I think we can all agree: "There is only one way to do credible research, and it happens to be the way that I myself do research."
03.12.2025 18:54 β π 13 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0@mafaldapratas.bsky.social
Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the European University Institute. PhD from Harvard University. European & US politics. Political representation, institutions and voters' decision-making. Political Economy.
I think we can all agree: "There is only one way to do credible research, and it happens to be the way that I myself do research."
03.12.2025 18:54 β π 13 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Meanwhile scholars will hit the panel data FE regression with the incantation βparallel trends,β that literally means βI assume away non-causal explanations for a correlation,β and think we learned something scientifically special.
02.12.2025 21:44 β π 16 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0βI personally canβt think of a wayβ is deficient. βWe collectively canβt think of a wayβ is not that.
Also note the identifying assumption in, say, IV regression is not doing anything besides this. βWe canβt think of a way for the instrument to directly affect the DVβ is actually the argument.
This is an interesting paper.
I continue to sense that we as a field have concluded, either you have an identification strategy as defined here, or you donβt have a valid causal claim. And that is really not true.
Take: moderating in swing districts in 2026 highly likely to work; moderating partywide in 2026 has some evidence it will work; moderating partywide for the long term as a strategy to rid off Trumpism has way more perils and risks than proponents acknowledge.
02.11.2025 16:50 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Not new! In The Political Beliefs of Americans (1967) Cantril & Free found that Americans were "ideological conservatives" opposed to abstract "big government", but "operational liberals" for lots of specific spending. It doesn't help that they have no clue re distribution of spending.
02.03.2025 19:53 β π 89 π 32 π¬ 5 π 1Do voters perceive the CDU/CSU choices as representation and responsiveness? Or merely as electoral opportunism? Most see it as electoral calculus (and this might be costly), but a decent proportion (many who agree) see it as legitimate representation.
More answers in the paper to come!
7/7
German public is also divided (though not equally) between those who think Germany has special responsibility in dealing with right-wing extremists (the majority) and those who think there is no historical responsibility on this matter (25-30% voters).
6/n
- Voter's immigration attitudes also matter. Those who think immigration is an important problem and want to restrict it saw CDU choices in positive light.
- Interestingly, accomodation (of CDU/CSU to AfD) seems more costly, in electoral terms, in the West than in the East!
5/n
However, AfD voters did like CDU actions and reported a slight increase in prop. to vote for them. Note, however, the AfD voters are particularly committed to vote for the party and it is extremely hard to actually change their behavior.
4/n
Still, we can still interesting trends and changes!
Overall, general electorate did not like the Union's actions and showed a slight decrease in propensity to vote for them. Interestingly, CDU voters from last summer also showed slight decrease in prop. to vote for them.
3/n
Measuring counterfactual vote changes is notoriously hard! Our results show small changes, as expected from a single event in real-world, and in line with the recent polls that came out this week. However, note that being able to break a firewall with small electoral consequences is big!
2/n
Last week, the CDU/CSU breached the so-called "firewall" and attempted to pass a restrictive immigration bill with the AfD. How did German voters react? Together with Chris Wratil and Jorge Fernandes, we ran a survey with 2000 German voters to find out!
Read thread below for insights β¬οΈ
1/n
You wonder how the CDU/CSU playing with the "Brandmauer" to AfD last week has influenced German voters? @mafaldapratas.bsky.social @jmfernandes86.bsky.social & I have you covered. We surveyed sample of 2,000 German voters. π§΅with first results π. Spoiler: It did not go down as well as CDU/CSU hoped.
07.02.2025 08:49 β π 163 π 79 π¬ 5 π 12βΌοΈ HiringβΌοΈ
One postdoctoral position in my ERC Consolidator in Madrid.
Application deadline: end of February.
Job ad & details: tinyurl.com/3dwm96kb
Come and join me and my team in sunny Madrid for 5 years of intensive research and lots of publications, traveling, and fun!
Please share widely.
sometimes representative democracy means you all choose one guy to chuck over the fence and charge the military
03.12.2024 17:25 β π 51 π 13 π¬ 0 π 0Very proud of my dear husband @jmfernandes86.bsky.social, who just got a big ERC Consolidator Grant (2Mβ¬!) to study those we do not see and do not represent in European democracies. Many innovations, but I'm particularly excited about the move beyond the urban-rural cleavage. π
03.12.2024 11:42 β π 16 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'd love to be added!
19.11.2024 10:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Hi! Great list! Would like to be added, if that's okay. :)
18.11.2024 09:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I liked in the morning! Could you please add me? Many thanks for all your service!
20.09.2023 18:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hey! Could you add me to Polisky? Thanks!!
20.09.2023 18:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Elon said in a livestream with Netanyahu that he would starting charging all users (though it was not a set policy, just a shower thought he had). Plus the 2 week delay in invite codes, yes.
20.09.2023 13:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Transplanting this one from the other network, because it's so on point and so recurrent...
18.08.2023 21:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Perfection
18.08.2023 21:16 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Let's see how this works...
18.08.2023 20:36 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0