Thanks a lot Graham, I am looking forward to any question that may come up and hope that you and your lab enjoy the read ๐
07.11.2025 13:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@sbantele.bsky.social
Researcher @Jiri Lukas lab, Novo Nordisk Center for Protein Research, Genome Instability, CRISPR-Cas9, heritable consequences of DNA repair, single cell high content screening, greenify research ๐ฑ
Thanks a lot Graham, I am looking forward to any question that may come up and hope that you and your lab enjoy the read ๐
07.11.2025 13:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thank you Kumar, this means a lot ๐คฉ
07.11.2025 13:09 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thanks a lot, hope you like where the story went since you last saw it in Sounio!
07.11.2025 13:08 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thanks Marcel, I hope you like the paper :)
07.11.2025 13:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I hope we will get another chance for collaboration, this was great!! ๐ช
07.11.2025 13:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I am sure we will! Thank you for helping me refine this tweetorial ๐ช
07.11.2025 13:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Our latest collaboration with the talented Susi @sbantele.bsky.social and Jiri Lukas is out now @science.org ๐คฉ. We reveal the hidden price for DNA repair, with potential implications for genome function, gene therapy and ageing๐
07.11.2025 08:34 โ ๐ 37 ๐ 12 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Shoutout to @zonderlandg.bsky.social and our fantastic collaborators from @grothlab.bsky.social @biranalva.bsky.social, Nicolas Alcaraz, Alice Wenger and @nilskrietenstein.bsky.social, Irene Mordini, who took our discoveries to the next level, great team effort ๐๐๐#ScienceResearch 12/12
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Can a repaired locus still do its job? We challenged DSB-recovered cells with growth factor signaling.
Live-cell imaging revealed a ๐ฏ๐น๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฐ-๐ ๐ฌ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐๐๐ โ both short- and long-term induction were defective. 11/n
Are 3D chromatin changes after DNA repair tied to ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐ต๐๐ฏ๐?
Using RNA FISH at the c-MYC locus, we found they are โ local RNA compartments stay compromised even after repair, mirroring structural chromatin changes. 10/n
๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ?Labelling both ends of the c-MYC TAD revealed a stable increase in probe distance. @nilskrietenstein.bsky.social took a closer look with Region-Capture Micro-C and found heritable 3D structural changes in the entire c-MYC TAD! 9/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0 ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐? Not at all. Even after >two rounds of replication, c-MYC TAD genes stay repressed after a single DSB!
And our collaborators @grothlab.bsky.social took it further โ editing the Mcm2 locus in mESCs showed deregulation inherited over multiple passages. 8/n
๐๐ผ๐ ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฆ๐? As a first surprise, a single Cas9-induced DSB anywhere in the c-MYC TAD (>2.5 MB) affects local gene expression! Even when most of the cells have completed DNA repair and the break was over a megabase distant from the c-MYC ORF! 7/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We used the >2.5 MB c-MYC TAD as our model targeting it by single Cas9 cuts, across the entire TAD. Next, we measure the c-MYC protein levels during and after DNA repair (marked by 53BP1 at the DSB) using high content single-cell microscopy of thousands of cells to generate population data. 6/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0These findings shift how we think about ageing, cancer, and the hidden โcostโ of genome integrity.
It also raises big questions๐
โข Which genes are most vulnerable to chromatin fatigue?
โข How does chromatin refold after repair โand why isnโt it always perfect?
โข How can we safely use CRISPR/Cas9? 5/n
IN SUM, post-repair chromatin shows deregulated genes, altered 3D structure, impaired RNA compartments and gene induction. IMPORTANTLY, all is inherited by daughter cells, so we term this post-repair state โ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป ๐ณ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ด๐๐ฒโ, the ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ enabling survival and proliferation. 4/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0BACKGROUND: during DNA double-strand break (DSB) damage response and repair, large (>Mb) chromatin regions surrounding the DSB are modified and reshaped. The big Q: ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป ๐ณ๐๐น๐น๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ-๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ต๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐? 3/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0WHY? Targeted cleavage of DNA is routinely used for experimental and therapeutical genome editing โ๏ธ ๐งฌ But we show long-term consequences of CRISPR-Cas9 go beyond mutations and challenge the assumption that mutations are the only consequence of DNA breaks. 2/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐๐น๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ?Excited to share our new study โRepair of DNA double-strand breaks leaves heritable impairment to genome functionโ, revealing DNA repairโs hidden cost, out now @science.org tinyurl.com/5n6zw3ye. Led by @sbantele.bsky.social and Jiri Lukas.๐งต๐1/n
06.11.2025 23:05 โ ๐ 100 ๐ 39 ๐ฌ 9 ๐ 5