Fabian Hoffmann's Avatar

Fabian Hoffmann

@frhoffmann.bsky.social

Doctoral Research Fellow at the Oslo Nuclear Project, University of Oslo. Defense policy, missile technology, and nuclear strategy. Weekly analysis of missile tech, nuclear strategy, and European deterrence πŸ‘‡ https://missilematters.substack.com/subscribe

16,217 Followers  |  536 Following  |  836 Posts  |  Joined: 02.10.2023  |  2.1355

Latest posts by frhoffmann.bsky.social on Bluesky

What happens if and when U.S. generals receive orders to instruct lethal force against their -- on papers -- allies that they have trained with for decades and build deep personal connections?

Is there going to be any pushback or is it just "orders are orders"?

18.01.2026 09:17 β€” πŸ‘ 183    πŸ” 31    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 6

I've stopped trying to understand what's going on with Ukrainian heavy missile production. It's extremely odd. Across all missile types btw, not just Flamingo.

I'll look into it in more detail once I'm done with my PhD.

17.01.2026 19:23 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Oreshnik Problem for Europe Technical constraints, opportunity costs, and Europe’s unresolved deterrence deficits

Hi all,

I published my latest Missile Matters post earlier today, examining the challenge the Oreshnik missile poses to European defense.

You can access the post here:
missilematters.substack.com/p/oreshnik-i...

Short summary below.

1/5

11.01.2026 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 103    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 5
Preview
Europas Oreshnik-Problem: Technische EinschrΓ€nkungen, OpportunitΓ€tskosten und ungelΓΆste Abschreckungsdefizite In der Nacht vom 8. auf den 9. Januar 2026 startete Russland den zweiten bestΓ€tigten Oreshnik-Raketenangriff gegen die Ukraine.

Das russische Raketensystem Oreshnik stellt @frhoffmann.bsky.social zufolge eine Herausforderung fΓΌr die europΓ€ische Sicherheit dar. Diese Herausforderung ergibt sich jedoch weniger aus den technischen Eigenschaften der Rakete, die nach wie vor ΓΌberbewertet werden.

www.hartpunkt.de/europas-ores...

11.01.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

That is the core issue with Oreshnik. The missile itself is operationally unimpressive.

But it exposes broader gaps in Europe's deterrence posture, which lacks credible counterstrike capabilities and remains too dependent on the United States in the nuclear domain.

5/5

11.01.2026 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Non-nuclear Oreshniks are best deterred through Europe’s own deep strike capabilities, which are currently not available in sufficient numbers.

Nuclear Oreshniks are covered under NATO’s nuclear deterrent, which, however, remains overly dependent on the U.S. contribution.

4/5

11.01.2026 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

From a missile defense perspective, it may be preferable for NATO to ignore the threat altogether and focus on higher-priority targets.

Politically, however, this may not be an option, as leaders & publics may demand interception attempts even if they are cost-ineffective.

3/5

11.01.2026 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 26    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In short, I continue to view the Oreshnik as barely operationally useful. It can effectively be employed only against large area targets, including industrial sites, residential areas, and air bases.

Higher-value military point targets cannot be engaged effectively.

2/5

11.01.2026 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 26    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Oreshnik Problem for Europe Technical constraints, opportunity costs, and Europe’s unresolved deterrence deficits

Hi all,

I published my latest Missile Matters post earlier today, examining the challenge the Oreshnik missile poses to European defense.

You can access the post here:
missilematters.substack.com/p/oreshnik-i...

Short summary below.

1/5

11.01.2026 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 103    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 5

Looks like Russia ordered the Tiktok shop version of a Ukrainian mini cruise missile lmao.

11.01.2026 08:56 β€” πŸ‘ 47    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

I'm not one to cite Thucydides all the time, but the saying "The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must" bears repeating these days.

Europe's decisionmakers should take note.

05.01.2026 14:55 β€” πŸ‘ 74    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
2026: The Year of the Mini Cruise Missile? How low cost cruise missiles are reshaping arsenals, procurement, and market competition after Ukraine

The war in Ukraine has highlighted the significant utility of so-called mini cruise missiles.

In my last Missile Matters post in 2025, I provide an overview of the European mini cruise missile market in 2026.

Access the post here:
missilematters.substack.com/p/2026-the-y...

Summary below.

1/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 185    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

Thread. NB: β€œMini cruise missiles may allow states that were previously priced out of the missile market to acquire deep missile arsenals.”

28.12.2025 13:50 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That would imply ~20% systemic error rate, which should be above the expected threshold.

28.12.2025 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I was just making an argument about systemic error rate, not overall effectiveness of the strike.

28.12.2025 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Tomahawk has ended up in China a long time ago. JASSM would be much worse.

28.12.2025 10:51 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How bad this is really depends on how many Tomahawks were launched.

If it's on the order of 30, it's in line with a 10 percent systemic error rate which is rather typical for most conventional long-range strike weapons.

Anyone has the number?

28.12.2025 10:48 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

Destinus is incredibly underrated. I recently visited their production facility in Hengelo. Extremely impressive what they've been doing.

28.12.2025 10:40 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"In Europa levert Destinus [uit πŸ‡³πŸ‡± Hengelo] de beproefde Ruta mini-kruisraket, die veelvuldig is gebruikt in OekraΓ―ne."

28.12.2025 10:30 β€” πŸ‘ 48    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

Ukrainian manufacturers could eventually play a role as well, offering combat-proven systems, though export capacity remains unlikely in the near term.

6/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 67    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

American and European manufactures, including established firms and new market entrants, are competing for market share in Europe.

Given the state of transatlantic relations, European suppliers may have an advantage. American competitors try to counter by offering localization of production.

5/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 65    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

An exception may apply to their role in the arsenals of smaller states with constrained defense budgets.

Mini cruise missiles may allow states that were previously priced out of the missile market to acquire deep missile arsenals. Here, the capability is not merely complementary but enabling.

4/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 48    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Mini cruise missiles fill the gap between affordable, expendable long-range drones and costly, high-end missile systems, including heavy cruise and conventional ballistic missiles.

In this regard, they primarily serve complementary purposes.

3/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Mini cruise missiles are distinct from long-range drones.

In fact, they share more in common with heavier legacy cruise missiles, although they are offered at substantially lower price points (around 150-300k per unit), which in turn shapes their capability profile.

2/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
2026: The Year of the Mini Cruise Missile? How low cost cruise missiles are reshaping arsenals, procurement, and market competition after Ukraine

The war in Ukraine has highlighted the significant utility of so-called mini cruise missiles.

In my last Missile Matters post in 2025, I provide an overview of the European mini cruise missile market in 2026.

Access the post here:
missilematters.substack.com/p/2026-the-y...

Summary below.

1/6

28.12.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 185    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

Too early, would have been later.

07.12.2025 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Extremely nerdy missile question, but maybe someone can help out:

What is the first 3M-54 variant that features satellite-assisted midcourse guidance and when did it enter into service with the Russian Navy?

07.12.2025 19:14 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

The basic problem with the United States' call for Europe to lead on conventional forces while it takes care of nuclear deterrence.

06.12.2025 18:16 β€” πŸ‘ 87    πŸ” 21    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 1

Yes, and its an absolute defense bro product. So China now has its own kind of this breed.

03.12.2025 21:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

May god help us all, the defense bros have made it to China.

03.12.2025 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

@frhoffmann is following 20 prominent accounts