Well I guess I should provide a pic of my Data Protection Cat... here's Trumpet, investigating a data breach involving Dreamies... #DPPC2025 #petsofdppc
14.10.2025 10:02 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@jamesgoredp.bsky.social
Data Protection professional, leftie, poet, history buff, bad bread baker, cat enthusiast.
Well I guess I should provide a pic of my Data Protection Cat... here's Trumpet, investigating a data breach involving Dreamies... #DPPC2025 #petsofdppc
14.10.2025 10:02 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well in my own small way I'm trying. Not least by bunging it on here.
03.06.2025 09:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I think finding out that £x of my Council Tax money was spent addressing pointless performative nonsense like this is a decent start in that exposure.
The thread above is making clear that it IS pointless.
True, but it's important to highlight this I think.
Ironically, the amount of time (and therefore council money) spent by officers providing redacted versions of information that Reform councillors already have access to can be quantified and requested via FOI....
So the question is why aren't the people who were elected to scrutinise the council - councillors - doing the scrutinising? That's demonstrably their job? Outsourcing that to a "DOGE" body is ludicrous.
03.06.2025 09:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It is actively wasting public money to introduce a pointless, unelected third party into the equation. That third party will be entitled to less information, and will get it more slowly. No council motion can override/break UK Law and change this.
03.06.2025 09:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Councillors ARE PART OF the council. They were elected as such. They are therefore entitled to see all kinds of information necessary for them to discharge their duties. Again, this is in the constitution.
03.06.2025 09:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The "DOGE" body will result in council officers spending pointless time and effort collating, redacting and applying legal exemptions/exceptions to information that is already available to elected councillors but cannot be legally released otherwise.
03.06.2025 09:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The above section confirms that Members have access to information that would otherwise be considered "confidential" and non-disclosable in the event of an FOI/EIR request by an external body. They simply need to ask officers for it.
03.06.2025 09:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The letter sent by Farage and others to Kent County Council ignores that Reform councillors ALREADY have access to MORE information than would be disclosable to a third party "DOGE" body, it is literally enshrined in the council constitution.
#Kent #ReformUK #DOGE #KCC
Politicians sacked for gobbing off on Whatsapp and Rangers losing to Queens Park.
Tremendously retro feel to this week already.
Yeah, perhaps AI isn't quite ready yet...
19.12.2024 15:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Far be it from me to blow my own trumpet....
13.11.2024 12:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hey - thank you for that, much appreciated.
12.11.2024 17:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0GDPR accounts (and those generally concerned with data protection) are what I'm after, but I seem to be in the vanguard. Be interested if anyone can recommend any.
12.11.2024 16:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0