DMV

I’ve started using chess annotations when reading papers:

- ?!: surprising idea that’s probably wrong
- !?: surprising idea that’s probably right
- !!: insight/revelation
- ??: fallacious argument

Draft of my handout on Baumgarten's Ontological Argument

YouTube video by Track Talk 1830 Tournament Round 1 - Game A

If you’re an #18xx nerd like me, this video will improve your life:

youtu.be/uxyaMSB8JO4?...

O-line diff

My understanding is that he also has already gotten a bunch of money in transaction fees

Josiah Royce thought that there were four broad meta-philosophical positions:

- Realism
- Mysticism
- Verificationism
- Pragmatism

(my names, not his)

I don’t know if this is right, but it’s been rattling around my head for the better part of a year now

A pianist wrote in asking to be removed from the list, an ed admin just replied "no we ride til dawn"

NYU chain has now progressed to include:
- “Free Palestine” messages
- Calls to unionize
- Puppy photos

bsky.app/profile/lagg...

NYU reply-all crisis ongoing. 100+ emails in under 2 hours.

I just had the mapo tofu at Mi Xun Teahouse and my life will never be the same again.

This is not the only property of relations you could do this with

Continental philosophers are bouba. Analytic philosophers are kiki.

“The point of philosophy is to start with something so simple as not to seem worth stating, and to end with something so paradoxical that no one will believe it” -- Bertrand Russell

My repost is not an endorsement of this tweet.

I *love* reposting things to endorse them while denying that reposting counts as endorsement, ensuring complete plausible deniability at all times. No one can stop me.

I wasn’t meaning to weigh in on its actual greatness. Just its alleged greatness.

When we talk about great really short articles, we hear about Gettier's "I justified true belief knowledge?", Evans' "can there be vague objects?", Anscombe's "A note on mr Bennett."

Not enough credit goes to Salmon's "The fact that x = y". If you haven't read it, do it. It's very short.

Finished teaching modern philosophy (Descartes-Hume-Hegel). Asked my students if they thought it was unfairly hard to have to read Hegel in an intro class. One said next time I should cut out Descartes and spend more time on Hume/Hegel, who are “way more interesting”. Not what I expected to hear.

When I’m feeling nervous about a talk, I just imagine the audience as bare particulars.

Overheard an undergrad: “I’m from New Jersey. Can you imagine having to defend yourself every time you tell someone where you’re from?!”

The undergraduate students at NYU Shanghai are so good that I have to constantly reevaluate my conception of how good it is even possible for an undergraduate to be

“Bold and cleansing” said my friend who is not philosophy-pilled

It was too polite, but otherwise pretty believable

Take your paper manuscript, upload it to ChatGPT, and feed it this prompt:

who’s counting? why are you counting??

Every time I see someone post this image it goes viral

An extremely attractive two-year postdoc at NYU Shanghai, open to philosophers, that will not appear in the usual venues for philosophers. Each year, one semester teaching in the core curriculum, one semester doing research. Happy to answer any questions. Please share! www.h-net.org/jobs/job_dis...

1. Convincing everyone that Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is fundamentally about truth.

2. History is an art form, not a science, and the goal of historical scholarship is not to discover facts, but to produce the aesthetic experience of *historical appreciation*

“Socrates destroys Thrasymachus with facts and logic”