Marius S. 's Avatar

Marius S.

@unmariuss.bsky.social

I still think Tumblr is the best social media.

183 Followers  |  283 Following  |  1,647 Posts  |  Joined: 20.10.2023  |  1.9259

Latest posts by unmariuss.bsky.social on Bluesky

Golly, that is *excellent*

15.11.2025 19:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 13    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

He's not even doing a Biden because Biden wasn't afraid of radical economic reforms and passed two stimulus packages worth over 10% of GDP

14.11.2025 18:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

They're diversifying suppliers. It's normal to start buying resources from the second biggest producer when you want to decouple from the first.

13.11.2025 20:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes sure, if only they had faced each other in an election or something. I guess we'll never know for sure.

12.11.2025 08:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh god AI powered NIMBYs this really is the worst timeline

09.11.2025 18:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 40    ๐Ÿ” 10    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Just came out of the cinema and our first comments were about how good he was

08.11.2025 19:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Controversial but I think this is a great idea and would love to see it applied in the West too. Willing to debate to what extent it should apply, but if youโ€™re a content creator, you should help some knowledge on the content you are creating.

08.11.2025 10:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Orban's effects will wear off the moment Macron, Merz, Starmer and Meloni call Trump.

Trump's brain is mush. All that sways him is the last person he's talked to.

07.11.2025 20:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 105    ๐Ÿ” 23    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I wouldn't bet on Orban being in power for much longer, Hungary won't be a long term option for them

07.11.2025 18:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

No, but you are functionally illiterate.

07.11.2025 18:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

No, I am not.

And I never said the government will see it as a defeat.

07.11.2025 18:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What words? What are you talking about? Are you replying to the right posts?

07.11.2025 17:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Honestly I donโ€™t want to insult you but you have no idea what youโ€™re talking about.

07.11.2025 17:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Which is likely whatโ€™s going to happen. But similar to the European defence fund, proportional contributions will be seen as a defeat in the UK

07.11.2025 17:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Advocating dependencies? Yes, of course. Look at the comments about the rearmament funding and the UKs insistence that its companies should be eligible for it

07.11.2025 17:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Youโ€™re making a mess of this, doesnโ€™t look like you know what youโ€™re talking about. The TCA is already in place, current negotiations are about a new โ€œresetโ€ deal and as the negotiations are just now happening thereโ€™s no commitment to renege. The TCA does not cover SPF

07.11.2025 17:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And you personally should stick to silver earrings because this seems to be above your level.
Nobody is forcing the UK to make deals, and the UK needs to EU more than the other way around, including on security. You donโ€™t have to like it but reality will hit you in the face eventually

07.11.2025 17:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Then maybe you should ask to join the EEA ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ
The bottom line is that if you want spf recognition you have to be willing to give something in return. And what they want in return is money

07.11.2025 17:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

TCA does not provide SPF equivalence so if you want access similar to EEA then you should pay similar fees

07.11.2025 17:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think you need to read that paragraph againโ€ฆ

07.11.2025 16:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Have you read the article? Because thatโ€™s not what it says so not sure what youโ€™re talking about

07.11.2025 16:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Uhm, no, weโ€™re not talking about that. Weโ€™re talking about the UK contributing to the programs it wants to join, at the same rate as the rest of the members. What are you talking about?

07.11.2025 16:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

No agreement has been made, this is the negotiation stage and each party is going back and forth on what they want.

07.11.2025 16:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Of course the EU and UK should collaborate where they face common enemies but it is not in the EUs interest to develop dependencies with a country that might very well elect Farage as its leader. Collaboration and friendly relationship does not mean giving the UK a preferential place in its orbit

07.11.2025 16:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Good relationships does not mean dependencies or preferential access.

07.11.2025 16:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As an aspiring world power, it is not the EUโ€™s interest to develop a stronger relationship with the UK, it is UKs interest. Brits need to better understand the EUโ€™s position. Almost all member states are willing to collaborate, but theyโ€™ll only do it from a position of power, which is fair enough

07.11.2025 15:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Only Brits would think that 100 years old history is relevant to today's financial and security negotiations. Bless...

07.11.2025 10:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Apologies for thinking this is a serious person, I didn't realise you were a parody account.

07.11.2025 10:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What does Gibraltar or the Romans have to do with it? ๐Ÿคก

07.11.2025 09:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah yes, the UK guarding its own immediate area is for the EUโ€™s sake, not its own. Brexit derangement syndrome strikes again.

07.11.2025 09:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@unmariuss is following 20 prominent accounts