Robin-DeBowler

Its hard to disagree with this

So Mr chancellor what is your proposal for solving the issue you have put forward. We have massive national debt today. So much so we must not try anything different for fear of having massive national debt tomorrow. So what do you propose we do ?

I am pretty sure your hopes will be fulfilled MC.
I am equally sure that mine will also be fulfilled when you are not given the job with which to continue the same old same old I have heard for 60 years. Nothing different now than 60 years ago when it comes to a fair society. Which it can be.

at the additional cost to all those who can not afford to save.
Is there anything else you would like to show that advantaged the very needy MC. Or maybe you can extol the virtues of accepting donations to do your job. Maybe we talk about doing the bidding of other nations. Your choice friend

we already have a huge national debt caused by parties who have had a chance but your position says dont vote green cause we will get a huge national debt. Could you please give it up as its repetition of silliness. Try beating them up on drugs policy or position on trans rights.

I think they are paid for by raising the taxes that are needed. Where do you think the money comes from MC, welfare reduction? austerity? or maybe a donor somewhere.

:-) I agree with you C. I will discuss and explore to our hearts content on here with sane minds. Everywhere else I revert to only what may cut through.

Because it is?

She would be right. So are we going to keep negotiating with the EU to improve our cohesion going forwards. Hell lets just fill in the user application form and ask to rejoin. ?

Was it labour sold the gold, can't remember. You see labour as saintly I think MC. I did hope you get everything you needed from them, but you seem to think I am in some way trying to convince you. I am not, I think you came asking me for the justifications. Live long and prosper MC

Totally agree. He was badly required for most of us to even bother caring.

We are beginning to multiply and deny the divisions Prem.

It would be absolute class if the dancing protesters did the Haka when ICE appear.

It will be as they gain traction. I think the groundswell for greens recently is more picking up long term 'non voters' and disaffected labour supporters who feel abandoned by Labours 'new' focus on 'growth'.
Many of the things labour say we will do are contrary to their traditional voters ethics.

I am working on the counter arguments. For example was you aware that Zack Polanski can change water into Prosecco and once fed an entire town on one tub of humus and....
I have more. :-)

🤣

Zack needs to work on his tactics for debates
He is raw and I like it but he needs more salient and useful responses for some of his more challenging policies. We the supporting public need to ensure we do not fold under the press onslaught, we need to be the ones enabling and emboldening the Greens

having expanded upon laziness to its fullest capability. I find the following description to be perfectly adequate

.

I hear the frustration M

Unlike the Antifa help desk as manned by Eddie which did resolve your issue. I tried the maga helpdesk. They told me it was fixed and that I should just believe it and it would be so.
The little circle kept turning but it was fixed :-)

fascism and buffering they really have expanded their portfolio

Isn't this now the preferred route to wakening up in Narnia. :-)
Hope it worked Mozelle

Wow Colin I am too lazy to even type all that.
Which brings this one liner to mind.

'Stop calling me lazy I haven't even done anything'

They did, they just want to blanket the entire area again JUST TO MAKE SURE

I never lost my faith in the British public Syd, I suspect I never will. Did you see the last question time with Mr Polanski. I was expecting a stacked audience but as they spoke I saw all the great British people the ones I have known all my life.
It was heartwarming rather than restorative. :-)

Probably. I don't think the greens can carry their manifesto without adjusting our finance model and the rules of distribution. Its what I think we need to do.
National debt can be high because we support and promote corporation (UC for the working for example) or if we support people. UBI for eg.

I think we can afford them, we need to choose to spend on different things
So remove subsidy of corporates, remove tax breaks on wealth, spend on nationalising, spend on welfare instead of wealthfare
I suppose we will stay disjointed as a nation whilst preference for wealth and corporations persist

monetary values MC. I did not understand what you were stating.

yes friend, that was what I was intimating. I hope your expectations of Labour get positive outcomes

So in summary, your point is that I must be careful to only use evidence-based knowledge when making commentary around Trump, and mine is that I am using the FACT he is a cunt to pass conjecture about him in whatever form I wish.
I hope this clarifies for us both.

Again I am unsure what you mean. I am talking about the constant attack on those who need welfare. I wasn't specific. I am unsure what your values relate to or what point you are making
MC I am pretty sure neither of us is going to move the other friend. It was a polite chat, so thank you for that.