When the dust settles it may be that instead of Comey being punished, it will be Halligan and Bondi facing consequences for their unethical, unprofessional actions. www.thebulwark.com/p/bondi-hall...
22.11.2025 00:02 — 👍 404 🔁 76 💬 25 📌 5@eoineoc.bsky.social
Irish man in London Love UK. Pro EU.
When the dust settles it may be that instead of Comey being punished, it will be Halligan and Bondi facing consequences for their unethical, unprofessional actions. www.thebulwark.com/p/bondi-hall...
22.11.2025 00:02 — 👍 404 🔁 76 💬 25 📌 5There's a lot wrong with the US stitch up of Ukraine, but one of the worst is the demand that Ukraine hold elections within 100 days. The gall. What about elections in Russia ffs. Trump really is a total menace. Evil. #Trump #Ukraine #EU #Nato #Putin
21.11.2025 18:57 — 👍 179 🔁 53 💬 8 📌 5Not so sure the White House is going to be too happy with this ratio over at the other place
14.11.2025 04:02 — 👍 13051 🔁 3019 💬 219 📌 74“If releasing the Epstein files would end your presidency, then your presidency should end.”
13.11.2025 22:50 — 👍 6704 🔁 1111 💬 74 📌 36Megyn Kelly in 2018: " There's no consenting for a 14 or even a 17 year old."
Megyn Kelly now: "Jeffrey Epstein…was not a pedophile…He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…There's a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old."
You couldn't make this stuff up. You just couldn't. #Trump #Epstein
BBC News - US justice department investigates Epstein's alleged ties to Clinton and banks after Trump request
www.bbc.com/news/article...
Good and good. #Done #Next
BBC apologises to Trump over Panorama edit but refuses to pay compensation
www.bbc.com/news/article...
So after months of not being able to release the Epstein files, the Republicans drop 20,000 of them at the click of a button, because the Democrats released 3! Fascinating, isn't it, how easy it is to release the Epstein files when it suits you! #Trump #EpsteinFiles
12.11.2025 15:56 — 👍 14 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0There really must be no news to report on if this is the shite that's got tongues wagging. It's beyond yawn. I mean, yaaaawwwwwwnnnnnn. #KeirStarmer
11.11.2025 23:28 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0100%. BBC Leadership resigned over one mistake. The New York times stopped counting when the boss of this miss information mouth piece (i.e. Donald Trump) lied for the 50,000th time. Trump and Leavitt can put that in their pipe and smoke it.
09.11.2025 19:11 — 👍 12 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0Davie and Turness resign from the BBC, ironically after the Right whip up confected outrage about a Trump documentary.
Now there’s a chance to get someone sympathetic to the BBC into the top job.
We now need a full public inquiry into what Buckingham Palace knew about Andrew (fmr Prince), Epstein and when. Buckingham Palace reacting to protect themselves. Again. £M Compensation three years ago. Removing York titles two weeks ago. The Prince title today. And still no Met Police investigation.
30.10.2025 22:19 — 👍 29 🔁 7 💬 2 📌 0Zzzzzz
30.10.2025 18:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I'm so hoping this claptrap about Rachel Reeves has led to some proper journalists (there must be at least one) digging into the paperwork of all the Tory MP's who are also private landlords.
30.10.2025 17:56 — 👍 129 🔁 27 💬 9 📌 2Letting agency used by Reeves apologises, saying it's to blame for rental licence error The lettings agency involved in Rachel Reeves’ rental arrangements said it had apologised to her for an “oversight” that led to a failure to obtain a licence. Gareth Martin, owner of Harvey Wheeler, said: We alert all our clients to the need for a licence. In an effort to be helpful our previous property manager offered to apply for a licence on these clients’ behalf, as shown in the correspondence. That property manager suddenly resigned on the Friday before the tenancy began on the following Monday. Unfortunately, the lack of application was not picked up by us as we do not normally apply for licences on behalf of our clients; the onus is on them to apply. We have apologised to the owners for this oversight. At the time the tenancy began, all the relevant certificates were in place and if the licence had been applied for, we have no doubt it would have been granted. Our clients would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for. Although it is not our responsibility to apply, we did offer to help with this. We deeply regret the issue caused to our clients as they would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for.
Oh, look at this - the letting agents apologise for NOT applying for the rental license & say Rachel Reeves would have been under the impression the license HAD been applied for.
Can we have the apologies now from everyone who have been absolutely obnoxious today in their handling of the story?
Thank god that there is no real news going on in the world so that we can hear about Rachel Reeves and her letting agency event 15 minutes.
Our letting agencies are well known for their diligence and attention to detail after all /s
Oh grow up.
30.10.2025 18:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is this Kemi “lawmakers can’t be law breakers” Badenoch calling for Reeves’ head over this the same Kemi Bedenoch who has openly admitted hacking Harriet Harman which, last time I looked, was a criminal act? Asking for a friend.
30.10.2025 09:03 — 👍 154 🔁 32 💬 1 📌 1If members of the United States military are truly being paid their salaries by a private individual, the American people should know who that individual is. Now.
25.10.2025 01:04 — 👍 26575 🔁 7394 💬 1070 📌 350The King is spending even more time chatting about housing arrangements with his disgraced brother than he has spent chatting to his son in the last two years.
Did anyone at Buckingham Palace, ever once ask Andrew what happened with Virginia Giuffre? Or did they just give him £12M to pay her off?
Which did King Charles spend more time on?
1. Duscussions with Andrew on relinquishing his royal titles
2. His chat with Prince Harry after 18 months (45 mins)
🤔 #TotallyUnrelatable
They're worse. Why didn't they investigate his crimes? I mean, he first had sex with trafficked Virgina Giuffre in London. We all know this, but apart from Emily Maitless, has anyone ever asked Andrew any questions about this at all?
21.10.2025 05:08 — 👍 5 🔁 3 💬 2 📌 0Or try to. Not sure it's going to work this time.
21.10.2025 05:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And a Royal Family sticking its head in the sand because the privilege which allowed Andrew to get away with this benefits them too. It's appalling... and as a country we've accepted it.
21.10.2025 05:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Her defense of this yesterday was laughable. Hadn't heard or read the comments, but still knew they were taken out of context!
08.10.2025 11:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I see the magic money tree is back 🌳 #KemiBadenoch
08.10.2025 11:32 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Don’t stop rubbing their noses in the teachings of Christ.
02.10.2025 22:06 — 👍 15846 🔁 4163 💬 426 📌 101