Nathan Critch's Avatar

Nathan Critch

@nathancritch.bsky.social

Research associate @manchester.ac.uk‬ working in political economy, governance, and British politics. Currently doing research on post-crisis public inquiries, British economic governance in wake of GFC, and the political economy of AI.

76 Followers  |  83 Following  |  18 Posts  |  Joined: 12.12.2024  |  2.2766

Latest posts by nathancritch.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Tuition fees are rising again and nobody is happy – it’s time to actually fix our broken university sector | Zoe Williams The figures simply don’t add up for higher education in England and Wales. Yet delusional politicians from all parties seem intent on avoiding the issue, says Guardian columnist Zoe Williams

Education is a public good which should be funded out of general taxation. Anyone who wants to defend our universities needs to firmly and repeatedly insist on this point, and not concede an inch to the facile Thatcherite logic that got us into this mess.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

08.08.2025 06:58 — 👍 38    🔁 19    💬 0    📌 0
Industrial StrategyUK ParliamentDownload iconShare icon

Pleased to see evidence submitted with @nathancritch.bsky.social, Patrick Diamond, @profdaverichards.bsky.social, @samwarner.bsky.social & @andywestwood.bsky.social was referenced in the 7th Report on Industrial Strategy by the Business & Trade Committee.

publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cm...

24.06.2025 11:10 — 👍 5    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 1

Read the latest policy commentary on our website, which looks at whether the #SpendingReview2025 is far-reaching enough for the government's growth mission.
#productivity #growth #governance #policy

16.06.2025 08:48 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Really useful and interesting!

16.06.2025 11:32 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
From a fragile to an agile state: is the Spending Review enough to enable the Starmer government to deliver on its growth mission? - The Productivity Institute The 2025 Spending Review set out major capital spending, but will it be enough to boost productivity growth?

A short piece on the Spending Review written for the @productivity.bsky.social with my colleagues @nathancritch.bsky.social, @profdaverichards.bsky.social, @samwarner.bsky.social, @andywestwood.bsky.social & Patrick Diamond.

www.productivity.ac.uk/news/from-a-...

14.06.2025 05:16 — 👍 6    🔁 4    💬 1    📌 2
Preview
Re:Act: Spending Review 2025 - Re:State

Quite a good analysis of the SR here. Key points for me are governance reform is focussed on efficiency rather than transformation, and that missions remain goals rather than new joined-up approach: re-state.co.uk/react/react-...

12.06.2025 11:17 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Ah this is interesting devo news. London will get an integrated settlement after all from next year.

It'll be interesting to see how the model differs in London compared to the combined authorities, and whether it'll require constitutional change in the GLA-Council relationship to make it work

11.06.2025 12:37 — 👍 20    🔁 11    💬 1    📌 1

Where we should be building new towns if we want to prioritise growth - by Jack Shaw and me for @productivity.bsky.social

10.06.2025 11:00 — 👍 4    🔁 5    💬 2    📌 1
Post image

The Government said it’d cost £99bn to publicly own our water.

But this drew on calculations by — drumroll — water company lobbyists. The true cost is closer to zero.

Here’s why. 🧵

09.06.2025 07:28 — 👍 99    🔁 53    💬 2    📌 4
Preview
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

Really happy that my paper on Jim Bulpitt's statecraft interpretation is now properly out in the latest issue of the BJPIR. This is especially exciting given the issue marks the 25th anniversary of the journal and is chock-full of great stuff! Check it out here: journals.sagepub.com/toc/bpia/27/2

