Tonykat

She thinks Biden or Harris or Obama would do something like this? Putting CHILD migrants in a room with armed guards and no privacy? These people are nuts, WAKE UP!

But what if I want another populist reactionary movement when my neoliberal policies lead to more poverty and alienation, and the right capitalizes on it by validating the vibe and blaming queers and brown people while I talk about how good the GDP is… did you even think about that?

Really? I’ve loved the tweets, can you point me to what you’ve seen on the repubs imploding over them front?

That sounds juicy 😋

“I think people are treating politics like an identity, almost religion really (SAD PATRONIZING SIGH)—it doesn’t really change anything after all, I’ve basically lived the same from Bush to now, don’t get so worked up!”

This is my favorite. It’s such a self-report.

I love the Disney Channel art, oh no! She’s going to be crushed by the giant gavel!!!

By the way, this involves sex trafficking! ❤️❤️🤭

Oh no!

Or, we could not be anti-trans and pro-genocide?

That seems… doable?

“some men just want to watch the world burn” with wordplay

So funny that it’s not “we would have utopia, no child would go hungry, no one in need would be turned away.”

It’s “NO DRAG YAY TY GOD!”

Wow, as a MAGA boy who thinks litter boxes are in classrooms and immigrants are 99% ravenous werewolf rapists (who steal as well), this FAIR and BALANCED coverage has restored my faith in mainstream media!

You did it, god bless 🇺🇸 🦅 🙏

Perhaps, god does say they were wrong though.

He gives Job the “answer” to why he has suffered: you don’t get to know.

Isn’t this exactly what the “miserable comforters” explain to Job—that he must have done something to bring the misfortune on himself?

I’m not surprised people are feeling more alienated/isolated, men also experience this. The solution is obviously not “50s housewives for everyone!” but goddamn.

Reactionaries will capitalize on actually validating the feeling, once again with hate, while we say “try being a single MOM” 😮‍💨

I know, calling someone a religious fundamentalist is pure pathos—guilt by vague association—can you believe people actually liked a post like that? Thinking it’s not just deflection…

Our society is cooked.

I just think it’s weird to tell women they are less than just because they dress or behave differently. All the people who complained about “big boobs” in my life were, old conservative men—which you agree with, again and again and again.

Your strange obsession has warped your mind 😂

Things we have NO evidence of: Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire publicly boost and support TERFS.

Things that we DO have evidence of: a nameless stranger’s inner thoughts and complete definition of womanhood without asking.

Are all TERFs this… unique in their critical thinking skills?

Are you a man? I’m getting big “not challenging stereotypes” energy when you say all trans women want to be bimbos or something?

Also, the idea that a woman “getting dolled up” makes her less than, wanting to control how women dress and express themselves… this SCREAMS male energy to me.

I don’t think you should have any? Like at all?

I disagree with you on this one thing. Jumping to hyperbole, just because you know how silly this is if you confront it head on.

No, he’s asking you to not have birth control, risk millions of women’s lives because of pro-life nonsense, and to abolish no-fault divorces. You know, actual issues that impact millions of people.

And men back up terfs when they say “you can’t change sex, no one is transgender.” In fact, more MEN say that then WOMEN do.

The worst thing Matt Walsh can be accused of is benevolent sexism—I don’t think you know much about him?

I never thought they were. A lot of horrible people know the difference between gender expression and sex, this does not make them “trans allies.”

It’s why the argument I’m responding to is so silly. I think you have misunderstood the context.

I think it’s more having a conversation with Charlie Kirk and responding to “gender ideology™️ is butchering children” with “I have a lot to learn.”

Kirk is a flagrant bigot, this ain’t David French or Romney, this is someone who demonizes queer people regularly and openly. It reeks.

Exactly, which is why the initial argument was so strange. Just because someone isn’t anti-trans (ie. They know the world is round) doesn’t really tell us anything about them.

Guilt by association, what the original post was doing, is pointless.

Exactly. It’s a wild thing to say.

Sure, but what we’re talking about is your claim that you can know if something is good or not by who supports it. People who support you are routinely anti-women.

The fact that you can’t even be a little, tiny bit consistent and just jump to another point is odd.

Sure, but he is deeply anti-trans. I’m responding to someone saying “I know trans people are bad because men support them” and I’m just saying awful men support anti-trans positions, which is why it’s a silly argument period.

Remember when Rowling THANKED him? So funny 🤣

I know the author is dead, but knowing that Orwell was a lifelong socialist informs this interpretation how?

I’ve seen batshit crazy leftists online, but I can say the same for libs—watch them respond to a joke on this platform haha—I try not to generalize.

Not at all.

I know who Matt Walsh is, you’re acting like there are no examples of this… why?

Yes, just like men who support trans women aren’t trans women. Men who supports terfs aren’t necessarily radical feminists—in many cases, they are the opposite on every other issue.

You have to…

Sorry .

When they go low we go there .