Wall St analysts take comfort in fact that consumer spending has held up even as consumer views of the economy are tanking. After all, revealed preferences matter!
But I wonder how much of that disconnect could be explained by cases like this (from a reader):
$4,029,000,000 for classified military space superiority programs;
inside the defense reconciliation bill is what will probably turn into a $4 billion giveaway to elon musk
27.04.2025 22:21 — 👍 715 🔁 247 💬 9 📌 7this guy is a world class asshole
26.04.2025 16:17 — 👍 17922 🔁 3790 💬 587 📌 212