09.06.2025 10:31 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Call for Papers: What is a Parliament?
Are parliaments institutions, organisations, corporations or something else? Does it make sense to ask the question Who is Parliament? or should parliaments always be considered a thing or set of relations of some kind?
This interdisciplinary one-day workshop will consider such questions from all points of view, from the metaphysical to the political, historical, legal and anthropological, as well as how our different understandings of parliaments affect the way we study, critique and run them.
We welcome papers operating at all levels of abstraction and those concerned with concrete cases. Our aim is for the workshop to include scholars working in different academic disciplines, from different intellectual traditions, and who are at all career stages from PhD onwards.
If you are interested in presenting a paper, please send a title and abstract of no more than 250 words to Stephen Holden Bates (s.r.bates@bham.ac.uk) by 4th July 2025.  
The workshop will be held on Friday 19th September 2025 in Birkbeck’s Keynes Library (46 Gordon Square, London). It is being co-convened by Stephen Holden Bates (University of Birmingham), Paul Seaward (History of Parliament Trust) and Ben Worthy (Birkbeck, University of London) and co-sponsored by the School of Social Sciences at Birkbeck, the Department of Political Science & International Studies at the University of Birmingham and PSA Parliaments.
The workshop will be free, and refreshments and lunch will be provided. Early career researchers who have a paper accepted will be able to apply for funding from PSA Parliaments to cover some or all travel expenses on a case-by-case basis.

Call for Papers: What is a Parliament? Are parliaments institutions, organisations, corporations or something else? Does it make sense to ask the question Who is Parliament? or should parliaments always be considered a thing or set of relations of some kind? This interdisciplinary one-day workshop will consider such questions from all points of view, from the metaphysical to the political, historical, legal and anthropological, as well as how our different understandings of parliaments affect the way we study, critique and run them. We welcome papers operating at all levels of abstraction and those concerned with concrete cases. Our aim is for the workshop to include scholars working in different academic disciplines, from different intellectual traditions, and who are at all career stages from PhD onwards. If you are interested in presenting a paper, please send a title and abstract of no more than 250 words to Stephen Holden Bates (s.r.bates@bham.ac.uk) by 4th July 2025. The workshop will be held on Friday 19th September 2025 in Birkbeck’s Keynes Library (46 Gordon Square, London). It is being co-convened by Stephen Holden Bates (University of Birmingham), Paul Seaward (History of Parliament Trust) and Ben Worthy (Birkbeck, University of London) and co-sponsored by the School of Social Sciences at Birkbeck, the Department of Political Science & International Studies at the University of Birmingham and PSA Parliaments. The workshop will be free, and refreshments and lunch will be provided. Early career researchers who have a paper accepted will be able to apply for funding from PSA Parliaments to cover some or all travel expenses on a case-by-case basis.

📢📢📢 CfP: What is a Parliament?

Interdisciplinary workshop on 19th September 2025 in London.

Full details below.

Kindly sponsored by Birkbeck, the University of Birmingham and
@psa-parliaments.bsky.social

Please apply and/or spread the word!

27.05.2025 11:03 — 👍 5    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0

Will be really interested to see where DSIT ends up in the spending review, will be key to seeing how serious government is on driving AI proliferation across the economy and growing Britain's AI sector.

03.06.2025 08:32 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Industrial Strategy - Written evidence - Committees - UK Parliament Written evidence submission publications for Industrial Strategy.

Written evidence from @nathancritch.bsky.social, @profdaverichards.bsky.social, @samwarner.bsky.social, @andywestwood.bsky.social, Patrick Diamond and myself to Business & Trade Committee inquiry on Industrial Strategy has been published

You can read here: committees.parliament.uk/work/8882/in...

29.05.2025 14:48 — 👍 6    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0

Produced as part of our ongoing work with the Institutions and Governance stream @productivity.bsky.social @manchester.ac.uk

27.05.2025 09:38 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Will Labour's Governance Approach Lead to Mission Success or Mission Failure? Abstract Since coming to power in July 2024, the Starmer government’s approach to reform has rhetorically focussed on the centralised, short-term, and fragmented nature of British policymaking and th...

Very pleased to have this piece, co-authored with @nathancritch.bsky.social, Patrick Diamond, @profdaverichards.bsky.social, Sam Warner & @andywestwood.bsky.social, in @renewaljournal.bsky.social.

renewal.org.uk/blog/will-la...

