David Stainer's Avatar

David Stainer

@davidstainer.bsky.social

Father, tax advisor, reader, quizzer. Posting in personal capacity.

378 Followers  |  487 Following  |  580 Posts  |  Joined: 17.10.2023  |  2.393

Latest posts by davidstainer.bsky.social on Bluesky

Mathematicians get their kicks on 8.1240384

08.08.2025 11:32 β€” πŸ‘ 771    πŸ” 146    πŸ’¬ 43    πŸ“Œ 15

😭😭😭

07.08.2025 20:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ah, d’oh.

07.08.2025 19:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ha, gave up on McEwan a couple of novels back, having been a completist, but that looks oddly tempting. Does the book really omit its own title? Bold.

07.08.2025 18:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Patient, sobbing: But Doctor, I AM Pagliacci!
ChatGPT: Apologies. I didn't realise when recommending Pagliacci's epic show to cure your depression that you were the genius himself. I'm impressed! With regards to your initial question, I can recommend seeing the Great Clown Pagliacci.

07.08.2025 11:31 β€” πŸ‘ 11628    πŸ” 2876    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 31

This one for me too.

05.08.2025 13:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Still from the 1941 film "Love on the Dole", with the unfortunate subtitle "She's a strange lassie's arsehole".

Still from the 1941 film "Love on the Dole", with the unfortunate subtitle "She's a strange lassie's arsehole".

Catastrophic subtitling on the 1941 movie "Love on the Dole".

(It should read "She's a strange lass, is our Sal"...)

03.08.2025 21:40 β€” πŸ‘ 3403    πŸ” 899    πŸ’¬ 95    πŸ“Œ 99
Post image

Love old papers. Fancy having such a list today!

30.07.2025 10:37 β€” πŸ‘ 182    πŸ” 49    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 13

I think this is truer about Scrabble. As soon as either of you care about learning words, β€œlet’s check that in OSW”, etc. it’s game over.

28.07.2025 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I said I fancied doing an evening class, so my wife booked me on an "Eat Like A Snake” course.

That'll teach me to open my big mouth.

12.09.2023 15:14 β€” πŸ‘ 138    πŸ” 21    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

No but I’m not sure I’ve seen people on this aspect before. But it’s really struck me recently how unusual for my social group to span from 20 somethings to 60 somethings.

22.07.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Agree so profoundly with this.

22.07.2025 17:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you. And, yes, I agree about ordinary usage.

20.07.2025 09:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I would think you’re probably right that they have the legal grounds for this but to me the case illustrates the definition is overly expansive. I would prefer criminal damage of this kind to be treated as such without regard to the motivation, not least as it does not then impact on third parties.

20.07.2025 09:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The bomb would bring into play the various elements around endangering people in a way paint in an engine doesn’t. Do you know how β€œserious” is assessed in this context? The bomb feels a lot more serious than paint to me but I don’t know how the law defines seriousness.

20.07.2025 09:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I think Judgement at Tokyo ticks the big theme box. Seriously good.

18.07.2025 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I must admit I doubted myself because although, in classic Grandad-style I remembered her as attractive, I - erm - didn’t remember her as *that* attractive.

17.07.2025 19:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Is it Virginia Bottomley?

17.07.2025 19:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
He never married - Wikipedia

Puts me in mind of this excellent Wikipedia page:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He_neve...

15.07.2025 20:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
A street sign reading β€˜Stalin Road’ with the start of a row of houses in the background.

A street sign reading β€˜Stalin Road’ with the start of a row of houses in the background.

There’s a small estate in Colchester commemorating the leaders of the WW2 Allies - Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin. The council has asked the residents of Stalin Road several times if they want to have it renamed, but the answer has always come back β€˜No’.

13.07.2025 09:27 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Magnificent.

13.07.2025 09:31 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This would certainly have been my thought (aged 47).

13.07.2025 08:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What family name links the winner of the 1860 Open and the winner of the 2018 Women’s Open? These golfers are of very different nationalities.

13.07.2025 08:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sorry, you acknowledged this in your post. But it can be worth digging deeper. Subsidiary titles, family properties, other tracts of land owned by them etc.

13.07.2025 08:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Noble landowners is always a good bet here. Not sure this particular case but certainly many cases in London.

13.07.2025 08:06 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Dorothea Lambert Chambers!

12.07.2025 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Fascinating the range of approaches to this. Some setters love to plough their interest furrows with every quiz they write. I try to shy away from it: always find it hard to judge difficulty on topics I know deeply and I don’t want people benefiting by revising all my favourite topics!

09.07.2025 22:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Very important work here from my learned friend @simonjtreanor.bsky.social .

08.07.2025 11:10 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

K-Pop and OK Boomer

07.07.2025 19:35 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
a Β½ gallon of neutral milk

a Β½ gallon of neutral milk

They finally made the milk from that hotel

06.07.2025 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 13673    πŸ” 2612    πŸ’¬ 149    πŸ“Œ 109

@davidstainer is following 20 prominent accounts