Itโs the players than weโll have to leave out of the squad which is the concern, Iโd say. Maybe one to debate on the 16th! ๐คฃ
24.07.2025 16:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@adamjukes.bsky.social
Wanting Spurs to win, and wanting people to be nice to each other.
Itโs the players than weโll have to leave out of the squad which is the concern, Iโd say. Maybe one to debate on the 16th! ๐คฃ
24.07.2025 16:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Fortunately we can classify Bergvall and Gray as B-List from next season, and thereafter Club-trained for as long as they stay with us. Vuskovic too, one year after them.
24.07.2025 15:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Reality is that, though, he *is* home-grown by the rules - three years up to the age of 18. But heโs not *club-trained* - and thatโs the area where Spurs are suffering in European football. We are fine for home-grown.
24.07.2025 15:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Thatโs right he did kick Joe Louisโ ass.
19.07.2025 16:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I ainโt sayinโ Luka ainโt badโฆ
19.07.2025 16:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Apparently the view is that a club will pay 12-15m for him. If heโs in the Spain squad then youโd imagine thereโd be buyers. So I agree with Jill; weโre not gonna give him away for free. But to think we could have had another couple of years of Erik the nutter supersub AND had ยฃ25m left in the bank.
05.07.2025 17:38 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0youtube.com/shorts/rNN-i...
Along similar linesโฆ Spicer nails it as usual.
Mateโฆ if I hadnโt offered to driveโฆ that could (maybe *would*) have been us too!
23.05.2025 13:01 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The boy done good!
23.05.2025 12:58 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It was a matter of time. Surprised it has taken this long. And people will buy every word of it as fact, and as proof they made the right choice.
04.05.2025 14:16 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0โฆ but also, therefore, continue to encourage the linoโs not to flag too early if in doubt, which appropriate contributed to the โbenefit of doubt to the attacking playerโ mindset (that is so badly missed).
30.04.2025 12:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0โStop drawing lines, if it's obviously, instantly wrong do something. If not leave it be.โ
100%.
Iโm very-much in the โ30-seconds maxโ camp. If not obvious in that time; stick with the onfield decision. But it *is* right that clear errors are overturned.
Iโd also allow far more leeway on what represents โlevelโ; if not obvious then deem it level. But sadly that would require a change of law ๐
Me, also today, in the same shirt. Do you randomly have the number 4 on the back of yours too?
06.04.2025 14:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0This should be called โlevelโ, and onside. I donโt care if itโs for Spurs, or against Spurs. The offside law was created to stop stupid goal-hanging, NOT to disallow goals like this (and yes Iโd have given Chelseaโs goal on Thursday).
06.04.2025 14:14 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Sadly so many didnโt know what heโs likeโฆ as that stuff doesnโt get shown on the media they consumeโฆ or it is celebratedโฆ
08.03.2025 07:50 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Love this mate! Letโs hope the boys do you proudโฆ
16.02.2025 14:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โฆ a fact that gets too easily ignored amongst the headlines (not for a minute saying that the club shouldnโt be spending more - they need to to compete - but the stadium interest is a huge mitigant)
27.01.2025 11:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0How to say you donโt get the joke about Lynx
12.01.2025 04:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0