D.M. Schmeyer's Avatar

D.M. Schmeyer

@dmschmeyer.bsky.social

Attorney at Law and the inflection point between fucking around and finding out. www.kusklaw.com

4,639 Followers  |  267 Following  |  5,003 Posts  |  Joined: 05.05.2023  |  2.5642

Latest posts by dmschmeyer.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
a man in a carhartt jacket is sitting next to another man in a suit ALT: a man in a carhartt jacket is sitting next to another man in a suit
08.10.2025 03:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'll have you know my hairline is heroically holding its ground

08.10.2025 02:41 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dere's gonna be a million ICEs at da Superbowl.

08.10.2025 02:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, c'mon, you don't have em shave the Bill Swerski staches before you ship them out?

08.10.2025 02:24 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

...much

08.10.2025 02:16 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I feel like that's ambitious, maybe we start with some muzzle discipline

08.10.2025 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

...this is like the comedy equivalent of the baseball mercy rule.

Where do you even begin.

08.10.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

Very, very much so.

07.10.2025 18:57 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Rules on authentication on video evidence are gonna need an overhaul. The provenance of the video in question is going to need to be clearly and decidedly determined and demonstrable for shit to be admissible, or its gonna be anarchy.

07.10.2025 18:55 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Idk what this is even about but I probably agree with it

04.10.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not really defeating my assertion from a year ago that a CEO of a social media site shouldn't be on it.

04.10.2025 15:56 β€” πŸ‘ 26    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Yeah that's about my reaction.

04.10.2025 07:43 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's the neuron, singular, that gave me a much needed laugh today.

04.10.2025 00:19 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

He used to be a brilliant stand up comic.

Anymore, though, its long form monologing. Not for me, at all. Not amusing, not particularly entertaining.

03.10.2025 02:55 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He hasnt told a joke in like 3 specials.

It's bizarre performance art at this point. Like Billy Crystal's one man show without a tenth of the cleverness.

03.10.2025 01:59 β€” πŸ‘ 156    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, if you're more or less financially secure (by your own definition), consider a recurring donation to organizations the promote access to community, resources, and justice for folks whom confront even greater darkness in these dark times.

03.10.2025 01:53 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Donating money to Trans lifeline is a better use of my dollars than purchasing another mountain of Final Fantasy boosters.

Though that next mountain will be mine. Oh yes. It will be mine.

03.10.2025 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Games and social activities like Magic are refuges for many of these communities who need our help and our solidarity, and I'm proud to stand with one of my favorite clients to make a contribution to Trans Lifeline. This is a great cause. Join me.

03.10.2025 01:30 β€” πŸ‘ 60    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, holy *shit* do we have an antisemitism problem. Good lord.

02.10.2025 23:45 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What happened in Manchester is deeply tragic.

Minding their own business on a holiday and targeted while they congregated.

Ugh.

02.10.2025 23:03 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes.

The ICC has no authority to strip it.

02.10.2025 22:59 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He knows, I'd guess. He's pandering.

Very confident its dishonest, not incompetent.

02.10.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Damn near spit my tea lol

02.10.2025 22:50 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not taking a 100 billion dollar case with 100x those victory odds lol

02.10.2025 22:24 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The size of the pocket at the end is *a* relevant concern for evaluating a contingent claim.

Behind like 11 other concerns.

02.10.2025 21:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Granted, its costs.

But trial costs are expensive.

02.10.2025 21:23 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Defendant can make an offer of judgment before trial. If plaintiff rejects that offer and fails to win more than that offer, the plaintiff is responsible for all costs after the offer was made.

02.10.2025 21:19 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Most people don't know it goes beyond "not being a signatory", it's literally forbidden.

02.10.2025 21:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great point, one many dont understand either.

02.10.2025 20:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Conceptually? Talk to a lawyer in that field about the case and lay out everything. They'll run the numbers and most will talk then through with you.

If this is a "I've already done that, I cant get anybody to say its worth it, how can I convince them", you're not going to have a ton of success.

02.10.2025 20:52 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@dmschmeyer is following 20 prominent accounts