are you sure they’re not poo?
01.11.2025 03:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@sminn.ee.bsky.social
Techie, dad, Wellingtonian. Building with AI, trying to do so thoughtfully. Loves nuanced discussion of complex topics, and toilet humour. Founded Silverstripe in a past life, now CTO for tellfrankie.com and askastro.ai
are you sure they’re not poo?
01.11.2025 03:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sometimes it would be nice to unfold a body double of myself out of the 4th dimension. But it would be awkward deciding who has to die afterward.
30.10.2025 09:50 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The ending was deeply frustrating.
29.10.2025 11:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This explores similar ideas but for sex, if I remember correctly en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomised
29.10.2025 04:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Looking at transport specifically, it would probably be more feasible as a broadening of NZTA’s skill set / remit in some way rather than a separate Ministry of Works. I’ve got no idea what the gap is, and what still makes sense to contract out, though.
28.10.2025 06:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I find it’s usually the flea’s eyebrows, although tend to double-check provided links if it’s something important.
27.10.2025 19:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Perhaps it can be reassuring to see someone obscenely racist, and think “that racism. I’m not that. I’m just a realist.”
27.10.2025 06:37 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The neat trick is rich parents, isn’t it?
27.10.2025 06:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0He kissed a girl and he liked it.
26.10.2025 05:48 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“Steve Jobs had an idea by wearing the same thing all the time, but turtlenecks are boring…”
25.10.2025 09:46 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I just watched A House of Dynamite on Netflix and I think they accidentally deleted the last 10 minutes of the tape.
25.10.2025 09:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Stopped using sass, maybe?
25.10.2025 09:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0More seriously, I think that’s why people generally disgusted at web3 can still like atproto/bluesky — it hasn’t been built as a pyramid scheme around an invented asset class, which IMO most web3 projects seemed to be.
22.10.2025 19:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I hear you, but I still *feel* like it’s only web3 if we’re being milked for some invented token, otherwise it’s just sparkling decentralisation.
22.10.2025 19:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0WebXP is coming.
22.10.2025 18:57 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sounds fun, even without a chaos dimension sex party
22.10.2025 07:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0like a chaos dimension sex party?
22.10.2025 05:27 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Sad to say but Grok is probably the tool for this, with its Twitter integration
22.10.2025 04:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This wasn’t a joke it’s a genuine question! 😅
21.10.2025 19:00 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Representative democracy is working so well in the US, after all 😬
21.10.2025 18:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0“Insurance caps seems like an insane idea, but unfortunately people en-masse are insane”
Hopefully lawmakers rein in the idea, though…?
Insurance price caps seem like an insane idea.
21.10.2025 18:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Great little write-up of a handful of data storage techniques, combined to make a key store, mirroring the algorithms used in production ones.
21.10.2025 18:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think some bisexuals feel that their sexuality is rendered invisible by the specifics of their relationship, and so it could just be a push against that?
21.10.2025 04:44 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0what is the wet Claude?
21.10.2025 04:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Goal + Tools + Loop = Agent. 💯
20.10.2025 01:53 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Great video www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJkl...
19.10.2025 19:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh, right, businesses will have mostly non-financial assets, duh.
19.10.2025 19:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes, but it’s also not something easily spent on teachers and nurses. So the GDP figures are more useful for working out “what can we afford?”
19.10.2025 19:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0