Not just the past. I'm puzzled at how people claim to be less trusting but then buy pills from some internet rando, fall for obvious scams, & vote for the most dishonest politicians.
31.07.2025 10:00 β π 20 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0@chrisdillow.bsky.social
Bourgeois interests, proletarian instincts.
Not just the past. I'm puzzled at how people claim to be less trusting but then buy pills from some internet rando, fall for obvious scams, & vote for the most dishonest politicians.
31.07.2025 10:00 β π 20 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0In the last decade yes, but in the years before Trump's first election victory, real incomes had stagnated for years: fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAI...
30.07.2025 08:42 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The far-right has been strongest at times of poor economic performance (eg 30s, 70s, now). Politics is shaped by economic forces. It's not a simple morality play, still less one that can be won by reason.
30.07.2025 08:24 β π 48 π 6 π¬ 5 π 1Political journalism tends to reduce politics to personal gossip. The algorithms of social media reward outrage and scandal mongering. Taken together they create modes of behaviour and thought that are the opposite of those we need to build institutions of mass solidarityβ¦
29.07.2025 20:59 β π 40 π 12 π¬ 3 π 0Very much to agree with here. But it raises the qn: how can we compel the Labour right to stop aping Reform and start seriously addressing our big economic problems?
29.07.2025 10:38 β π 10 π 3 π¬ 4 π 0My latest, exploring with numbers how the millennial household budget is basically incomprehensible to retired boomers.
29.07.2025 07:29 β π 399 π 156 π¬ 40 π 66As I wrote yesterday: βThis sort of measure is always very popular, because itβs easy to make opposing it look bad: why do you want children to be able to access porn online? Many supporters of this kind of bill are all too eager to jump to that kind of argument, and do so shamelessly.β
29.07.2025 07:58 β π 37 π 8 π¬ 6 π 1My new piece for @liberalcurrents.com on the modern far right canon of intellectuals
28.07.2025 20:56 β π 18 π 5 π¬ 0 π 0Long-term effects of leaded petrol? www.psychiatrist.com/news/decades...
27.07.2025 10:18 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Intelligence doesnβt make a species wiser or more ethical. It simply supercharges all survival skillsets, whether these are good or evil.
open.substack.com/pub/georgets...
The line before the one you highlight is crucial; hard economic times breed mean-spiritedness. The political answer to such sentiments, therefore, is to ensure that people become better off.
26.07.2025 09:28 β π 10 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0For these people, even the most right-wing of Labour governments is somehow illegitimate. I suspect this is a class thing rather than a policy one.
26.07.2025 09:10 β π 18 π 3 π¬ 2 π 0You're right. I was applying the otherwise silly cliche in a context in which it actually makes sense.
26.07.2025 09:08 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No she shouldn't. If we can't afford taxes to pay for the NHS then we can't afford charges either. And if we can't afford a decent state pension then we can't afford private ones. There's no magic money tree.
25.07.2025 19:08 β π 393 π 117 π¬ 21 π 3Not quite. Thatcher spoke endlessly of the rule of law; she'd have been appalled at fantasies of riots.
25.07.2025 14:32 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, but it's a very selective nostalgia; they want the 1950s without the tax rates we had then.
25.07.2025 13:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The paradox of the far-right: OTOH they are scared of social change (immigration, "woke" youngsters). OTOH they want disruptive political change, & even foment social unrest. It's difficult to see a kind explanation of this paradox.
25.07.2025 12:00 β π 29 π 4 π¬ 6 π 0It is important to understand what this case is about, so as to follow why retrospective legislation letting the lenders off the hook is such a bad idea.
Part of the responsibility for this farce lies with the UK state.
/1
www.theguardian.com/business/202...
Great.
24.07.2025 07:30 β π 11 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0You may be right. Maybe a more socially democratic form of capitalism would work. I'd like to find out.
23.07.2025 12:49 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think there is a chance they'll pursue sensible policies, but only after they've tried everything else.
23.07.2025 12:48 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Britain is not broken. What is broken is our capitalist economic model, & our political/media system which is unable to see this fact.
23.07.2025 12:41 β π 57 π 14 π¬ 4 π 1Yes. Such regular hours are unnatural, & were imposed by capitalism only after a long struggle. See eg E.P. Thompson: www.sv.uio.no/sai/english/...
23.07.2025 12:37 β π 9 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0True, but I doubt this is the crime Farage has in mind, especially as he's a Trump fanboy.
23.07.2025 09:37 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0It's ironic that one of the few genuine social improvements of the last 30ish years is falling crime, & yet the far right are pretending that the opposite has happened.
23.07.2025 09:25 β π 49 π 11 π¬ 5 π 2I've no time for Cleverly, but mocking his intellect is cheap & irrelevant. We have a govt that talks of maxxing out the nation's credit card & thinks nationalizing water would require cuts to public spending. That tells us that intelligence doesn't matter in politics.
22.07.2025 18:31 β π 29 π 8 π¬ 3 π 0This. The best thing I ever did was to take up the guitar (in my 40s).
22.07.2025 18:07 β π 27 π 0 π¬ 4 π 0Doesn't matter. The tax should be due on the land, so if it's not paid the new owner is responsible for it; knowing this, legitimate owners would need a discount for buying land liable for tax arrears.
22.07.2025 13:11 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No. The land tax would be levied on the land owner. If he didn't pay, the land could be seized. Obvs, the owner would try to get the tenant to pay rent to cover the tax - but that gives him an incentive to choose better tenants.
22.07.2025 11:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is a case for land taxes. People can disappear, but land can't. And land can be easily seized in the event of non-payment.
22.07.2025 08:59 β π 43 π 11 π¬ 4 π 0