If youβre at #sfn25 you definitely donβt want to miss this nanosymposium on cilia, tomorrow from 1-4pm! Come learn about neuronal cilia, they do some pretty cool stuff!
15.11.2025 20:26 β π 13 π 10 π¬ 1 π 1@gdbassett.bsky.social
Current cyber insurance leader. Former lead data scientist @VZDBIR. Co-inventor of Attack Flow. Views are my own.
If youβre at #sfn25 you definitely donβt want to miss this nanosymposium on cilia, tomorrow from 1-4pm! Come learn about neuronal cilia, they do some pretty cool stuff!
15.11.2025 20:26 β π 13 π 10 π¬ 1 π 1This is drop dead sexy.
15.11.2025 13:16 β π 30 π 6 π¬ 3 π 0Now is the time to prepare to not set your house on fire this Thanksgiving.
15.11.2025 13:41 β π 722 π 130 π¬ 28 π 17Text in graphic: "Cards Against Humanity generously donated 100% of profits from their limited-edition informational product, 'Cards Against Humanity Explains the Joke,' to the American Library Association. ALA Explains the Donation at ala.org/CAH." Illustration of a Cards Against Humanity box on top of a short stack of books.
@cardsagainsthumanity.com, longtime supporter of libraries, organized a creative way to support ALA with presales of a special edition productβCards Against Humanity Explains the Jokeβduring Banned Books Week. CAH will donate 100% of proceeds to ALA.
ALA Explains the Donation: ala.org/CAH
#IGM25
According to signaling theory, some signals must be costly just to be costlyβthat's how you get a separating equilibrium. Think peacocks and their oversized feathers. So even if AI removes one costly signal, it doesn't mean we should stop technological progress β we'll just find new ones.
14.11.2025 11:52 β π 30 π 9 π¬ 6 π 1Corollary of the 'lemons' analysis is that good candidates drop out because they won't accept the offered pay rate. Not clear if relevant to this labour market, given the bargaining imbalances. But highlights potential for AI to produce widespread informational asymmetries thus 'lemons' problems.
14.11.2025 11:54 β π 12 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Good statement from the US conference of Catholic Bishops
14.11.2025 02:17 β π 6620 π 1980 π¬ 186 π 307"dplyr but make it bussin fr fr no cap"
hadley.github.io/genzplyr/
For each additional moralβemotional word in a social media post, the number of shares increases 13%
Our new meta-analysis finds robust evidence of moral contagion (N=4,821,006)
The moral contagion effect is even stronger in larger, pre-registered studies (17%).
academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Mannys stating that if you come in during the first week of November and show your SNAP card, they will make a family meal for there or to go.
SUPPORT MANNY'S IF YOU ARE IN CHICAGO.
31.10.2025 23:08 β π 1680 π 543 π¬ 16 π 26New effect size just dropped: The PVPP
01.11.2025 01:16 β π 8 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0So why are basic controls so good? Is it because they have been around the longest so are the most efficient & refined?Because they were the 1st controls & we mitigated the biggest vulnerabilities 1st? Is it that they affect the threat side of the risk equation by limiting threat actor targeting?
09.10.2025 12:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Why are basic cyber security controls so effective?
There's no inherent reason the complexity of a control should affect its effectiveness. In fact, I'd expect fancier controls to provide better security than basic ones.
quantitative methods, qualitative methods, mixed methods
07.10.2025 10:00 β π 429 π 86 π¬ 14 π 88The OpenAi preprint on arXiv arxiv.org/pdf/2509.04664
21.09.2025 12:50 β π 134 π 27 π¬ 1 π 1become my colleague at penn bioengineering: apply.interfolio.com/173716
19.09.2025 02:29 β π 10 π 8 π¬ 1 π 0Is there any way to keep Android/chrome from sharing Google links for everything?
I'm trying to share, not tell Google everyone I share with.
πNew paper!π
How is knowledge transmitted across generations in a foraging society?
With @danielredhead.bsky.social
we found: In BaYaka foragers, long-term skills pass in smaller, sparser networks, while short-term food info circulates broadly & reciprocally
academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
And how!
10.09.2025 05:15 β π 41 π 8 π¬ 4 π 0youtu.be/VzHcWZcqIA0
Dutch Waterfall scans coming out of the Netherlands, how you can tell over 1,400 IPs are working together, and novel temporal fingerprinting/visualization for scan traffic!
My PhD research.
lightscope.isi.edu
But, I need to trust my computer to store my credentials (which I didn't have to before).
Honestly, it's a password manager where I don't get to pick the password.
Well, a whole bunch of different password managers.
Ultimately it's "do you trust you or do you trust your device more?" And probably in the future, "do you trust your genAI model?" I suppose for most folks, we do trust the device more. I still trust myself more though I think.
11.09.2025 15:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I've been torn on passkeys but couldn't explain why. I think I've got it now though.
It feels like we're saying "We can't trust you to give your password. So we've given your password to your device who we trust both to identify you and identify who's getting your password."
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users β in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology industryβs marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues.
Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI (black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAIβs ChatGPT and Appleβs Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf. Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. 2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).
Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.
Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
Finally! π€© Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
We unpick the tech industryβs marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
I am fascinated by this guy who was a Higher Ed administrator and has now moved into teaching classes as a faculty member. He is documenting his whole journey on TikTok. Over the summer, he had so much excitement π§΅
05.09.2025 12:03 β π 971 π 257 π¬ 18 π 91needlework is great because you get to stab things
30.08.2025 22:27 β π 172 π 10 π¬ 9 π 0Another librarian is fighting back. Letβs help her.
28.08.2025 01:11 β π 48 π 25 π¬ 0 π 0Asparagus makes EVERYONE's urine smell weird, but NOT EVERYONE can smell that smell. For years, scientists thought that asparagus made only SOME PEOPLE's urine smell, because some folks reported that it didn't. This is an example of why it's so important to ASK THE RIGHT QUESTION.
19.08.2025 01:03 β π 373 π 51 π¬ 13 π 10