's Avatar

@mgreenfield.bsky.social

99 Followers  |  92 Following  |  821 Posts  |  Joined: 17.11.2024  |  2.3829

Latest posts by mgreenfield.bsky.social on Bluesky

MAGA: facts are what you want them to be

03.02.2026 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If we survive this, Minnesota will be known as the place where Democracy was reborn.

03.02.2026 15:40 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

To be fair, in any comparison Kristi Noem is going to come out looking bad.

03.02.2026 02:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Snowflakes. Each and every last one of them.

03.02.2026 01:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How long will the voters put up with her shtick?

03.02.2026 00:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 02.02.2026 22:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Most of them are in it for the sport of it anyway.

02.02.2026 22:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My sense is that most of them don’t care about the pay so much as are in it for the sport.

02.02.2026 22:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

From Google AI: Until Sept 2019 DoorDash used tips to subsidize drivers' guaranteed minimum pay, which reduced labor costs. Now 100% of tips go to drivers on top of base pay. A $16.75 million settlement was announced in early 2025 related to the past practice of misleading consumers.

01.02.2026 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seems to me an anti-Trump Republican candidate may have a chance to bring some disaffected Republicans to the polls.

01.02.2026 17:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just like Jonathon Ross

31.01.2026 21:19 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

…and you have a willingly and aggressively gullible cult following.

31.01.2026 19:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just the language itself is biased. I would call them, β€œchild enthusiasts.”

31.01.2026 14:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Are those black mugs where you’re supposed to place your bribe?

30.01.2026 17:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Arbeit macht frei?

30.01.2026 13:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

parade of horribles

30.01.2026 02:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Man, the Epstein-Trump files must be lit!

30.01.2026 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

She and Lindsey Graham lost their way after John McCain’s death

29.01.2026 23:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

2024, not 2025

29.01.2026 22:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Concede he won the 2020 election. That would be his second election to the presidency, making his 2024 election his third election and, thus, constitutionally void.

29.01.2026 21:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Concede he won 2020. That would be his second election, making his third election, in 2025, constitutionally void.

29.01.2026 21:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Just concede that he won his second election in 2020. His 2024 election, which would then be his third, would be Constitutionally void.

29.01.2026 04:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We should all agree that Trump won the 2020 election. That would be his second election to the presidency. Because the Constitution says someone can’t be elected more than twice, he was ineligible to be elected in 2024 and, therefore, cannot now be President. He should be removed.

29.01.2026 04:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why don’t we all just agree Trump won the election in 2020? That would mean he was elected twice and make him Constitutional prohibited from being elected a third time, in 2024. He could not be President now.

29.01.2026 04:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not sure why everyone isn’t just agreeing with Trump and saying he was actually elected in 2020. That would mean he was Constitutionally prohibited from being elected a third time in 2024 and he cannot be President now.

29.01.2026 04:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Slow clap?

28.01.2026 23:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Most punchable face in an administration of punchable faces.

28.01.2026 16:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Did you mean 72 hours?

28.01.2026 04:02 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I presume you’re referring to protocols of some elders, no?

28.01.2026 01:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, they are a suspect class, albeit not in the traditional legal sense.

28.01.2026 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@mgreenfield is following 20 prominent accounts