Jim Lee's Avatar

Jim Lee

@jimlee21.bsky.social

1,366 Followers  |  233 Following  |  125 Posts  |  Joined: 16.11.2024  |  1.8594

Latest posts by jimlee21.bsky.social on Bluesky

Video thumbnail

So you should really watch this. Just 2 minutes. But a window into the truly radical nature of the people Trump is nominating.

When pressed today, the nominee to be Ambassador to South Africa refuses to oppose reinstituting laws to prevent black people from voting in America.

24.10.2025 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 5502    πŸ” 2253    πŸ’¬ 387    πŸ“Œ 284
Video thumbnail

🚨 Give this man a microphone. Speaking truth to power! ✊🏼
1/2

20.10.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 4474    πŸ” 1708    πŸ’¬ 89    πŸ“Œ 49

I am completely awestruck by the ease with which Mike Johnson lies on a daily basis. I'll never understand how such a transparently fraudulent "man of faith" can live with themselves. Life is too short to be that phony.

21.10.2025 14:46 β€” πŸ‘ 37304    πŸ” 7829    πŸ’¬ 2927    πŸ“Œ 668
Preview
More Than 170 U.S. Citizens Have Been Held by Immigration Agents. They’ve Been Kicked, Dragged and Detained for Days. The government does not track how often immigration agents grab citizens. So ProPublica did. Our tally β€” almost certainly incomplete β€” includes people who were held for days without a lawyer. And near...

Americans have been dragged, tackled, beaten, tased and shot by immigration agents.

They’ve had their necks kneeled on.

They’ve been held outside in the rain while in their underwear.

At least three citizens were pregnant when agents detained them.

By @nicolefoy.bsky.social

20.10.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 5406    πŸ” 2998    πŸ’¬ 150    πŸ“Œ 157

https://bsky.app/profile/ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3m3ixiulm422o

19.10.2025 16:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It must really make everyone working at US Attorneys Offices around the country and DOJ, from prosecutors to staff, proud to know that you serve under an admin that has wiped out the convictions and/or sentences of every Republican convicted of a crime over the last decade.

17.10.2025 22:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1805    πŸ” 542    πŸ’¬ 39    πŸ“Œ 11

If you care about decency in America, follow Jacob Soboroff

15.10.2025 02:23 β€” πŸ‘ 140    πŸ” 49    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 3

I think you are getting into heaven, George.

16.10.2025 19:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes

15.10.2025 13:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes

15.10.2025 13:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Sarah Matthews: "I'm not the one who changed. The Republican Party changed. I'm still a conservative, I believe in these values β€” that's why I'm speaking up and speaking out against Trump's abuses of democracy."

14.10.2025 00:40 β€” πŸ‘ 576    πŸ” 78    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image 13.10.2025 20:01 β€” πŸ‘ 30509    πŸ” 7680    πŸ’¬ 511    πŸ“Œ 288

For those who don’t intimately understand how news works and why Bari Weiss’s unearned elevation to head of CBS News matters, I’d recommend watching this in entirety. Also, will forever point out irony of how an admitted DEI hire thinks her hire was meritorious while Black people’s aren’t.

13.10.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1611    πŸ” 449    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 6
Bari Weiss: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
YouTube video by LastWeekTonight Bari Weiss: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

Superb & eviscerating take on the situation at CBS by John Oliver and @lastweektonight.com. As I’ve noted, the new billionaire owners create a mirrortocracy, pretend it’s a meritocracy & hire a mediocrity to get there. But it is not about innovating & supporting journalism.
youtu.be/gieTx_P6INQ

13.10.2025 15:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1072    πŸ” 263    πŸ’¬ 33    πŸ“Œ 10
Bari Weiss: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
YouTube video by LastWeekTonight Bari Weiss: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

Absolutely brutal.

13.10.2025 13:40 β€” πŸ‘ 6599    πŸ” 1973    πŸ’¬ 227    πŸ“Œ 305
Video thumbnail

On October 18th, millions of brave Americans will stand up and peacefully protest against the authoritarian disease metastasizing under Donald Trump.

No Thrones. No Crowns. No Kings. @gtconway.bsky.social

13.10.2025 12:01 β€” πŸ‘ 9789    πŸ” 3204    πŸ’¬ 213    πŸ“Œ 172
Post image 08.10.2025 16:00 β€” πŸ‘ 49    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Yes, familiar.

10.10.2025 00:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Boo ya

Wordle 1,569 2/6

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

06.10.2025 01:03 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Their Lips are Sealed At the Riyadh comedy festival, money is the only thing speaking freely. Meanwhile, our most vocal free speech defenders in comedy have remained notably silent about censorship in Saudi Arabia

Their Lips are Sealed... deeply impressive piece. What you get from Meredith Blake that you don't get elsewhere open.substack.com/pub/contrari...

02.10.2025 22:17 β€” πŸ‘ 110    πŸ” 29    πŸ’¬ 17    πŸ“Œ 4
03.10.2025 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Go NPR

03.10.2025 15:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

ER doc here! This is a lie. Wait times are up because the American healthcare system is an unsustainable business model and a for-profit national healthcare system just doesn’t work. These problems will continue to get worse until we change that system. It literally has nothing to do with immigrants

01.10.2025 18:49 β€” πŸ‘ 14845    πŸ” 5274    πŸ’¬ 341    πŸ“Œ 133

I know we're desensitized, but it's important to note, again, that today's events would have led to the immediate impeachment & removal of any president from at least Truman to at least Obama. We're hundreds of miles on the interstate past Richard Nixon's high school prank-level crimes compared to πŸ‘‡

30.09.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 5435    πŸ” 1543    πŸ’¬ 109    πŸ“Œ 40

Many of this are left cold by this. I sure am. But this - the kind of performative Andrew Tate cartoon-masculinity, the clumsy swagger, the maundering braggadocio, the needy desperate Iβ€˜M A MANLY MAN I’M A MANLY MAN, speaks to a howling void of inadequacy in some people’s souls.

