Thanking the reviewers
04.10.2025 19:14 β π 129 π 12 π¬ 1 π 2@jjanetzko.bsky.social
Asst. Prof. Univ of Colorado. Chemist. Sometimes structural biologist. Molecular microscopist π¬. Usually found thinking about PTMs, GPCRs and protein dynamics. Bike racer π΄πΌββοΈ.π¦ & πΆ dad, π¨π¦, π Stanford/Harvard/UToronto.
Thanking the reviewers
04.10.2025 19:14 β π 129 π 12 π¬ 1 π 2A lab that collects data together stays together. Feeling like the luckiest PI to work with such great folks π€©π¬ @cuanschutz.bsky.social @cu-bmg.bsky.social
06.09.2025 21:22 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Welcome New Members graphic. Nicole Kaiser, PharmD, Vicki Catenacci, MD, Mohammad Bilal, MD, John Janetzko, PhD, Wyatt Shields, PhD, Christine Conageski, MD, Ally Nguyen, PhD, Matthew Witkowski, PhD, Peter Fecci, MD, PhD, Stephanie McGrath, DVM, Glen Peterson, DNP, Brenna McGinn, PhD, MSM.
We have new members! Welcome to the CU Cancer Center! π
17.08.2025 00:58 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0The acknowledgements section speaks to considerable privilege. Without a senior author, he and his classmate were provided with lab space, purified protein, and technical help. Their paper was communicated to PNAS. I doubt many undergraduate researchers have received comparable support.
31/n
So youβre saying thereβs a chance
30.07.2025 03:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Tbf lottery still has to be lower chance, but point is very well taken
29.07.2025 15:54 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0With news that NIH grant success rates are now below 5%, consider the effort that goes into one of these grants (apart from you, who submitted 60 AI-written grants)- why would you put in that much effort knowing your chances are only slightly better than winning a lottery? 1/
29.07.2025 15:47 β π 104 π 20 π¬ 8 π 2No better time to call or email your members of Congress. Next yearβs NIH budget is being debated in the Senate. A new nonpartisan campaign is making it easy to defend science and protect Americaβs innovation. Just follow this link to contact your representatives: www.protectscienceandinnovation.org
22.07.2025 20:58 β π 33 π 28 π¬ 1 π 0We are going to hear a lot in the near future about how University brass βhas to make hard decisionsβ. Twill be interesting to see who those hard decisions land upon.
20.07.2025 02:15 β π 50 π 7 π¬ 7 π 2Summary Table of the massive defunding of biomedical research in the United States
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
A short Bluetorial about my early days as the Director of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) at NIH.
The importance of feeling responsibility and taking pride in doing the best job you can
Oh no. This is insanity! Hopefully if we do twist the pretzel in 2026 it gets untwisted again in 2028.
27.06.2025 05:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excited to see this collaborative work with Olivia Rissland's lab finally out. We found lots of 2A peptides and an entirely new 2A class.
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
The world is in chaos, but we still need to rally with our people!
Janetzko-Bell lab and friends happy hour to celebrate grant submissions, new additions and scientific accomplishments π
@cu-bmg.bsky.social
In America, we have no kings.
14.06.2025 13:23 β π 2575 π 575 π¬ 143 π 47π₯΄
11.06.2025 13:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Setting up a lab has been no joke. Today, I'm stoked to have one more piece of my postdoc work out in the wild.
Several more manuscripts to go, and I don't have a lot of time for a blue-torial(?) today, but enjoy and happy to get any feedback on this story.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Sometimes this job can feel like a lot. But sometimes itβs the best job you could imagine. Your whole lab tells you they want to come in on Saturday to finish an experiment weβve worked up to and you get to see the look of amazement on your techβs face when her first negative stain works π
07.06.2025 22:37 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Fml
31.05.2025 01:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Federal funding to Harvard is primarily for basic research labs, a government-university partnership that has been US policy for 80 years since the end of WWII. International undergraduate student tuition is not federally funded. Anyone trying to confuse these two things is trying to play you.
26.05.2025 13:21 β π 37 π 11 π¬ 0 π 0So: In 2017, Congress made this happen:
NIH: Proposed 22% cut --> 9% increase
NSF: Proposed 11% cut --> 4% increase
NOAA: Proposed 16% cut --> 4% increase
Obviously, 2025 is not 2017. A lot is diff now. But still:
π° Congress, not WH, sets budgets.
π Public support & calls to Congress matter.
Is there a way to read the whole article?
31.05.2025 00:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0[Person with ponytail wearing lab coat hands balloon to another person in front of a springboard, a magnet hanging from above, and then a target] PERSON WITH PONYTAIL to Person 2: Rub this balloon against your head, then go jump past that magnet toward the target on the wall. [caption] Before the bathroom scale was invented, the only way to weigh people was mass spectrometry.
Mass Spec
xkcd.com/3094/
NIH funding supporting the HMMER and Infernal software projects has been terminated. NIH states that our work, as well as all other federally funded research at Harvard, is of no benefit to the US.
22.05.2025 12:42 β π 287 π 232 π¬ 37 π 46Oh FFS! This government is self sabotaging the decades long edge America had in recruiting the most talented people from across the world.
22.05.2025 02:48 β π 14 π 8 π¬ 2 π 0Idk about talented but I was on OPT after my PhD
22.05.2025 02:54 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Well, this didnβt age well π
20.05.2025 02:53 β π 11 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Published an op-ed for @cnn.com: βNobel laureate: I owe America my success. Today, its scientific future is in danger.β
A personal reflection on whatβs at stake as science funding gets slashed. Iβd be grateful if you could amplify both in and beyond the science world.
www.cnn.com/2025/04/09/h...
I heard rumors starting yesterday that this same stunt was at least being contemplated with PubMed!
This would be very harmful to researchers, but also to patients and the public as they rely of PubMed for access to health information.
Doctors also depend on PubMed, often in real time.
A lot of the things you just talked about in the outside, in the scientific community, I think part of it stems from the fact that so much of the scientific community is on the left and they didnβt vote for President Trump. And so almost any change made is going to end up causing, you know, anxiety.
NIH slashes overheads, fires directors and staff, freezes funds, halts trials, interrupts research, stalls grant review, and terminates 100s of grants on infectious disease, vaccines, mRNA, DEI, LGBTQ health.
NIH director, to Bari Weiss: Scientists are just upset because they didn't vote for Trump.