Heh, donโt get me started on the fandomization of everything. At this point, I donโt think more than four people who like a thing should ever be allowed to talk about it at a time. :-P
21.11.2025 20:29 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@delafina777.bsky.social
Cranky lioness. You know me from Twitter. Cats, game design, Judaism, and very long threads. (She/her)
Heh, donโt get me started on the fandomization of everything. At this point, I donโt think more than four people who like a thing should ever be allowed to talk about it at a time. :-P
21.11.2025 20:29 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You seem deeply invested in the idea of her as malicious. I donโt need evidence of intent to point to harm.
21.11.2025 20:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I love TikTok! It's full of incredibly talented people, I find out about new science before I see it anywhere else, etc.
Video is powerful, which can also make it dangerous.
uh, well, that's dark:
"These populations, Kelly said, are more "biddable" if they are suffering from sleep deprivation. "Youโre totally out of it," he explained, according to The Telegraph. "Sleep deprivation is a torture.""
In unrelated news, fellow night owls, we are VINDICATED: www.huffpost.com/entry/what-t...
21.11.2025 18:09 โ ๐ 72 ๐ 24 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 4Yup. The US might not help Palestine if itโs a centrist democracy, but it DEFINITELY is not going to help Palestine as a fascist dictatorship, so
21.11.2025 17:58 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0YIKES
21.11.2025 17:56 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Thread ๐ฌ
21.11.2025 17:56 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I also think that making Palestine their only issue was a morally โcleanโ way for a lot of people to disclaim any responsibility for having to help the person sitting next to them put on their oxygen mask.
21.11.2025 17:50 โ ๐ 15 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0My suspicion is that A) thereโs an op of some sort going on by forces that saw Palestine as a convenient wedge issue, and B) the sort of leftism thatโs succeeding on TikTok is tankie authoritarian leftism over, you know, labor leftism/anarchism/etc.
Which makes it easy for the right to co-opt.
The willingness of TikTok leftists to stand shoulder to shoulder with open Nazis in order to shut up Black women saying โyou shouldnโt be willing to sacrifice Black/trans/immigrant/disabled people in the US to theoretically punish Democrats for Palestineโ was like
uhhh something is deeply off here
And if youโre arguing with a Black person and a white supremacist sidles up and starts agreeing with you, priority one is telling the white supremacist to fuck off, because they are NOT AND NEVER WILL BE, unless they disavow being a white supremacist, community. They are justโฆ poison.
21.11.2025 17:28 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0To me, someone who grew up in a Clinton liberal family, the question has an obvious answer: you are not in community with open white supremacists, ever, even if you are aligned on some specific issue.
You are not going to coalition-build with alt-righters. They are not fellow travelers.
They seemed perfectly happy to leverage pressure from the right as well as the left to try to shut up anyone who was saying it, and often *especially* when the person saying it was Black (or trans).
And that, to me, speaks to who theyโre willing to be in community with.
Like, I saw very little of the supposed leftists doing what youโd (hopefully) expect, which would be to say, hey, I also disagree with her, but Iโm not okay with seeing a dude with 1488 in his profile name call her a monkey, fuck off, Nazi scum, weโre not on the same side.
21.11.2025 17:21 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And there were a lot of them being very vocal about hey, this โif youโre talking about domestic issues in this election instead of Palestine, youโre a Zionistโ attitude is highly sus.
And they just got *dogpiled.*
And Iโm watching self-IDed leftists in their comments agreeing with alt-righters.
You have less power to affect Israeli policy about Palestinians than you do to affect American policy about Black and queer and immigrant and disabled people in the US, and you put the oxygen mask on yourself and the person sitting next to you first.
21.11.2025 17:17 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Black women on TikTok were talking very explicitly about community: your first responsibility is to your vulnerable neighbors, because *they are the people you have the most power to affect.*
21.11.2025 17:14 โ ๐ 14 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The degree to which that restraint had just vanished among the TikTok left was kind of shocking to me, an Old.
But I donโt think it was just pearl-clutching. Who youโre willing to respectfully disagree with is shorthand for who youโre interested in being in community with.
Like if you wonโt do it because you genuinely believe you should, having that additional restraint of โbut I will *look* badโ is kind of how societies deal with the fact that people arenโt empathetic to their neighbors all the time, and Iโm in favor of backup systems.
21.11.2025 17:10 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0But I also think, given <waves at history, current events, everything> that having societal norms where, if youโre a white person, even if youโre marginalized in other ways, you need to think twice about *how* to publicly disagree with a Black woman to minimize harm is good, actually.
21.11.2025 17:08 โ ๐ 12 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I donโt think Oprah is malicious, but I do think she should be publicly answerable for the number of alt-right grifters sheโs mainstreamed, for example.
21.11.2025 17:05 โ ๐ 18 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 0And look, I am not saying I think we should have a society where no one is ever allowed to publicly disagree with a Black woman. There are Black women who have obtained enough power and influence to do harm at scale and have chosen to do some harm at scale with it, and we need to be able say that.
21.11.2025 17:04 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And by the time we got close to the election, the main way I could tell the difference between the only-Palestine-matters leftists and the alt-righters was whether they were using โcleverโ filter-passing ways to say the n-word.
Beyond that, the rhetoric was largely the same.
Like, you donโt feel obligated, as a leftist, to take that claim from people within a VERY marginalized community seriously and respectfully, even if you think there are issues that should take higher priority?
Even if you donโt really care, youโre comfortable with how that looks?
โฆthat yelling at people for voting Harris, trying to get people not to vote or to vote third-party, is abandoning Black communities to what we all know Trump is going to do to them?
forโฆ Palestine, somehow?
Like, youโre comfortable dogpiling Black women for saying that?
Like, I donโt know if it was good or bad, it just *was.*
So half a decade later, Iโm watching this go down on TikTok and Iโm just like ok even if you sincerely believe somehow that Harris would be worse for Palestinians than Trump, youโre a white person comfortable mocking Black women for sayingโฆ
And some of it came from โas a white person yelling at a Black person about politics, Iโm likely to look like a racist bully, so Iโm just going toโฆ not engage.โ
This isnโt to say it never happened, and it wasnโt like there was much open conversation about it, it was justโฆ yeah, nope, avoiding that.
Like, there was a lot ofโฆ maybe we let Black women yell at this Black woman that we think is really wrong on this issue.
I think some of that came from a place of actual ethics: this is a marginalized community, there are real power dynamics at play, so let people from that community speak on it.
โฆthat 5 years ago, at least in my โweโre exasperated with Clinton liberals but we donโt see them as somehow more The Enemy than the people doing literal Nazi salutesโ online circles is that it would have been pretty unthinkable to justโฆ openly attack Black women like that.
Cynically: the optics.