Susi Bantele's Avatar

Susi Bantele

@sbantele.bsky.social

Researcher @Jiri Lukas lab, Novo Nordisk Center for Protein Research, Genome Instability, CRISPR-Cas9, heritable consequences of DNA repair, single cell high content screening, greenify research ๐ŸŒฑ

83 Followers  |  173 Following  |  18 Posts  |  Joined: 05.11.2025  |  1.6024

Latest posts by sbantele.bsky.social on Bluesky

Thanks a lot Graham, I am looking forward to any question that may come up and hope that you and your lab enjoy the read ๐Ÿ™

07.11.2025 13:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thank you Kumar, this means a lot ๐Ÿคฉ

07.11.2025 13:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thanks a lot, hope you like where the story went since you last saw it in Sounio!

07.11.2025 13:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thanks Marcel, I hope you like the paper :)

07.11.2025 13:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I hope we will get another chance for collaboration, this was great!! ๐Ÿ’ช

07.11.2025 13:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I am sure we will! Thank you for helping me refine this tweetorial ๐Ÿ’ช

07.11.2025 13:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Our latest collaboration with the talented Susi @sbantele.bsky.social and Jiri Lukas is out now @science.org ๐Ÿคฉ. We reveal the hidden price for DNA repair, with potential implications for genome function, gene therapy and ageing๐Ÿ‘‡

07.11.2025 08:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 37    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Shoutout to @zonderlandg.bsky.social and our fantastic collaborators from @grothlab.bsky.social @biranalva.bsky.social, Nicolas Alcaraz, Alice Wenger and @nilskrietenstein.bsky.social, Irene Mordini, who took our discoveries to the next level, great team effort ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿ™Œ#ScienceResearch 12/12

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Can a repaired locus still do its job? We challenged DSB-recovered cells with growth factor signaling.
Live-cell imaging revealed a ๐—ฏ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ-๐— ๐—ฌ๐—– ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—˜๐—š๐—™ โ€” both short- and long-term induction were defective. 11/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Are 3D chromatin changes after DNA repair tied to ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—” ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐˜€?
Using RNA FISH at the c-MYC locus, we found they are โ€” local RNA compartments stay compromised even after repair, mirroring structural chromatin changes. 10/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฏ๐—— ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐——๐—ก๐—” ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ?Labelling both ends of the c-MYC TAD revealed a stable increase in probe distance. @nilskrietenstein.bsky.social took a closer look with Region-Capture Micro-C and found heritable 3D structural changes in the entire c-MYC TAD! 9/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

๐—œ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜†? Not at all. Even after >two rounds of replication, c-MYC TAD genes stay repressed after a single DSB!
And our collaborators @grothlab.bsky.social took it further โ€” editing the Mcm2 locus in mESCs showed deregulation inherited over multiple passages. 8/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ฆ๐—•? As a first surprise, a single Cas9-induced DSB anywhere in the c-MYC TAD (>2.5 MB) affects local gene expression! Even when most of the cells have completed DNA repair and the break was over a megabase distant from the c-MYC ORF! 7/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

We used the >2.5 MB c-MYC TAD as our model targeting it by single Cas9 cuts, across the entire TAD. Next, we measure the c-MYC protein levels during and after DNA repair (marked by 53BP1 at the DSB) using high content single-cell microscopy of thousands of cells to generate population data. 6/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

These findings shift how we think about ageing, cancer, and the hidden โ€œcostโ€ of genome integrity.
It also raises big questions๐Ÿ‘‡
โ€ข Which genes are most vulnerable to chromatin fatigue?
โ€ข How does chromatin refold after repair โ€”and why isnโ€™t it always perfect?
โ€ข How can we safely use CRISPR/Cas9? 5/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

IN SUM, post-repair chromatin shows deregulated genes, altered 3D structure, impaired RNA compartments and gene induction. IMPORTANTLY, all is inherited by daughter cells, so we term this post-repair state โ€œ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒโ€, the ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐——๐—ก๐—” ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ enabling survival and proliferation. 4/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

BACKGROUND: during DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage response and repair, large (>Mb) chromatin regions surrounding the DSB are modified and reshaped. The big Q: ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ-๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐˜†๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐˜†? 3/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

WHY? Targeted cleavage of DNA is routinely used for experimental and therapeutical genome editing โœ‚๏ธ ๐Ÿงฌ But we show long-term consequences of CRISPR-Cas9 go beyond mutations and challenge the assumption that mutations are the only consequence of DNA breaks. 2/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Repair of DNA double-strand breaks leaves heritable impairment to genome function Upon DNA breakage, a genomic locus undergoes alterations in three-dimensional chromatin architecture to facilitate signaling and repair. Although cells possess mechanisms to repair damaged DNA, it is ...

๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐——๐—ก๐—” ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ?Excited to share our new study โ€œRepair of DNA double-strand breaks leaves heritable impairment to genome functionโ€, revealing DNA repairโ€™s hidden cost, out now @science.org tinyurl.com/5n6zw3ye. Led by @sbantele.bsky.social and Jiri Lukas.๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡1/n

06.11.2025 23:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 100    ๐Ÿ” 39    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 9    ๐Ÿ“Œ 5

@sbantele is following 20 prominent accounts