Robert C. Engen's Avatar

Robert C. Engen

@robertengen.bsky.social

Senior lecturer in war studies at Deakin University, working on the PME command and staff course in Canberra. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ in ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ, not going back. Military historian turned war studier turned wargame designer. Also a โ€œpretty good but donโ€™t quit your day jobโ€ artist.

595 Followers  |  258 Following  |  101 Posts  |  Joined: 17.09.2023  |  2.2585

Latest posts by robertengen.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Littoral Commander: Australia Designed by Robert Engen and Scott Jenkinson, Littoral Commander: Australia is an expansion to Sebastian Bae's critically acclaimedย Littoral Commander: Indo-Pacific.ย  LITTORAL COMMANDER: AUSTRALIA i...

Don't forget you can still order your pre-order copy of my forthcoming "Littoral Commander: Australia!" It is the first expansion featuring new national forces and a collaboration with the Australian Army Battle Lab! ๐Ÿฆ˜ ๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐ŸŽฒ
dietzfoundation.org/product/litt...

21.06.2025 22:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 48    ๐Ÿ” 8    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

I hadnโ€™t thought about that sketch in years but I think that really works

09.04.2025 20:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Starlinks for Ukraine are paid for by the Polish Digitization Ministry at the cost of about $50 million per year.
The ethics of threatening the victim of aggression apart, if SpaceX proves to be an unreliable provider we will be forced to look for other suppliers.

09.03.2025 11:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4904    ๐Ÿ” 1335    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 259    ๐Ÿ“Œ 117
01.03.2025 04:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 141    ๐Ÿ” 29    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

And did it spark joy?

27.02.2025 06:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The more you make the back end unreliable, the more the front end is eschewed. Nobody is buying your kit if you signal you will brick it on a whim.

21.02.2025 19:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 50    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

What he really wants is Canada as a non-voting occupied territory, not a state.

10.02.2025 06:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I want someone in the press to ask him what he thinks the effect of adding Canada to the union would be on the electoral college, when as a single state it would be wildly to the left of California.

10.02.2025 05:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€œAl seems to have more godparents than even Sleeping Beauty. And, regrettably, more than one significant prick.โ€ ๐Ÿ˜‚

01.02.2025 08:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 109    ๐Ÿ” 27    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

AI Anne Frank bothsidesing the Holocaust in todayโ€™s dystopian nightmare.

17.01.2025 13:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 27    ๐Ÿ” 9    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

You have indeed

15.01.2025 20:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The L5R roleplaying game has some awesome mechanics that I swiped for Siege Perilous. Fantastic game and setting. Borderline criminal that theyโ€™ve stopped working on it.

11.01.2025 21:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I tried tipping at a nice hotel the way the author suggested some years ago, and the desk clerk got flustered and went to tell her manager on me. Almost died of cringe and was left wondering wtf Iโ€™d done wrong. Havenโ€™t tried it since.

10.01.2025 13:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Looks to me as though the Democrats would be the ones to seriously benefit from actually annexing Canada. Thereโ€™s nothing in this for Trump beyond scaring a weaker trade partner when heโ€™s about to try to strike a new and much shittier deal.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And yeah sure they could take over ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ by force and just pillage what they wanted without absorbing us into their โ€œdemocracy.โ€ Theyโ€™ve always been able to do that at will. But thereโ€™s no scenario in which this is a less costly option than just trading with us. Which is why the US never has done it.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The only way to do it for Republicans would be to annex ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ and then find some way or reason to keep us as second class citizens, unable to vote, unable to effect the electoral college. Thats an unattractive sales pitch and one that is unlikely to result in compliance.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Either way, legitimately absorbing ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ loads the US with 41 million new people whose politics skew way left compared even to Democrats. This is a non-starter for Trump politically within his own party. Itโ€™d be like the early 19C debates over admitting new states to the union.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Now, Trump is a man who knows his electoral college math better than he knows the names of his children. In which of these scenarios does he come out ahead? ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ as one big state would be a second California. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ as individual states would *not* be swing states, except maybe Alberta and Sask.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Or say ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ is absorbed and each province becomes its own state. Territories can probably go on being territories.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But what about peaceful options? Say๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ is absorbed peacefully and becomes the 51st state. Just one state for the whole country. Doesnโ€™t seem likely but sure letโ€™s take him at his word.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It could be done as a military occupation and a territorial non-state status for ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, kind of like Puerto Rico. Plausible but *extremely expensive.* Much, much more expensive than just buying stuff from ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ, and with a high risk threshold that we wouldnโ€™t go quietly.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

From my perspective an actual US annexation of Canada needs to be put in the following perspective:

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Look, Iโ€™ve no doubt Trump wants to play hardball with Canada in trade negotiations and that weโ€™re in for hurt. But the annexation talk is a negotiating tactic, same as him insisting that we have nothing the US needs. It is meant to rattle Canadian leadership, which is in flux right now.

09.01.2025 05:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Australians low-key anxious today that Trump wants to annex Canada and not them.

06.01.2025 21:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I kept my PhD embargoed and non-public for years on the explicit advice of my publisher. It was not a secret, it was a non-compete issue for sales of the book that was based on the PhD.

06.01.2025 13:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
a cartoon of a woman with the words " do n't underestimate the importance of body language " below her ALT: a cartoon of a woman with the words " do n't underestimate the importance of body language " below her
21.12.2024 19:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€œBluesky is an echo chamberโ€

Yes of course it is, I tailored it to my taste, interests, opinions, and community. Iโ€™m here to have a good time, not argue with strangers lmao

15.12.2024 18:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7159    ๐Ÿ” 1536    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 70    ๐Ÿ“Œ 78

I have been taking my time deciding whether to restart a social media presence here and had just started crafting content again. But Iโ€™m not going to if community protection isnโ€™t taken seriously here. This sort of thing has killed friends of mine. @safety.bsky.app

14.12.2024 12:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I played more LC in the last twelve months than everything else combined and multiplied by two.

13.12.2024 13:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

For me itโ€™s design and have a life. I spent a depressingly small fraction of my time actually playing anything.

13.12.2024 13:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@robertengen is following 20 prominent accounts