By now, we know.

Well put.

I agree. As long as both content themselves with high profile protocol exercises, trust can't be built. As a layman, I just hope there have been bilateral (NOT transpacific) joint military exercises, and I'd hope there'd be a lot more. And how about officers joining mutually training courses?

👍

Not at all! It was just a complement, with compliments☺️

and as a result of truce negotiations.

I do not doubt at all the sincerity behind your argument. However, with this kind of logic there will be no degree of atrocity against the most vulnerable groups in Gaza with which Netanyahu and his fascist coalition partners will not get away with. The world may not allow that to happen.

It is not France and the UK who turn away from Israel. It is Netanyahu and - let's call a spade a spade - his fascist cabinet members who turn away from the fundamental humanitarian standards which made the existence of the state of Israel possible in the first place.

Shooting the messenger.

In the coming 15 to 39 months, most governments worldwide (including the Russian) will have to make the difficult judgement who between the US or China behaves in the more predatory way. Separate from this aspect, as far as predictability is concerned, the answer is clear.

However one might feel in detail about this, the genie is out of the bottle, courtesy of DJT.

Txs a million!

No link, though.

Merci beaucoup; much appreciated! This sounds quite like 19th century exterritoriality.
And sorry for the late reaction - for some reason, your reply appeared in my inbox only today.

much appreciated!

Is there a standard English term for "battlefield inflection"?

It naturally raises the next question which other stipulations of the constitution this outstanding scholar of law in his unfathomable wisdom finds wanting and therefore not binding.

Thanks to DJT's mastermind, he showed his incomparable strategic acumen by solving part of the problems only eight years after he himself created them. Umm, admittedly, only in a best case scenario, but we won't engage in pettyfogging here, won't we.

Executive summary, please.

Sycophancy has a name.

😯Who would have tought that?

Qui s'excuse, s'accuse.

Isn't that nice. Turns out he is not only a nationalist, but also a socialist at the same time. Luckily, since the 20s of last century, there is an abbreviation for that political perspective.

These are facts. Whether you like them or not is irrelevant. But if you insist on throwing out the baby with the bathwater, go ahead and send all (well-paying and well-performing) Chinese home. Other countries will be glad to receive them.
Once again, Trump administration celebrating ignorance. 2/2

The CPC is a constitutive part of China's governmental setup. Most Chinese studying abroad will be related in one or two ways to the CPC.
And any kind of official cooperation with China (e.g. in education) will entail necessarily having to deal with the CPC.
1/2

MARA. Make America retard again.

One 👍🇷🇴, one to go 🇵🇱.

They didn't. A salute to the brave Romanians!

A military tribunal, is it? I'll be darned..... gives me an idea....

Best news in a long time. Apparently, Russia's reach has its limits.