شاہد بازی

Ello govnah

Barely know who that dude is, do you have evidence that he's any of what you're saying?

Literally said the same thing in my head lol

Ah true

I like the noticeable break in rhyme on the last line

AYO WTF

What/who are y’all talking about I’m curious

“rape apologia” HUH????

Yup, and same for every other Muslim American

Not to mention that the large amount of detransition studies show that detransitioners do so mainly due to transphobia or not being able to afford to transition, not because they found out they aren't actually trans.

Fin. /7

4: Those stats' articles aren't linked, but even so, the parentheses shown provide a bunch of insight.
/6

3: Considering the definition you cited for "cissexual", I do not know what you mean by describing someone who wants to medically transition as a cissexual. Someone who wants to alter their body like that very likely is not cissexual.
/5
bsky.app/profile/marz...

I'm not sure what this has to do with *legal, ideological* goals though, besides saying "less dysphoric trans people should (be able to) put up with the transphobia" which I don't think you're advocating for btw.
/4

2: Yes, I agree that medical transition is a serious thing to consider/do in your life, changing your social standing, especially in a transphobic society, is a serious undertaking.
/3

Hence why I asked you earlier: what is your *legal, ideological goal* in saying this stuff? Do you or do you not want less dysphoric trans people to be legally barred from accessing medical transition?
/2

1: Again, you saying and me agreeing that people with worse dysphoria need medical transition 'more than' those with less dysphoria has little to do with the *legal ramifications* that may come with that.
/1

I can see the point for an informed consent model that goes beyond "here's what's gonna happen, are you sure?", and maybe a GD diagnosis if necessary. But beyond that, other stuff sounds like infringement on bodily autonomy and unequal access to care.

Fin. /5

In regard to your comment about overmedicalization and detransitioning, what solution do you propose for this that doesn't involve restricting our rights to medical care?
/4

Definition of NONBINARY not binary: such as; not restricted to two things or parts; of, relating to, or being a system of numbers that does not use 2 as its base… See the full definition

Here's the definition for "nonbinary":
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/n...
"c or non-binary : relating to or being a person who identifies with or expresses a gender identity that is neither entirely male nor entirely female"
/3

A binary transgender person is a transgender person with a gender identity that is either and exclusively male or female.
/2

Addendum: In regards to your questioning of the words "binary" and "nonbinary", at this point I'm not sure what else to say other than "google is free":

So turns out google *isn't*, in fact, free - as far as I can google for "binary transgender", so I'll just explain it here:
/1

However, I'm not sure of the point in categorizing social livelihood based on how much/what type of dysphoria a trans person has, unless you're studying a different kind of statistic.

Fin. /6

3: Statistics would vary depending on what you're studying. If you're studying stats based on trans women alone, or trans men alone, or nonbinary people alone, in regards to our social standing (discrimination, jobs, housing, etc), sure that make sense to categorize.
/5

My main point is, it'd make more sense to research *all* types of trans people instead of prioritizing 1 group at the expense of another.
/4

As far as genetic/neurological research, I think they are categorized as well, though I'll have to check because it's been a long time since I'm read anything about trans brains.
/3

2: There are already different studies regarding binary and nonbinary trans people, the effect of types of gender-affirming/sex-affirming surgery on trans people, etc. Those largely have categorization, though mainly on the type of care provided, not the type of person studied.
/2

1: Why should the former issues take priority over the latter, especially when a mix of those categories can be found in 1 trans person? And what does this even look like in practice, if you don't intend on barring certain types of trans people from accessing medical care?
/1

Idk, that’s why I’m asking you:

Why is a differentiation between non-transitioning transgender people and transitioning transsexual people necessary*? Why is differentiation between trans people who want surgery and those who don’t necessary*?

*By “necessary“ I mean on a legal level mainly

Like what's your ideological goal in differentiating between trans people who do vs don't want transgender-related surgery (top, bottom, etc), or those who want HRT vs those who don't?

Fin. /4