Budget 2025: Hyperactive Incrementalism and the Missing Long View - The Productivity Institute
The 2025 UK Budget had a glaring absence of any long-term economic strategy for growth and investment.
Following yesterday’s Budget, TPI’s @andywestwood.bsky.social @profdaverichards.bsky.social @drdarcyluke.bsky.social @samwarner.bsky.social and Patrick Diamond share insights on the government’s approach to growth and productivity.
Read more: bit.ly/3JVRkLi
27.11.2025 11:55 —
👍 5
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 1
The British library is in crisis: why does nobody care?
The widespread indifference to the British Library's crippling cyberattack demonstrates a perilous failure to value the knowledge infrastructure vital for national prosperity
I’ve written a piece on the curious lack of media and political interest in the issues faced by our national @britishlibrary.bsky.social. This is strange given we live in a world where ideas, knowledge and research are a long-term source of innovation and insight
www.cityam.com/the-british-...
18.11.2025 06:27 —
👍 1063
🔁 622
💬 35
📌 76
Is AI driving productivity in aggregate?
New figures from McKinsey suggest not:
1. Deployment is still fairly early stages - and in limited parts of companies - most commonly marketing, IT, knowledge management.
14.11.2025 11:32 —
👍 9
🔁 5
💬 2
📌 1
A Critical Appraisal of Labour's AI Agenda
This article critically evaluates Labour's ambitious AI agenda, situating it within the historical trajectory of UK AI policy and the techno-solutionist assumptions underpinning current strategies. W....
Pleased to have this piece out in @politicalquarterly.bsky.social. @nathancritch.bsky.social & I place Labour's ambitions for AI in the context of nearly a decade of AI policies to critically engage with the increasingly 'techno-solutionist' hype around AI.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
03.11.2025 13:13 —
👍 5
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
Industrial StrategyUK ParliamentDownload iconShare icon
Pleased to see evidence submitted with @nathancritch.bsky.social, Patrick Diamond, @profdaverichards.bsky.social, @samwarner.bsky.social & @andywestwood.bsky.social was referenced in the 7th Report on Industrial Strategy by the Business & Trade Committee.
publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cm...
24.06.2025 11:10 —
👍 5
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 1
Read the latest policy commentary on our website, which looks at whether the #SpendingReview2025 is far-reaching enough for the government's growth mission.
#productivity #growth #governance #policy
16.06.2025 08:48 —
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Really useful and interesting!
16.06.2025 11:32 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Re:Act: Spending Review 2025 - Re:State
Quite a good analysis of the SR here. Key points for me are governance reform is focussed on efficiency rather than transformation, and that missions remain goals rather than new joined-up approach: re-state.co.uk/react/react-...
12.06.2025 11:17 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Ah this is interesting devo news. London will get an integrated settlement after all from next year.
It'll be interesting to see how the model differs in London compared to the combined authorities, and whether it'll require constitutional change in the GLA-Council relationship to make it work
11.06.2025 12:37 —
👍 20
🔁 11
💬 1
📌 1
Where we should be building new towns if we want to prioritise growth - by Jack Shaw and me for @productivity.bsky.social
10.06.2025 11:00 —
👍 4
🔁 5
💬 2
📌 1
The Government said it’d cost £99bn to publicly own our water.
But this drew on calculations by — drumroll — water company lobbyists. The true cost is closer to zero.
Here’s why. 🧵
09.06.2025 07:28 —
👍 98
🔁 53
💬 2
📌 4
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
Really happy that my paper on Jim Bulpitt's statecraft interpretation is now properly out in the latest issue of the BJPIR. This is especially exciting given the issue marks the 25th anniversary of the journal and is chock-full of great stuff! Check it out here: journals.sagepub.com/toc/bpia/27/2
09.06.2025 10:31 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Call for Papers: What is a Parliament?
Are parliaments institutions, organisations, corporations or something else? Does it make sense to ask the question Who is Parliament? or should parliaments always be considered a thing or set of relations of some kind?
This interdisciplinary one-day workshop will consider such questions from all points of view, from the metaphysical to the political, historical, legal and anthropological, as well as how our different understandings of parliaments affect the way we study, critique and run them.
We welcome papers operating at all levels of abstraction and those concerned with concrete cases. Our aim is for the workshop to include scholars working in different academic disciplines, from different intellectual traditions, and who are at all career stages from PhD onwards.
If you are interested in presenting a paper, please send a title and abstract of no more than 250 words to Stephen Holden Bates (s.r.bates@bham.ac.uk) by 4th July 2025.
The workshop will be held on Friday 19th September 2025 in Birkbeck’s Keynes Library (46 Gordon Square, London). It is being co-convened by Stephen Holden Bates (University of Birmingham), Paul Seaward (History of Parliament Trust) and Ben Worthy (Birkbeck, University of London) and co-sponsored by the School of Social Sciences at Birkbeck, the Department of Political Science & International Studies at the University of Birmingham and PSA Parliaments.
The workshop will be free, and refreshments and lunch will be provided. Early career researchers who have a paper accepted will be able to apply for funding from PSA Parliaments to cover some or all travel expenses on a case-by-case basis.
📢📢📢 CfP: What is a Parliament?
Interdisciplinary workshop on 19th September 2025 in London.
Full details below.
Kindly sponsored by Birkbeck, the University of Birmingham and
@psa-parliaments.bsky.social
Please apply and/or spread the word!
27.05.2025 11:03 —
👍 5
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 0
Will be really interested to see where DSIT ends up in the spending review, will be key to seeing how serious government is on driving AI proliferation across the economy and growing Britain's AI sector.
03.06.2025 08:32 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Industrial Strategy - Written evidence - Committees - UK Parliament
Written evidence submission publications for Industrial Strategy.
Written evidence from @nathancritch.bsky.social, @profdaverichards.bsky.social, @samwarner.bsky.social, @andywestwood.bsky.social, Patrick Diamond and myself to Business & Trade Committee inquiry on Industrial Strategy has been published
You can read here: committees.parliament.uk/work/8882/in...
29.05.2025 14:48 —
👍 6
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
Produced as part of our ongoing work with the Institutions and Governance stream @productivity.bsky.social @manchester.ac.uk
27.05.2025 09:38 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
27.05.2025 08:14 —
👍 82
🔁 37
💬 7
📌 5
Glad to see this out - A critical examination of Labour's economic strategy, which we see as oriented around a devo agenda and industrial strategy, but one still shot through with the pathologies of the British state.
27.05.2025 08:35 —
👍 4
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
Roles currently needing filling:
- National Statistician
- DSIT perm sec
- Govt Chief Data Officer
- Govt Chief AI Officer
- Govt Chief Digital Officer
Reshuffle rumours around DSIT ministers too (though aren't there always etc)
Any others?
09.05.2025 12:28 —
👍 5
🔁 9
💬 2
📌 1
Agree wholeheartedly with this. Inquiries should make recommendations that would actually solve the problems they are tasked with investigating. When systems are in crisis, that will likely necessitate radical action, overhauling existing institutional arrangements, not "fine-tuning" them.
01.05.2025 13:24 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
💭NEW BLOG💭
Chris Saltmarsh and Dillon Wamsley develop Seven Theses on Crisis in capitalism, illuminated by their discussions with experts in their recent 12-part podcast series
📝Read the blog: shorturl.at/sfKqO
🎧Listen to the series: shorturl.at/wxXZJ
29.04.2025 08:57 —
👍 1
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Really enjoyed this panel. Great presentations and interesting questions and comments all round!
16.04.2025 07:19 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0