27.05.2025 08:50 — 👍 11    🔁 9    💬 1    📌 2
27.05.2025 08:14 — 👍 82    🔁 37    💬 7    📌 5

Glad to see this out - A critical examination of Labour's economic strategy, which we see as oriented around a devo agenda and industrial strategy, but one still shot through with the pathologies of the British state.

27.05.2025 08:35 — 👍 4    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

Roles currently needing filling:
- National Statistician
- DSIT perm sec
- Govt Chief Data Officer
- Govt Chief AI Officer
- Govt Chief Digital Officer

Reshuffle rumours around DSIT ministers too (though aren't there always etc)

Any others?

09.05.2025 12:28 — 👍 5    🔁 9    💬 2    📌 1

Agree wholeheartedly with this. Inquiries should make recommendations that would actually solve the problems they are tasked with investigating. When systems are in crisis, that will likely necessitate radical action, overhauling existing institutional arrangements, not "fine-tuning" them.

01.05.2025 13:24 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

💭NEW BLOG💭

Chris Saltmarsh and Dillon Wamsley develop Seven Theses on Crisis in capitalism, illuminated by their discussions with experts in their recent 12-part podcast series

📝Read the blog: shorturl.at/sfKqO

🎧Listen to the series: shorturl.at/wxXZJ

29.04.2025 08:57 — 👍 1    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

Really enjoyed this panel. Great presentations and interesting questions and comments all round!

16.04.2025 07:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Fragmented and Dealigned: The 2024 British General Election and the Rise of Place-Based Politics The 2024 election exposed a fragmented and marginal map, bequeathing a fragile electoral future, despite the Starmer government's large parliamentary majority.

Research by @drjennings.bsky.social @jwfurlong.bsky.social Gerry Stoker and @lawrencemckay.bsky.social finds the electorate now more volatile, discontented, dealigned and fragmented.

Read the blog now: politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/fragmen...

#UKpol #politics

11.04.2025 09:26 — 👍 3    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Rachel Reeves' Spring Statement seems to be a continuity of Treasury fiscal conservatism, guided by short-term economic projections rather than a long-term vision, argue @nathancritch.bsky.social, @drdarcyluke.bsky.social, David Richards and @samwarner.bsky.social.

blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandp...

28.03.2025 11:35 — 👍 5    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 1

Pleased @lsepoliticsblog.bsky.social have published this piece on the Spring Statement co-written with @nathancritch.bsky.social, @samwarner.bsky.social & David Richards.

We argue the Spring Statement signals a return of Treasury orthodoxy which may undermine Labour's bolder plans for change.

28.03.2025 11:43 — 👍 4    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0

Check out our new article on the unique crisis shaping British politics 👇

27.03.2025 10:44 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Perry Anderson · Regime Change in the West? Where amid this turmoil does neoliberalism stand? In emergency conditions it has been forced to take measures –...

Regime Change in the West? www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

27.03.2025 10:43 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

New blog piece contextualising Labour's approach to AI in light of the Paris AI summit.

@nathancritch.bsky.social and I argue that the UK is plotting it's own course on AI regulation as part of an ambitious domestic agenda for AI.

Thanks to @mileendinstitute.bsky.social for publishing!

18.03.2025 13:49 — 👍 2    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
The UK in the AI regulation debate: In hoc with Trump’s America or going their own way?

New blog out with @drdarcyluke.bsky.social on the government's AI strategy and approach to regulating AI, which situates it in the broader context of the approaches previous UK governments developed towards AI. A fascinating and increasingly important topic!

www.qmul.ac.uk/mei/news-and...

18.03.2025 14:06 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch claims the UK goal of net zero emissions by 2050 is impossible.
• No alternative date offered
• No report/analysis showing impossible
• No detail on how/why impossible
• No figure on £ impact of net zero despite claiming will "bankrupt us"
• No new plan to cut energy bills

18.03.2025 09:36 — 👍 280    🔁 93    💬 32    📌 10
Post image

Good time to reread @stuarthoddinott.bsky.social piece analysing the resignation of NHSE chief executive. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/aman...

13.03.2025 11:27 — 👍 11    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0

@nathancritch is following 20 prominent accounts