30.09.2025 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2724    πŸ” 498    πŸ’¬ 150    πŸ“Œ 23

Wordle 1,563 3/6

β¬›β¬›β¬›πŸŸ©πŸŸ¨
πŸŸ©πŸŸ¨β¬›πŸŸ©β¬›
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

29.09.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That’s wild

29.09.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Ranking Member Jamie Raskin
Prepared Remarks for the Judicial Conference
September 16, 2025
Thank you, Chief Justice Roberts, for the invitation.
Forgive my directness here but the times are serious, as you know, our time is short. I have just five minutes and don't want to trespass on Senator Cruz's time.
Sometimes these days I feel as if all the foundational principles are being trampled and lost.
Often, I hear my colleagues in the House, and these are fellow Democrats, get up to protest some Executive usurpation of legislative power and they begin their lament with the plaintive cry, "We are a coequal branch of government..."
And I always feel they have lost the argument right there just by repeating that fifth-grade dogma.
First of all, co-equal is not even a word. It's an embarrassing redundancy like "very unique" or
"irregardless.
"

Ranking Member Jamie Raskin Prepared Remarks for the Judicial Conference September 16, 2025 Thank you, Chief Justice Roberts, for the invitation. Forgive my directness here but the times are serious, as you know, our time is short. I have just five minutes and don't want to trespass on Senator Cruz's time. Sometimes these days I feel as if all the foundational principles are being trampled and lost. Often, I hear my colleagues in the House, and these are fellow Democrats, get up to protest some Executive usurpation of legislative power and they begin their lament with the plaintive cry, "We are a coequal branch of government..." And I always feel they have lost the argument right there just by repeating that fifth-grade dogma. First of all, co-equal is not even a word. It's an embarrassing redundancy like "very unique" or "irregardless. "

But there's a reason all legislative power is vested in the Congress and there's a reason it's in Article I.
The Founders had a revolution against monarchy and its constant assaults on liberty. In America, the Framers determined, only the representatives of the people would have power to declare wars, pass budgets, impose taxes and tariffs, and so on. Article lis pages and pages of all the powers vested in Congress. Then you get to Article Il, which is tiny.
The key paragraph says a president shall be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. If we are co-equal, why do we have the power to impeach, try, convict, remove and permanently disqualify the president and he doesn't have the power to impeach, try, convict, remove and disqualify us?
The core job of the president is plain: "To Take care that the laws are faithfully executed."
That's it. Not abused, not thwarted, not impounded, not redirected, but faithfully executed.
A lot of the cases entering the federal courts are variations on this theme.

But there's a reason all legislative power is vested in the Congress and there's a reason it's in Article I. The Founders had a revolution against monarchy and its constant assaults on liberty. In America, the Framers determined, only the representatives of the people would have power to declare wars, pass budgets, impose taxes and tariffs, and so on. Article lis pages and pages of all the powers vested in Congress. Then you get to Article Il, which is tiny. The key paragraph says a president shall be removed from office upon impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. If we are co-equal, why do we have the power to impeach, try, convict, remove and permanently disqualify the president and he doesn't have the power to impeach, try, convict, remove and disqualify us? The core job of the president is plain: "To Take care that the laws are faithfully executed." That's it. Not abused, not thwarted, not impounded, not redirected, but faithfully executed. A lot of the cases entering the federal courts are variations on this theme.

Here's the remarkable thing: Americans have brought over 300 cases in federal district courts against the Administration so far for usurping legislative powers, defying federal laws, or violating the rights of the people. This summer, researchers found that plaintiffs were winning an astonishing 77% of the cases in the district courts. Moreover, they found that President Trump was losing about equally before Republican-appointed judges (72%) and Democratic-appointed judges (80%).
The numbers in the federal circuit courts of appeal are similar, with plaintiffs against the Administration winning overwhelmingly and again without a sharp partisan valence to the appeals courts' voting. A good example is the birthright citizenship case where four district court judges, two appointed by Republican presidents and two appointed by Democratic presidents, all struck down the President's purported negation of birthright citizenship. Then, on appeal, three circuit courts again all ruled against the Administration.
But everything is flipped when the cases come to the Supreme Court.

Here's the remarkable thing: Americans have brought over 300 cases in federal district courts against the Administration so far for usurping legislative powers, defying federal laws, or violating the rights of the people. This summer, researchers found that plaintiffs were winning an astonishing 77% of the cases in the district courts. Moreover, they found that President Trump was losing about equally before Republican-appointed judges (72%) and Democratic-appointed judges (80%). The numbers in the federal circuit courts of appeal are similar, with plaintiffs against the Administration winning overwhelmingly and again without a sharp partisan valence to the appeals courts' voting. A good example is the birthright citizenship case where four district court judges, two appointed by Republican presidents and two appointed by Democratic presidents, all struck down the President's purported negation of birthright citizenship. Then, on appeal, three circuit courts again all ruled against the Administration. But everything is flipped when the cases come to the Supreme Court.

This rules - @raskin.house.gov straight up called out Roberts to his face.

democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center...

27.09.2025 22:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1504    πŸ” 592    πŸ’¬ 31    πŸ“Œ 51

Only the best

28.09.2025 11:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How about we line em up by integrity? I’d rather roll with someone more conservative than Manchin if they have integrity.

27.09.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@jimlee21 is following 20 prominent accounts